Stanford Prison Experiment

The parallels between the Stanford Prison and Abu Ghirab Prison are strong because in both cases because in both cases, people were being humiliated, degraded and dehumanized. Zimbaro explain that in his experiment the scenes from the Abu Ghirab Prison were “interchangeable”. In the Stanford Prison Experiment, healthy men who had clean backgrounds participated in the experiment ad ended up behaving in a way that they themselves could not predict. The similarities also occurred in the Ghirab Prison when the members of the military who lacked a criminal record, and passed the military psychological tests were now found guilty of “dehumanizing, demeaning, innocent” others in a manner that we know as “evil”. For example, when the US soldiers who were seen as good members dehumanized the Arab civilians, the environment had othered them in their minds like what occurred in the video of the Stanford Experiment when the student who became a guard mentioned that he had to speak to himself and think of the prisoners as inferior.

In Philip Zimbardo the Stanford prison experiment usage of situational variables to observe the changes in behavior exemplify the concept deindividuation. Those selected to participate in the experiment have been assigned specific roles were stripped of their identity and became absorbed by the role. Prisoners were assigned numbers and were treated inhumanly by guard who let the feeling of absolute power influence their actions. I agree with your claim that the guards acted without thinking, I believe they were solely motivated by the sensation of having power over another rather than the promise of monetary gain. If the experiment was more controlled and conducted in today’s modern society the results would have slightly considering minimum

This connects to the idea of guards having the capability of turning evil through an atmosphere of the prison environment where they can turn evil and have no remorse feelings towards the prisoners. From the article, "Stanford Prison Experiment," by Saul McLeod, he explained that the evil tactics that were made by the guards were from the atmosphere of the prison environment because the norm for a prison guard is to act tough and have no remorse feelings towards the prisoners when assigning punishments. He also added that guards acted this way because they lost their sense of personal identity when they dressed up as a guard, which can show they may have believed that they were actual guards and the experiment was real, which might’ve triggered their dark side with harsh punishments. Therefore, losing their personal identity in a prison environment may have been the factor where they triggered their evil side during the prison

It can be argued that one of the main reasons for conducting studies that may seem unethical are necessary to dispel idealistic beliefs such as the just-world phenomenon, we may have about the justice system in this case, as well as the influence psychologists may have in correctional facilities. As observed in the Stanford Prison Experiment - a mere simulation involving completely innocent civilians role playing as prisoners and guards, such an intense result prevailed that the experiment had to be prematurely shut down. Furthermore, the experimenter himself got so taken with the experiment that experimenters with a clear and objective view of the experiment realized the distressing effects the experiment was having on the participants. (Wagner, 2007) The concept of obedience to authority was revolutionized following Milgram’s 1963, 1965 and 1974 studies.

This question makes his readers think, stirring readers emotions on the situation, appealing to the listeners fear and values, using pathos is part of making his essay strong. Chapman broaches prisons, explaining the “advantages” of having prisons, first being humane, second was to purge the criminals crime through rehabilitation. Then stated how the United States adapted imprisonment as a for of punishment, which had five functions retribution, specific deterrence, general deference, presentation, and rehabilitation. After this statement Chapman counters argues by asking his audience if the above criteria actually is effective. Punishment is possibly the only thing that's accomplished according to Chapman, he beloved prison is ineffective, rehabilitation works, but not the way they intended for it to work for all those who are incarcerated.

Human contact with others is practically nonexistent. Solitary confinement is is a practice that is decided upon by the discretion of the prison staff. According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation over 500 prisoners at Pelican Bay State Prison in California have been isolation for over a decade

The prisoners mostly were killers and bank

In 1971 Professor Phillip Zimbardo was interested in finding out what would happen if you put a good person in an evil place. Would the institution control their behavior or would a person attitude, values, morality raise about the negative environment? First, Zimbardo converted a basement of Stanford University into a mock prison, Next, Zimbardo recruiter 24 male college students who were paid $15 per day to take part in the experiment. Finally, the recruiters were randomly assigned to either prisoner or guard with Zimbardo being the make shift prison warden. I believe the prison study was unethical, clearly young men suffered physically, mentally.

(para.6). In other words these social psychologies wanted

According to the study performed by Catherine Marcum, Carly Hilinski-Rosick and Tina Freiburger, the factors in both the deprivation and importation models can influence inmate rule violations. However, the model that I believe seems to make the most logical sense is the deprivation model. Deprivation theory suggests that inmate socialization was a specific response to the losses suffered while an individual was imprisoned (Sykes, 1958). In other words, it argues that prison life in general was degrading and can be so stigmatizing that inmates tended to act out aggressively or through violating the rules.

This is in contrast to the idea that our behavior is related to internal factors. If our behavior was related to the internal factors only, then the prisoners would have been able to go along with the experiment and not be traumatically transformed within a matter of days. This external factors determining a behavioral change is also shown in the experiments, conducted by Stanley Milgram, in his obedience of authority of participants to deliver life threating shocks to other

Explain the concept of prison as a total institution. Prison as total institution can be explained as a place of work and residence that bar individuals from rest of the society due to the similar circumstances. Indicate some of the reasons for violent behavior in prisons. There can be number of reasons for violent behavior in the prison. But it 's mostly done to prove the strength among other prisoners.

This can easily parallel as those Romanian children who were abandoned or forced to leave the only lives they’ve known are very likely to be anxious, if not also depressed. Additionally, these children had lower perceived self-worth than non-users. While the intentions of banning abortions was for people to live a more “moral” lifestyle, this imposition of morals led to a younger generation of impoverished and homeless children turning into drug users – the unintended

Some reforms that have been built around the promise of public interest are the prison institutions, businesses, political machines, and voting rights. Before their reformation, these systems were oppressing minority communities from thriving. Before there was a prison system, citizens who chose not to follow the law were brutally punished. Then during the 1800s, the early stages of prison systems were developed.

Results demonstrated that proportional causality was found to happen between bystander intervention and bystander efficiency. In addition, a last model showed indirect impacts of an bystander intervention program on bystander behaviors through both bystander intervention and bystander efficiency at distinctive time points. The existing study displays the Men 's Project, a sexual assault prevention program that focuses on college men. The Men’s Project incorporates social standards, compassion, and bystander education programs into one program for college men. Male student pioneers were enlisted to take an 11-week program for 2 hours every week.