Anastasio Somoza and the Somoza Dynasty Analyze the rise to power of a Latin-American dictator. How did they affect law and policy in their society? What were the negative or positive socio-economic consequences for its citizens? What led to their downfall? How did the country transition through this process? Many people throughout history have influence the international market, domestic market, political affairs and law and policy, for better or worse and some even have committed genocide. These actions have mostly been committed by Dictators. Which some are loved and admired by people while others are hated and disliked. Dictators exist throughout the World. But in Latin America more than others. Anastasio Somoza is known for ruling for …show more content…
The Somoza Dictatorship came in two stages. As the George Black the author of Triumph of the People: The Sandinista Revolution in Nicaragua states “The Somoza dictatorship came to power in two stages, with Anastasio Somoza Garcia assuming control of the US-created National Guard in 1933 and then taking over the presidency of Nicaragua three years later”p.4. When Somoza rose to power the country was weakened and at a very low. When Anastasio Somoza rose to power there much subsequent class struggle in Nicaragua which dated back to the country’s independence from the Spanish empire. There was no organized opposition to the Spanish rule, there were only quarrels of tiny elites, which in the absence of traditional colonial economy geared to mining or agriculture, no solid economic base was developed. However the economy and class structure in the 1920’s was strongly influenced by a development of a single export crop which was coffee. But such a mono-product economy was of course, vulnerable to world price fluctuations. The price of coffee plummeted in 1938. It went from $458 per ton to $142 per ton. This led to the economic downfall of Nicaragua. Because of the …show more content…
This same myth, was the downfall of Anastasio Somoza. When Anastasio Somoza arrived in Leon, on September 21, 1956, to accept the liberal party nomination for a further presidential term it was just the beginning to an end as well as the beginning to a the rule of a dynasty. By Anastasio Somoza being assassinated it only led to his two sons to take control over the country. Anastasio Somoza García was succeeded as president by his eldest son, Luis Somoza Debayle. He was a United States-trained engineer, Luis Somoza Debayle was first elected as a PLN delegate in 1950 and by 1956 he presided over the Nicaraguan Congress. After his father's death, he assumed the position of interim president, as prescribed in the constitution. His brother Anastasio "Tachito" Somoza Debayle, who was a West Point graduate, took over the leadership of the National Guard. A major political repression campaign was followed after the assassination of Anastasio Somoza García. Many political opponents were tortured and imprisoned by guards under orders from his eldest son Anastasio Somoza Debayle and the government imposed press censorship as well as suspended many civil liberties. When the Conservative Party refused to participate in the 1957 elections, the Somoza siblings created a puppet opposition party, which they called the National Conservative Party, in order to
This novel is a historical story for four sisters who lived through the Rafael Trujillo dictatorship in the Dominican Republic. Three out of the sisters had direct involvement with Trujillo’s regime and had a huge impact on their country’s history. Their impact left a mark on the Dominican people of national martyr’s that spoke out against injustice in their country. Through the novel “In the Time of the Butterflies” it is clear that these sisters were raised from a middle-class family of famers and had their future before them. Unfortunately, their future was dictated by Rafael Trujillo.
Argentina was very unique during this period of time, they had a formal and informal power conflict that proceeded after the formal government was established. After this establishment what made them different was their way of further increasing the military. This being said, what Argentina did was not only build political power but also expanded their military power along with it. Sarmiento I feel viewed these caudillos as an end of proper civilization in Argentina. These caudillos and Sarmiento wanted completely different government types, while Sarmiento wanted the western European ways to be established this isn 't what the caudillos wanted.
Wright continues the telling of this historical event, under the topic of Fidelismo and the radicalization of Latin American politics. The combination of Castro’s actions and Che Guevara’s calls for revolution in the western hemisphere had a direct and profound effect on Latin American politics. This powerful force came to be known as Fidelismo and broken down to its core “it was simply the attitude that revolution should be pursued immediately” (Wright p. 39). On of the most noticeable symptoms of Fidelismo was an intense growth of demands for change. Wright notes that during this time, the intensity of political activities in many other Latin American countries increased, especially after Castro’s victory.
