ipl-logo

The Stanford Jail Experiment Summary

989 Words4 Pages

The Stanford jail experiment, which was carried out in 1971 by Phillip Zimbardo, was designed to examine the function of power in a prison environment. In a mock jail setting, subjects were randomly assigned to the roles of "prisoners" and "guards." The experiment was intended to run for two weeks but was discontinued after six days. In the Stanford experiment, a few ethical principles were not adhered to.
The ethics of Informed Consent. The act of providing interested research volunteers with the facts they require to fully understand the nature of a project and make a decision regarding participation (Farray, N., 2023) In the video, it is stated that Zimbardo argues that volunteers were informed of the circumstances they would face (Im, 2017), …show more content…

Looking at the video, Prisoner #8612 assumed that no one could leave the experiment until it was over. That is a classic example of deception by Zimbardo in the Stanford experiment. Even though he stated in the video that "he believed that we would never let him go, although we never said that," he didn’t reassure the prisoner that he could leave on his own accord. Zimbardo was not truthful with prisoner #8612, assuring him that he can leave the experiment whenever he wishes, and prisoner #8612 convinces the other prisoners that they were in a real prison and that they cannot leave until the experiment is over. That in itself lacks integrity and was …show more content…

The exchanges between the guards and the prisoners were unrestricted, yet they were hostile or even demeaning. While the prisoners were submissive and depressed, the guards started acting aggressively and abusively toward them. Five of the inmates had to be removed from the research early due to strong negative feelings, including crying and increased anxiety. When the guards made the rest of the prisoners chant, "Prisoner #819 did a bad thing," he refuted his claim of wanting to leave because he immediately began to believe he was a bad prisoner. Even the researchers themselves started to forget what was going on. Before graduate student, Christina Maslach raised concerns about the environment in the mock prison and the morality of continuing the experiment, Zimbardo, who served as the prison warden, did not take the abusive behavior of the jail guards seriously.
In conclusion, in the Stanford prison experiments, a few ethical principles were not adhered to, as prisoners’ human rights were not regarded, putting the participants in possible danger.
What should have been different in the Stanford prison experiment?
Zimbardo should have had another colleague oversee the experiment as well, as the researcher should not have had a dual role in the experiment. Young students

Show More
Related

  • Kyle Patrick Alvarez's 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'

    749 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, carried out by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, revealed the significant influence of social structure on violence and brutality in prisons. This essay will look at how Zimbardo's study revealed a link between the way relationships are structured inside of prisons and the rise of aggressive and abusive conduct. It will also suggest adjustments to the social structure of jails that might lessen violence. It will also include any potential opposition to the reforms and the difficulties in putting them into practice. College students were given roles as guards or convicts at random in Zimbardo's experiment, which involves simulating a prison setting.

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo

    689 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most infamous and controversial psychological experiments to ever take place to this day. In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo created an experiment that tested the changes one endures when they have to adapt in a prison environment and provided an explanation for the dehumanizing effects of the penile system. 24, college-aged, men were chosen to participate in the 2 week long experiment by flipping a coin to decide whether they’re given the role of prisoner or guard. After their roles were determined, they were given uniforms, cells, identification numbers, etc. Little did he know that the results of this experiment would give some of the most ethically challenged results of time.

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    876 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971 and was funded by the US Naval Office. The experiment consisted of 24 volunteer college students who were paid $15 a day to serve as guards and prisoners in a simulated prison environment. Prior to the experiment, each volunteer was given a diagnostic interview to eliminate anyone with “psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse.” The experiment “was intended to measure the effect of role-playing, labeling, and social expectations on behavior over a period of two weeks,” but Zimbardo ended it after six days due to abuse by the guards and the psychological wellbeing of the prisoners. By the second day of the experiment, Zimbardo already noticed behavioral changes in both the guards and prisoners.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison And The Milgram Experiment

    1010 Words  | 5 Pages

    What does it mean to be in a role of a prisoner and a guard? We answer this question by examining two main experiments, The Stanford Prison and the Milgram Experiment. Both emphasize the different experiences of power relationships, and how a certain amount of power can change a person based on the situation and the person. In the Stanford prison experiment, Philip Zimbardo created a prison-like environment for college students to research the effects of power structures and labeling in a prison setting.

    Read More

  • What Guideline Did They Violate?

    1622 Words  | 7 Pages

    Stanford Prison: The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment conducted at Stanford University where a mock prison was set up. Normal healthy men were split into groups of the guards and the prisoners. The two different groups conformed to their role very quickly, which resulted in physical and verbal abuse by the guards and a sense of weakness in the prisoners. This experiment was unethical because it led to lasting emotional trauma in many of the prisoners. Also Zimbaro, the leader of the experiment, found it impossible to stay neutral during the

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Research Paper

    815 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many believed that the participants should have been screened more thoroughly, and that allowing individuals with sadistic tendencies into the experiment was unethical. That being said, many believed that the results were due to the situation that the participants were put in, not their personal tendencies. The participants felt pressured to create situations that would be interesting to psychologists and so acted dramatically to create an interesting story and differently to how they would usually. They believed that it was external factors that were influencing the guards, not internal

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo

    751 Words  | 4 Pages

    In summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves

    Read More

  • Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo

    182 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was done by Phillip Zimbardo in 1971. Zimbardo’s ultimate goal was to was to investigate how fast people would conform to their roles as prison guards and prisoners. What inspired him to conduct this experiment was his interest in finding out if the brutality reported in American prisons by the prison guards was because of the guard’s behavior or the prison environment itself. Zimbardo converted a basement of the Stanford University psychology building in Stanford, California into a mock prison. Twenty-one male college students were screened for psychological normality.

    Read More

  • Theme Of The Man In The Well

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment , By

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

    Read More

  • How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform

    1676 Words  | 7 Pages

    However, the ethical decisions they made during the experiment were directly related to the roles they were assigned – the guards believed it was ‘right’ to punish and humiliate the prisoners because the prisoners were ‘bad’. As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would spiral to the point of abuse that it did. The Stanford Prison Experiment reveals the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review

    1129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Pros And Cons

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    Discussion 3 The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971, at Stanford University, California, in which a group of students were recruited to act as prison guards and prisoners to study the psychological effects of imprisonment. The experiment was supposed to last two weeks, but it was terminated after only six days due to the harmful outcomes. The prisoners suffered mental breakdowns, while the guards developed sadistic behavior, imposing physical and emotional abuse on the prisoners, violating their basic human rights. The study highlighted the power of situations and systems to transform normal individuals into abusive ones.

    Read More

More about The Stanford Jail Experiment Summary

Open Document