Essay On Rule Utilitarianism

There are six principles that backed up the positions of both sides in the Triodos Bank and Roche’s Trials. The first principle is to promote sustainable development. This principle considers the social, environmental, and financial impacts of businesses. The second principle is to respect and obey the law. In every country where business is conducted one must obey the law. The third principle is to respect human rights. We must respect human rights of all individuals even if they live in a different society or country. The fourth principle is to respect the environment. The fifth principle is to be accountable to anyone for anything. The sixth principle is to improve continuously by looking for better ways of doing things in every area of businesses. I would say that the principle that seems to be most correct in this situation is respecting human rights. I think human rights should be respected no matter what

This is supposed to allow us to determine which action has the most benefits or lower total costs and is therefore moral. On the other hand, under the rule utilitarianism, we look at individual acts to see whether they produce more pleasure than the alternatives. If the actions produce more pleasure or have lower costs, then they are the moral types of actions. Rule utilitarianism’s basic strategy is to limit utilitarian analysis to the evaluation of moral rules. Theorists came up with the rule utilitarianism as a response to different concerns critics had about utilitarianism. In other words, utilitarians responded to the critics by stating and coming up with rule utilitarianism and how it can deal with rights and justice. One concern critics had was that utilitarianism only looked at how much utility is produced but fails to take into account how the utility is distributed among