ipl-logo

The Stanford Prison Experiment And The Milgram Obedience Experiment

1379 Words6 Pages

In this essay I will be analyzing many components of the Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgram Obedience Experiment. The main findings of the Stanford Prison Experiment revealed that due to the power of their situational roles, participants had truly become the guards and prisoners that they impersonated. Moreover, the experiment showed how people will readily and innately conform to a social role that they are expected to play, even if it is unethical(Musen, 1988). However, there were concerns about the validity and generalizability of the experiment.
In the Stanford Prison Experiment, the use of a nonrandom, convenience sample impacts the validity of the experiment in a substantial way. The experiment cannot be claimed as valid because …show more content…

First of all, because Zimbardo was so heavily involved in the study, it would lead to experimental bias. Experimental bias is when a researcher, Zimbardo in this case, expectations of what will happen impact the interpretation of the results of the study(Buvinger, 2023). It was also confirmed by Zimbardo that his involvement in the study led to him telling the participants exactly how they should treat the prisoners. He even gave the participants an orientation over how they should behave towards the prisoners(Griggs, 2014). Since Zimbardo gave them direct commands on how to behave, he was most likely looking for the results correlated to how he told them to behave over the experiment. He may have been so focused on seeing how the guards treated their prisoners that he totally missed other big findings in the experiment. The participants who were guards also had their experiences impacted by Zimbardo. Since Zimbardo told them how to behave in the study, they felt like they had to comply and do what they were told. This is called demand characteristics, where participants may behave in ways they think are expected of them responding to Subtle or unintentional cues from experimenters(Buvinger, 2023). Because of demand characteristics, the participants did not truly act how they would which deems the results invalid. The subjectivity of the study would lead to extremely biased results in the experiment. Since Zimbardo had such a direct impact on the experiment it is fair to conclude that he would make sure the results fit his hypothesis. Furthermore, the subjectivity of the study may have contributed to the results, such as guard behavior, being padded or embellished to make him seem correct. Now I will transition to the Milgram Obedience

Show More
Related

  • Discrimination In The Stanford Prison Experiment By Zimbardo

    1415 Words  | 6 Pages

    Zimbardo would then go out of his way to have kind,intelligent, and compassionate individuals try out for his experiment, when all participants were accounted for, he appointed half the participants as prisoners and half as guards, appointing himself as the warden (The Stanford Prison Experiment). He then allowed these guards to do whatever they pleased, except for physically abuse the participants. To his shock he found that all his once kind, compassionate participants were becoming into ravenous monsters that had no idea of the true damage they were causing to the other participants, Zimbardo himself began to feel these effects. Zimbardo ended the experiment early due to these effects and the mental well being of the participants being in jeopardy . When interviewing the participants he found, that these guards did truly feel remorse, but knew they had to please the higher officials in order to feel accomplished (The Stanford Prison Experiment).

    Read More

  • The Stanford Jail Experiment Summary

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Looking at the video, Prisoner #8612 assumed that no one could leave the experiment until it was over. That is a classic example of deception by Zimbardo in the Stanford experiment. Even though he stated in the video that "he believed that we would never let him go, although we never said that," he didn’t reassure the prisoner that he could leave on his own accord. Zimbardo was not truthful with prisoner #8612, assuring him that he can leave the experiment whenever he wishes, and prisoner #8612 convinces the other prisoners that they were in a real prison and that they cannot leave until the experiment is over. That in itself lacks integrity and was

    Read More

  • Philip Zimbardo: The Lucifer Effect

    1254 Words  | 6 Pages

    Situational effects and personality come into conflict when discussing behavior. Personality is someone’s “usual pattern of behavior, feelings, and thoughts” (Twenge, 2017, p.20). It remains constant throughout different situations, but some situations can be stressful enough to make a person act out of character. The transition between a person’s normal personality and behavior to a more evil, sinister behavior fascinates a man named Philip Zimbardo, who conducted the infamous Zimbardo Prison Experiment, or Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). Zimbardo is an American psychologist at Stanford University and the mastermind behind the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment (The Story).

    Read More

  • What Is The Stanford Prison Experiment Unethical

    1784 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Stanford prison experiment – a how to guide on how not to ethically use deception and uphold duty of care. The Stanford prison experiment, conducted by Zimbardo (1971), is a study that is covered from the first year of VCE Psychology up until the very end of a master’s degree or PhD in psychology. It is renowned for the participants inhumane action and its interesting revelations about the human psyche. But the interest in the experiment goes from its findings to all the unethical conduct Zimbardo and his research assistants exhibited.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    The guards were instructed to maintain order anyway they wanted without using physical violence. Zimbardo wanted the guards to seem intimidating while the prisoners were made to look inferior and were to be referred to with their ID number only. After the prisoners were assigned their roles and the guards took their post was the effect of the experiment finally setting in. On the morning of the second day the prisoners began to rebel against the guards by ripping off their ID numbers and barring the doors while taunting the guards. This event was the first step down the slippery slope that would follow.

