The Stamp Act: High Backlash Greater Than The Sugar And Quartering Act

418 Words2 Pages

The Stamp act prompted a high backlash greater than the Sugar and Quartering Act for three main reasons: An educated resistance, time to organize, and undermining colonial self rule. The Stamp Act implemented the kind of goods used by merchants and lawyers, which mixed up a educated an powerful resistance. Even with the Parliament passing of the Stamp Act in March; this Act would not be effective until November of 1765, given the colonists time to assemble. The Stamp Act was a direct tax on the colonists, and earnings were suppose to pay salaries of colonial officials, something the colonists previously done. By taxing the colonies which would allow the crown could pay these salaries undermined colonial control over royal official and seemed

More about The Stamp Act: High Backlash Greater Than The Sugar And Quartering Act

Open Document