FDR and JFK were both really important presidents during their time. They both gave great speeches about the US and how they wanted the world to be. During that time, the US was in a rough position with conflicts going on. Both Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy’s inaugural speech address the problem during that time with a way to fix the world. However, in Roosevelt's speech he talked about the nation all together whereas in Kennedy’s speech he wanted to have every person feel needed with others during a hard time. During both JFK and FDR’s presidency they both were in a time of major conflict. During FDR’s “Four Freedoms” speech, Roosevelt talked about not wanting to stay out of conflict because with the past of other countries trying to stay out of conflict makes it worse for the future. As Roosevelt states “Today, thinking of our children and of their children, we oppose enforced isolation for ourselves or for any other part of the Americas” (Roosevelt par. 5). Roosevelt wanted to protect the future for others so everyone could live happily. Roosevelt later states that when the World War broke out that it only was a small threat but as time went on people realized it would lead to the downfall of democratic nations to maybe affect the …show more content…
JFK wanted others to unite and help each other during a hard time. Kennedy went through many other wars and hard times before his presidency such as serving in the military during WWII. Kennedy wanted to strengthen the military and wanted to help out other small countries around the US so the Soviet Union would not be able to launch nuclear weapons. Kennedy emphasized “To our sister republics south of the border, we offer a special pledge--to convert our good words into good deeds--in a new alliance” (Kennedy par. 10). Since Kennedy had the war experience he tried his hardest to tell everyone what is right and how everyone should handle
Franklin Delano Roosevelt is largely credited with leading the United States into World War II in 1941. Opinions are divided regarding FDR's move to engage the United States in the war, with many believing that it was necessary to protect the nation's freedom, while others disagree and believe Roosevelt brought danger and destruction to the U.S. and the rest of the world. In this essay, I will examine both sides of this debate and evaluate the arguments for concluding whether FDR's decision was a wise one. Franklin D. Roosevelt's decision to engage the United States into World War II was a controversial one, as the United States had initially pledged not to join the war unless directly threatened. Ultimately, it is difficult to agree or disagree
In his draft, the word “we” often appears, they not only drag the readers to his point of view, but enforce the sense of geniality to his readers and his allies, and as JFK suggests: “ To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends.” the word “we” again categorizes American people as a whole entity that agrees with him -- neglecting the fact that there are individuals who did not share the point of view -- meanwhile provides a sense of patriotism, and invincible faith to pursuit liberty and peace; on the other hand, it makes his figure steadfast as the president who unites his people to achieve one goal and one goal only --.the pursuit of liberty and
At the beginning of his Presidency, he clarified his goals for foreign policies by outlining them in one of his many speeches. President Kennedy said, “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate,” (Document B). This was very powerful because it showed a great message in a simplistic way. In this, he is describing that the United States will not agree to something just because we are too afraid to go against another country’s demands.
Senator Harry Truman supported Roosevelt’s plan to rebuild and established the nation’s defense. He believed that President Roosevelt’s four freedoms speech had shown the president at his best. Roosevelt was adamant that America should act as an arsenal for all nations were actively engaged in war with aggressor nations. He told Congress and the American people that those nations in defense of democracy did not “need manpower but they do need billions of dollars’ worth of weapons of defense.” Realizing that the allies may not will not be able to pay in cash for their munitions and supplies FDR took his land lease proposal a step further.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt ,president of the United States. He gave a famous speech called “State of the Union Address”, in that speech he talked about “Four Freedom”. He gave this speech on January 6,1941. Roosevelt goal was to give hope to this people during that time. United States was in a deep depression because Europe was at war and most nations had lost their freedom to Nazi.
Even after Japan attacked in the pacific Roosevelt still tried to stay neutral and not get involved much, but later on Germany and France were battling it out a big part of WW2. Roosevelt didn’t want to help the allies but once Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in Hawaii a warning was given to Japan and then the US finally decided to get involved with WW2. The allies were Britain and the Soviet Union, the reason why the Soviets joined was only because the US agreed to help them with fighting off Germany. Being a President during WW2 says it all, FDR did a great job even though he didn't accomplish his original idea of isolationism. FDR also had post war plans before his death that were world peace and order(U-S-HISTORY).
Roosevelt cared for his people and tried to make them have a safer and healthier life. Without many of Roosevelt’s caring and long-term leadership qualities America wouldn’t be the same as it is today. If Roosevelt did run the country today he would run it with many other qualities
Over 100 million people in the world do not have the same basic freedoms that every American has, and over 4 billion people face harsh religious freedoms not allowing them to believe in what they want. During times of conflict in the world the United States and its presidents work to keep the freedoms that we as Americans have. Both Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” speech and Kennedy’s inaugural address describe how they want to preserve freedom in our country and the world. However, Roosevelt’s speech talks about aiding other countries to protect freedom and liberty, whereas Kennedy’s speech talks more about protecting our own country 's freedom and how to do it, through negotiation.
“For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life.” This quote from the 35th president of the United States set a precedent of greatness for our country. The man who set such a precedent was John F. Kennedy. A very persuasive and well-read man, when he gave his inaugural address, our nation and the world knew we were in good hands. JFK not only was well-read, he gave moving speeches.
“We pledge our best efforts to help them [other nations] help themselves, for whatever period is required, not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right.” The purpose for JFK adding that it should be the responsibility of the United States to promote peace and democracy is because he believes that it is essential to use the power that the United States has to promote good well being all around the world. The argument is presented in the inaugural address by JFK saying that America is willing to “Support any friends” and “meet any hardship" to protect the individual rights of people everywhere. By pledging that, it makes it apparent how important it was to JFK that it is the responsibility of the United States to be the protector of those
JFK took office in the midst of the Cold War. The enmity created by the conflict forced Americans to be more open-minded to all solutions. This combined with JFK’s appearance
This quote shows charged language by using aggressive words like war, disciplined, hard, and bitter peace. These words show that the future holds some challenges ahead, but nothing that Americans can't handle. The next piece of evidence in President JFK’s inaugural address shows repetition: he says, “Let both sides…” (JFK 16-20). He starts paragraphs 16-19 with “Let both sides…” and says “Let both sides…” in the middle of paragraph 20. He keeps saying, “Let both sides…” to tell the audience that there is good in other countries, not just the United States.
2. Theodore Roosevelt was considered to be the “First Modern President because he had a strong- firm personality, and showed aggressive actions towards others. Roosevelt believed that the President had the right to use all power unless they were denied to him. Also, that he has a responsibility to the people, and so challenged himself to avoid notions of limited government and individualism; the government he controlled should maintain as an agent who should give the people what they want. Roosevelt’s presidency opened up creativity of progressive movement, lending the prestige of the White House to welfare legislation, government regulation, and the conservation movement.
John Foster Dulles, which is Eisenhower’s secretary of state believed in brinkmanship which was the idea of threatening war, but not taking action (Ayers 850). This is how Eisenhower and John Foster Dulles used to settle conflicts. President Kennedy differed from the other two presidents because he believed in flexible response instead of containment. The United States did not want to see everyone else struggle. Flexible response is a better way to deal with other countries (Ayers 886).
Kennedy realized how easy it was for a country to break apart in a time that they needed to come together. Being sworn into office, he could see the fear of the future in the eyes of the nation and truly wanted to reassure them that by being willing to face change as one, success was possible. Kennedy was able to assertively get his point across by emphasizing how prioritizing unification of the country is by relying on