“Justin Lee was a devout Southern Baptist teenager nicknamed “God boy,” and his coming-out followed a path familiar to many LGBTQ kids in conservative churches. He confessed his same sex attraction with trepidation…but in college, he reexamined the scriptures, investigated the context of the condemning verses, and discovered the two core themes of Jesus’s teachings: First, the spirit of the law trumps the letter of the law. Second, the Holy Spirit guides believers to live out God’s unconditional agape, or selfless, love.” At first glance, it appears things have improved for the LGBTQ community. Yet, with all that momentum, much of the church still fights on against them. I chose this article, The Soul of Rob Bell by Joey DiGuglielmo of The …show more content…
I really appreciate his take on evangelicalism. Ironic, how something as positive as “good news”, morphs into something isolating and exclusive within our Western understanding. Rob Bell attempts to share how context really is the key to all interpretation. As he has continued to study scripture, he has come to the realization that there is lots of room for interpretation. Yet, it is the human condition that we need to address.
This ties back to the opening quote I reference from “Rescuing Jesus”. Justin Lee a gay student at Boila University, comes from a fundamentalist understanding that the Bible is the inherent word of God. Yet, just as Rob Bell began to discern, when upon further study, Justin discovers that if we are to take the new covenant that Jesus Christ provides to heart, than we are by no means to be judge and jury on someone’s existence let alone sexual orientation. “With these standards in mind, it became much easier to interpret Scripture’s difficult passages consistently”. Yes, there were slaves in Bible times, but doesn’t selfless agape love demand their freedom?” I believe Christ’s references about immorality and hypocrisy
…show more content…
These were people who had been conquered again and again and again and they believed at some point that their God would vindicate them. Often people have so divorced the reading of the text from what was happening at the time, which here, I think Jesus is giving these really pointed parables and I think giving them these images of do you want to participate in a new kind of world? ….They were part of an entire religious establishment that was part of the problem, exploiting the poor, dehumanizing people and I think he’s using very strong, very pointed hyperbolic language to say to them, “Turn your thinking around. Turn your actions around or you’re going to miss this fresh new thing that God is doing. So when people extract lines out of this and say people everywhere are going to burn forever, they have so warped the message, taken it out of context and distorted the story.…You can take things out of context and make them say anything”.
He is correct as to the damage that can be done when taking things out of context. Frankly, it is that very notion that has affected how women and those on the margins have been acknowledged or disavowed throughout history. I would add that by not getting to know someone, to know their story, things stay stagnant. Through connectivity,
Continued along the lines, any money or items they receive is given to the owner. Sages of which had written in the Lawbook of manu reflect the ideas presented in culture and tradition along with the superior and high class. In Document 2, the letter presented by Paul holds similar text in which slaves did not contain any rights and were commanded from their master. Although Paul is against the general ideas of slavery due to his christian belief, he notes that slavery exists and that the slaves have no power. Documents 7 presents the view of slave trade which was due to the slaves being acted upon like property.
Auld’s misinterpretation of the passage emphasizes slave owners use of religion to reinforce their power over their slaves. Christianity rationalized the concept of buying and selling human beings, and that God approved this too. In addition, Douglass used religion as a way to fuel his abolition movement. Under Master Hugh’s, Douglass began to learn how to read and write. Once
After listening to guest speaker and author of a Christian Coming Out, Lou Anne’s story about being a lesbian and being a conservative Christian at that has taught her to embrace her sexuality and her lifestyle. For years, Lou Anne lived her life as a straight conservative girl, and later woman. As she repeated time and time again, “I was in a unhappy marriage, I pretend to be someone I was not…” Lou Anne eventually was at her breaking point, where she thought about taking her own life, because she said, “the thought of living another day as straight woman led me to believe being dead and going up to heaven was the only way I could see myself ever being happy”. It was not until her 60’s when Lou Anne had a change of heart, the way she labeled
Through the analyzation of this figurative language it is apparent to see what his attitudes towards both sinners and God were. He saw sinners as despicable beings who were less than human in both his and God’s eyes and God as almighty and justifiably angry. This sermon swept across the colonies and completely changed people 's’ perspectives on religion and he arguably started the revival of religion known as the Great
All people are created equal, and they deserve life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This is stated in the Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution grants these rights to all human beings. In his editorial, “No Compromise With Slavery,” William Lloyd Garrison exposes that freedom and slavery contradict each other. Throughout the text, Garrison uses his passion for abolishing slavery to convince the readers that slavery is amoral and the work of the devil. Lloyd disputes that a country can stand for both freedom and slavery.