People like Castro are jerks and are very forceful, bad leaders. Castro canceled elections, forced non-communists to resign from the government in disgrace, worked secret arms deals with the Soviets, carried out mass executions live on the TV’s, shut down the free press, attacked the church and confiscated its property, tortured critics, criminalized private commercial transactions and blanketed all of Cuba with the enduring terror of his dictatorship. A bad leader is a big push factor that made Mario Loyola and his family leave Cuba and go to the
“Title” Manifest Destiny, a term coined by writer John L O’Sullivan, was used extensively throughout the 19th century to explain and justify American expansion throughout North America. Manifest Destiny is the idea that the United States had the unquestionable duty to acquire territory in North America as a means to spread the notion of democracy throughout North America, especially to ethnic groups who were not white (Henderson 137). Specifically, the term is often used to explain how the United States unequivocally acquired the newly independent territory of Texas along with an immense proportion of Mexican territory in the Southwest region of North America, extending American territory further south by establishing the Rio Grande river as
The people were not very happy with that. So the government was left with a large group of people ready to rebel and no one to stop them. The rebellions ultimately lead to their
Multiple sources declare many different factors to have served as causes to the Nicaraguan revolution. For instance, the website Inventory of Conflict and Environment (ICE), Nicaraguan Civil War discusses that the poverty and environmental issues of Nicaragua during the Somoza dictatorship were the primary causes as well as results of the Nicaraguan Revolution. Other sources present other factors as causes, such as funding from the Cuban Revolution, the leftist Panamanian government, and the Venezuelan government (Uppsala Conflict), who greatly opposed the Somozas thus forming together the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) (Appendix A) or Marxism as the cause, considering it “supports every gain and step forward taken by the exploited
The Mexican Revolution was life changing for the people of Mexico and the rest of the world. Everything from modernisation to personal expression was affected. For example, José Clemente Orozco was a highly acclaimed artist during the Mexican Revolution because no matter what the situation was he gave the full truth to the conditions of the Mexican public. While a revolution was inevitable for the country, the oppression that people experienced was not represented in the revolutionaries.
The new king. Pizarro had advantages, such as Allies and more,importantly pizarro
The Spanish exploration and colonisation made both a positive and negative impact on Latin America. The arrival of the Spanish explorers to the new world made a big change and they are the reason Latin America looks the way it does today. However these people were ruthless and were the tyrants of the new world. One of Spain’s major foreign policy objectives since the advent of democracy has been to increase its influence in Latin America. Spain has had interest in this area due to historical ties and a common linguistic, cultural and religious heritage (Countrystudies.us, 2017).
Corruption, although not singular to Latin America, has been undoubtedly perpetuated throughout history, with or without reason. The inherent, fraudulent use of both funds and administrative power in Latin American countries has had a profoundly injurious effect on Latin American growth and activity. Comparatively, colonial and socialist Cuba have both displayed widespread acts of corruption, markedly affecting their viability as a nation and harming their chances at both development and progression on both a political and governmental scale. The winding history of corruption in Cuba can, like most Latin American countries, be traced back to its colonial origins. Cuba presented itself as a major and profitable pawn for Spanish colonizers
The question is: Do these seemingly contrasting political and cultural perceptions of Latin America truly contradict each other? When examined
Pablo Escobar’s Economic and Social Impact on Colombia and America Introduction Beginning in the early 1970s, Colombia began to develop economically for one significant reason: the Medellin Drug Cartel, beginning with the wealthiest, one of the most wanted men in the world, Pablo Escobar. Not only did Escobar impact Colombia economically and socially, but he also impacted the United States in a multitude of ways that are still seen in society today. Pablo Escobar, also known as the “King of Cocaine,” was a Colombian drug lord and narcoterrorist during the 1970s, which became one of the wealthiest criminals in history. Throughout his “reign”, Escobar had many followers who believed he did good for the world, such as his charitable works like the building of schools, fields, and apartment complexes.
The Connection Between Character and Leadership: King Juan Carlos as Case Study The notion of having to administrate a political regime that is contrary to the beliefs of one own is the weight that current King Juan Carlos faced in the history of his throne. Despite this notion, Juan Carlos was able to implement his views of democracy into Spain’s dominated dictator political apparatus through his character and leadership; specifically he had the values of being authentic to his own beliefs of democracy. He encompassed integrity when making decisions, and was courageous in actually executing his beliefs under the supervision of loyal falangists/members such as prime minister Carlos Arias Navarro, General Francisco Coloma Gallegos and other