ABSTRACT:
The study tends to depict how Eliot treated women as mere second sex in his poetry. It further explores Eliot’s misogynic, female-hater temperament and the reasons behind this abhorrence against women. The subjugation of women, throughout centuries, from ancient to present time has been done by male in patriarchal society. Eliot in his poetry, through the allusions of myth, history, religion, literature and philosophy not only narrates the degenerated state of women but also contributes to it by his fun, ridicule and satire of women. Instead of breaking the notion of patriarchy, Eliot becomes a torch-bearer of patriarchy and contributes to perpetuate the process subjugation of women by strengthening the mechanisms of women subordination.
…show more content…
It is male-centered and male-controlled. The mechanism is maneuvered in such a way as to subordinate women to men in all cultural domains: familial, religious, political, economic, social, legal, scientific, artistic and so on. From the time of the Ramayana and the Mahabharata, the Vedic civilization, the Iliad and the Odyssey, the Hebrew Bible and the Greek philosophy through the Middle Ages, to the present, the fair sex tends to be defined by negative traits to the male as the human norm, hence as an Other, by her lack of male powers and of the male character traits that are presumed, in the patriarchal view, to have achieved the memorable inventions and works of civilization. In the process the women themselves are taught to assimilate the patriarchal view of male as the superior and female as the subordinator to male and are so conditioned to derogate and degrade their own sex and thus to cooperate in the process of their own degeneration and subordination. Aristotle’s comment may be cited in this respect. He said in Politics, “Again, as between the sexes, the male is by nature superior and the female inferior, the male ruler and the female subject. And the same must also necessarily apply in the case of mankind as a whole; therefore all men that differ as widely as the soul does from the body and the human being from the lower animal (and this is the condition of those whose function is the use of the body and from whom this is the best that is forthcoming) these are by nature slaves, for whom to be governed by this kind of authority [20] is advantageous, inasmuch as it is advantageous to the subject things already mentioned.” The concept of male prerogatives and female subordination is largely a cultural construct that is generated by the dominant patriarchal biases of our civilization. As Simone de Beauvoir put it, “One is not born, but rather becomes a woman …. It
It was widely believed that men were stronger, braver and more powerful than women. On the contrary, women were passive, dependent and powerless compared with men. The biological conventions that men always physically had more strength than women were rooted in almost everyone’s mind. Even most women believed that they were inferior to men and they needed men to provide protection for them. The biological difference was the first reason that women were treated unequally for a long time in the history.
In the article “Traditions Subordinating Women”, Bonnie S. Anderson and Judith P. Zinsser explore the very strong opinions, theories and beliefs of female subordination within the eyes of various origin cultures through stories, passages and history itself. This article gives a vast understanding of a woman’s role, the purpose of her body, what is expected of her, society’s double standards and how literature and poems portray women. Before Christianity, there existed many old cultures such as the Greeks, Romans, Hebrews, Germanics and Celtics, who all came in agreement to preserving the subordination of women. A woman’s main duties were to remain faithful to her husband, to be fruitful and to preserve and nurture her home. A woman was incapable
Even in Puritan era, a woman who was more intelligent than men will be burned to dead. However, now day women are freer than women in the past. They have political right. They also are allowed to study. This paper also will tell how Cisneros criticized the man domination through some characters such as Sally.
The bubonic plague drastically changed medieval European society. It weakened the economy and affected the role women play in society. The black death sparked religious movements and shaped beliefs. The Mongols occupied an area extending from Russia to China. Therefore, there were many trade roads in the empire, and Mongol rule kept Eurasian trade avenues in check.
Furthermore, Feminist Criticism provides a better view of literature because it shows that women can be powerful. When Emilia finds out that her husband has been plotting an evil plan she says,” Tis proper I obey him, but not now”(Othello V.2.195). Emilia refuses to help her husband after she finds the cruel intentions he has despite the expectation of women always being submissive to their husbands. Women also have a voice and feelings, they are capable of defying their husbands commands when they know what he expects is simply wrong. In a literary article,The Role of Women in Othello: A Feminist Reading states that,” Society weighs heavily on the shoulders of women; they feel that they must support the men and defer to them, even if the actions of the men are questionable” (Literary Articles).
Different societies view women in different lights. Therefore, a woman’s position is greatly different from one society to the other. The societies in question do not necessarily have to exist at the same time. Even in the same time frame, two societies could exist, where one treat women as equals to men, and another that treats women differently than men, whether better or worse. The societies in question are: Mesopotamia, Greece, China, Rome & Europe, and this essay aims to study different societies’ viewpoints on women, and to compare and contrast them against each other.
Men represent their wives and families in the public sphere. To Locke, “the subjection of women (wives) to men (husbands) is not an example of political domination and subordination.” (53) This is because no man has the power of life and death over his wife or anyone else. (53) To Rousseau, “civil order depends on the right of husbands over their wives.” (53) The natural attributes of women cause them to live without reason, to rely solely on their emotions and desires, because of this, women should not and cannot be allowed in ‘civil society’ as with their inclusion comes its downfall.
Feminist literary criticism’s primary argument is that female characters have always been presented from a male’s viewpoint. According to Connell, in most literary works, female characters often play minor roles which emphasize their domestic roles, subservience and physical beauty while males are always the protagonists who are strong, heroic and dominant (qtd. in Woloshyn et al.150). This means that the women are perceived as weak and are supposed to be under the control of men. Gill and Sellers say that feminist literary criticism’s approach involves identifying with female characters in order to challenge any male centred outlook.
Eliot uses tradition and personal innovation, combined with the revitalization of the twentieth-century British poetry, which leads to poems full of vitality. Based on the poem “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” this paper explores the poet 's exploration and innovation in the aspects of poetic skills and content. The early works of Eliot are in a low tone, and he often uses association, metaphor, and suggestion to express modern people 's depression. The famous poem “The love song of J. Alfred Prufrock" uses the inner monolog of the protagonist’s desire to love and fear of the contradictory attitude of love to illustrate modern emptiness and cowardice. From the content, the reader gradually learns the poem is about a middle-aged man.