In paragraphs 33 to 44 of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s response to “A Call for Unity,” a declaration by eight clergymen, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” (1963), he expresses that despite his love for the church, he is disappointed with its lack of action regarding the Civil Rights Movement. Through powerful, emotionally-loaded diction, syntax, and figurative language, King adopts a disheartened tone later shifts into a determined tone in order to express and reflect on his disappointment with the church’s inaction and his goals for the future. King begins this section by bluntly stating that he is “greatly disappointed” (33) with the church, though he “will remain true to it as long as the cord of life shall lengthen” (33). By appealing to ethos and informing the audience of his history with the church, he indicates that he is not criticizing the church for his own sake, but for the good of the church.
It is a common argument for Christian slaveholders to make “…that God cursed Ham, and therefore American slavery is right…” (5). this argument exposes their hypocrisy as it conveys how they attempt to stretch small pieces of scripture to justify the violence of the American slavery. Douglass thus asks if it is humane to use a small piece of writing to damn an entire race to hardship and subhuman treatment. This case of blasphemy is amplified by the observation that Douglass makes of one of his slave masters, Mr. Covey, in that “he seemed to think himself equal to deceiving the almighty” (61).
The slaveholders stated that slavery should not be abolished because it is described in the Bible
Religion and its relationship to slavery is a contradictive subject, whether it was forced upon slaves or was a form of hope and freedom is still commonly debated about to this day. However, these individuals were devoted Christians in the abolitionist movement who all
Slaves were warned to obey their masters, “As to the Lord and not to men.” However, their masters were also held to this same standard. Masters were expected to treat their slaves well and even to treat them as brothers, as God is the master of all people, including
The following passages were used to combat the proslavery use of the bible because they believe the type of slavery happening in the United States was different from what the bible referred to. They believed having generation born into slavery and never having a chance to earn their freedom was morally reprehensive able and wrong. Furthermore they believed Christians should not take part in this practice. Exodus “Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death. Deuteronomy 23:15-16 “You shall not give up to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you.
This introduced the principle that slavery was a sin and an abomination. Ministers in the North preached about the horrors of slavery, especially the slave trade, and that God would seek vengeance on any nation that committed such cruelties. In New York during the year 1810, Reverend William Miller gave a sermon on the abolition of the slave trade stating, “ According to the basis of the christian religion, we are bound to love God with all our soul, and our neighbor as ourselves: but this sacred injunction does not reach the heart of the oppressors of Africans” (Miller 11). This was the very premise for most of the Abolition Movement: thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.
Christianity was, to the slaves of America, (something with a double meaning). In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass an American Slave, Frederick Douglass, the author, argues about how Christianity can mean one thing to a free white man and something completely different to a black slave. The slave owners follow the ‘Christianity of the Land’ while the slaves follow the ‘Christianity of Christ.’ Frederick begins to build his credibility to a, white, northern, audience by including documents from trustworthy writers and by getting into personal experiences through his writing. Throughout the narrative, he is articulate in how he writes, and it shows the reader that he is well educated.
Douglass tells us this by saying that he believes anyone who is a slave owner cannot be a Christian. In his view, he believes being a slave owner violates the very principles of being a Christian. Auld quote he believes that the Christianity practiced by the Slave owners and the Christianity practiced by non-slave owners are two
Religion seems to play an important and controversial role between issues that involve the LGBTQ society. Before American Democracy can answer any of these questions, a line needs to be drawn between politics and