The Zimbardo’s prison experiment, also known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, main purpose was to investigate the influence of situational factors on behavior (Brady & Logsdon, 705). This ‘constructed situation’ involved young, male volunteers being cast in the dichotomized roles of guard and prisoner in a simulated prison environment (Bottoms, 163). The experiment was use to see if brutality truly existed between the guards and the prisoners. The findings were quite upsetting. The young males went through an ordeal that eventually lead to psychological abuse.
The young adults were treated like actual criminals, even arrested at their own homes. They were later brought into the pretend jail and booked. Many individuals would assume by working
…show more content…
Some of the prisoners’ started acting irrationally and they started telling lies on each other and some even started siding with the guards. Witnessing this type of behavior was quite strange I couldn’t understand why the prisoners would tell lies on each other. Perhaps the prisoners felt by doing this they would no longer receive such harsh punishment but that wasn’t the case at all. The prisoners did whatever it took to please the guards. The more submissive the prisoners became the more hostile the guards’ behavior got. The prisoners took the abused over and over. The guards wanted complete control over the prisoners but that type of behavior didn’t last long at all. After thirty six or so hours some of the prisoners showed signs of severe psychosomatic disturbance and had to be released shortly after (Brady & Logsdon, 706). A few hours later a few prisoners retaliated and blocked themselves into their cells. It would appear that the prisoners got tired of the harassment and therefore acted out. The guards took back control of the situation and detained the so called ringleaders. The agitators were placed in solitary confinement and shortly after the prisoners’ behavior changed dramatically. One prisoner became absolutely hostile and started screaming uncontrollable. Perhaps because the prisoner was isolated he became anxious and was unable to control his unnecessary outburst. To me solitary confinement is a form of psychological torture. All alone in a room all that is left to do is to go crazy and that’s exactly what happened to the prisoners. The prisoners’ conditions were too severe that they had to be released. The experiment was designed to last for two weeks but after six short days the experiment was terminated (Brady & Logsdon,
In the prison the prisoner had their cells. The cells were just a room with a bed and a toilet, and there were cells to punish them There was a cell named the dark cell, the cell was only 15 feet by 15 feet the prisoners would be locked in that cell for days depending on what they did and how bad it was. When the prisoners were in the cell they could not talk to anyone. For food the prisoners only got a bread and water once a day, they were stripped in their underwear in the cell. The cell had a cage like outter layer for when the prison guards would give the inmates food, they wouldn’t try to escape.
They would become lost in thought, and their faces showed a certain sadness that I had never seen before." (Wiesel 52) The emotional distance exhibited by the guards serves to further dehumanize the prisoners and to make them feel isolated and
Before they would die, the prisoners would be treated like “automatons” and “filthy sons of bitches” (Wiesel 81). Wiesel writes, “Pitch darkness. Every now and then, an explosion in the night. They had orders to fire anyone who could not keep up. Their fingers on the triggers, they did not deprive themselves of this pleasure.
In the six days that the experiment ran they saw the personalities that the prisoner and prison guards took.
In 1992, several prisoners of war were released after being contained in detention camps in the former country of Yugoslavia. Upon their arrival, they were examined using EEG-like tests. Several months afterwards the recordings revealed brain abnormalities; the most severe cases were found in prisoners who had either received head trauma that was strong enough to leave them unconscious, or prisoners who were placed in “solitary confinement.” This suggests that as these prisoners were, according to the article, “without sustained social interaction,” they became mentally unstable thus leaving them in a state where they find themselves “trembling sometimes for no
In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The
The guards were instructed to maintain order anyway they wanted without using physical violence. Zimbardo wanted the guards to seem intimidating while the prisoners were made to look inferior and were to be referred to with their ID number only. After the prisoners were assigned their roles and the guards took their post was the effect of the experiment finally setting in. On the morning of the second day the prisoners began to rebel against the guards by ripping off their ID numbers and barring the doors while taunting the guards. This event was the first step down the slippery slope that would follow.
Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.
At work, if prisoners rested for a moment, made a mistake, or looked at a camp official the wrong way, they would be viciously beaten. If they weren’t working, the camp officials would still beat the prisoners just because they could. Sometimes, these beatings resulted in death.
Back in 1971 there was a prison experiment that took place in Stanford University and it explains clearly why these cases happen in the prison and jail environment. Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist did this study to show what kind of behavior happens when they people are given authority and it also shows how they use their power affecting the situation they are put into. In this research paper we are going to visit the case of Los Angeles Men’s central jail and find out what went wrong. We will also take a look into what happened in Abu Gharib prison and see if this is an ongoing trend in the correction facilities. We will then look back on the Stanford Prison study conducted by the psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971 to see if this experiment truly proves that behavior does change resulting in the abuse of the inmates by the officers.
The prisoners went through the same schedule every day and if they didn’t follow regulation, they were sent to spend isolation for days,weeks, or even months. Prisoners slowly went insane as “The Rock” beat them down to nothing. Thirteen escape attempts involving 33 men all ended tragically. But one attempt involving Frank Morris, Allen West, and Clarence and John Anglin will always be
They were stripped naked and had all their personal possessions removed. They were only given a prison dress and has a chain on their right foot. On the other hand, the guards wore identical khakis. They were instructed to do whatever they thought is right to maintain law and order in the prison. But they are not given a permission to abuse the prisoners physically.
Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.
The experiment mainly focused on the participants appearance, for example prisoners were dressed into prison clothes for feeling more demeaned and humiliated, however at the same time guards were dressed into like real guards with sunglasses for appearing more detached and less humane. The results were terrifying because the guards took the matter seriously and sometimes harassed the prisoners with the help pf physical punishment, or even
While the test subjects did in fact consent to the experiment via documents, they developed this false understanding through the experiment that they could not leave at any time, that “there was no way out”. During this time period, there were no existing laws that this experiment violated but it did pave the way for several to be introduced. For example, in the consent form it stated that the prisoners would not experience physical harm, but several days later they were brutally beaten by the guards. A few scenarios such as this one would be considered illegal with today’s legal system. One law that was created after this required federal prisons to separate minors awaiting trial from adults to avoid them suffering from abuse.