    Read More

  • Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment

    599 Words  | 3 Pages

    The participants were randomly selected by flipping a coin. They were either made a guard or an inmate; There were 10 inmates and 11 guards. Zimbardo wanted the “criminals” to feel like real criminals and treated like real criminals. He had the participants arrested at their own homes and taken to the police station to go through the whole process of

    Read More

  • How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform

    1676 Words  | 7 Pages

    These series of events seemed to bring out the worst in both prisoners and guards. Prisoners were losing all sense of personal identity after being referred to as numbers and not personal names this made them feel less important and they successfully believed it to be true. After six intense days of Phillip Zimbardo’s conforming to social roles experiment a graduate student who was only there to take notes and interview was so shocked by what she saw she demanded the experiment end straight away as it was degrading to watch and degrading for all who took part as Phillip Zimbardo and his team watched the situation descend into chaos she was only the voice that spoke up about how bad the experiment truly

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the article of “The Perils of Obedience”, written by Stanley Milgram, the experimenter explains that the experiment is to see how far a person could hurt a victim in a situation where he is ordered to do so. Also, in the article “The Stanford Prison

    Read More

  • Zimbardo Lord Of The Flies Morality Essay

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the 1971 study, students from Stanford University are randomly chosen to play the role of either a guard or a prisoner in a prison. The guard's job is to maintain order in the prison while the prisoners are supposed to obey the guards. Philip Zimbardo hoped that the results of the experiment would reveal if one's environment controls behavior or if one's attitude, values, and morality allow one to rise above the negative environment (Zimbardo 1:14). When reflecting on the experience an experiment guard recalls, “We were continually called upon to act in a way that just is contrary to what I really feel inside” (Zimbardo 18:45). The students who participated in the experiment act contrary to what they believe to be right because they are deprived of civilization.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Abu Ghraib

    1574 Words  | 7 Pages

    This experiment consisted of a roaster of students who were enrolled to either act as guards or inmates in an imaginary prison setting. This was to test the behavior of humans when put in a non-restrictive authority position over someone with lesser power through labeling. This experiment was set to last for two weeks, but by the sixth day, the guards had become so abusive to the ‘inmates’ that Zimbardo was forced to end the experiment early. Some of the fake inmates had to leave the experiment even earlier due to the abuse they received. After the experiment, almost all the students who participated as guards felt guilty about their actions.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Are Humans Born Good Or Evil?

    815 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the video “The Stanford Prison Experiment (Part 2)” Michale Steven concluded: “We brought in people who had very different personalities that those Zimbardo chose. We put them in a situation that did not demand things from them and they behaved accordingly to that personality” (30:00-30:10). This exhibited an experiment that is a development of the original “Stanford Prison Experiment” with improved techniques. It was an experiment in which Steve selected participants who scored high in morals from numerous personality tests and placed them in a dark room where they couldn't see the other participants. And had them attempt to complete a puzzle and give them the option to play an alarming sound for the other participants that didn’t exist which they had control of the volume.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    He is a selfish psychologist who just wanted to get a result. He did not realize that he is starting to act like a prison superintendent than a researcher. He only realizes it when Christina Maslach, objected the experiment after she saw that the prisoners were being harassed by the guards. Even if the study has received a lot of ethical criticism, the result still helps Zimbardo to make a conclusion that is helpful for his future endeavor in research.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review

    1129 Words  | 5 Pages

    Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Essay

    1499 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo, aimed to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power and authority within a simulated prison environment. The experiment sought to explore how individuals' behavior and attitudes might be influenced by the roles they assume. Zimbardo and his team set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University's psychology department. They recruited 24 male participants who were deemed mentally and emotionally stable for the study. The participants were randomly assigned either the role of a prisoner or a guard.

    Read More

  • Causes And Effects Of The Stanford Prison Study

    426 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Study The Stanford Prison Experiment was a social psychology study conducted by Stanford University psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971. The study was designed to investigate the psychological effects of power and authority on individuals and was intended to last two weeks. However, it was terminated after only six days due to the extreme behavior of the participants (Leithead, 2011).

    Read More

More about The Stanford Prison Experiment And The Milgram Obedience Experiment

Open Document