The Suffragette: The History of the Women’s Militant Suffrage Movement (1911) was written in terms of the situation of suffragettes at the time, a moment in which the suffragettes and their actions were an issue for British politics. It can be seen as a chronology about the progression that the suffragette movement had from the early days of the organization until 1910. Another characteristic of this book is that it is written by a woman closely related to the organization, who could provide a different point of view for the readers to the one that they could possible had about the suffragettes; besides, this book was meant to show the readers the reason behind why those women fought and which were their motives and ideals. It is known …show more content…
The Police had made more expensive preparations to prevent any meeting being held (Pankhurst, 251).
Considering the previous fragment, it can be appreciated the new posture that the Government took in relation to suffragettes, but also it is noticeable how despite this meeting was meant to be peaceful police was there to prevent that meeting to happen. It can be interpreted that even during the peaceful stage of the suffragette movement the fear towards women getting power was present, otherwise there was no reason to prohibit a peaceful meeting. Another interesting situation during this event is that there were men supporting women, and, even, protecting them, in words of Sylvia Pankhurst:
Some groups of the men stood with linked arms around the women [...] pushed little bands of suffragettes forward against the rows of constables with the cries of “Votes for women”, “we’ll get you to the House of Commons”, and “back up the women and push them through!” (Pankhurst, 1911;
…show more content…
On the one hand, this is a clear sign of rebellion towards the one in power, in other words, the Government ruled by men. On the other hand, it can be seen that they actually did not have any other option since their words would not convince the Government to provide them the rights to vote.
To sum up, in this book we are presented different situations that suffragettes had to go through, but if the period of time, and society’s mentality there are several aspects that can be pointed out. First, after the negative of the Government, manifestation organized by suffragettes would have the presence of police forces which were hostile to them; second, in an initial stage suffragettes had people’s support, both men and women; thirdly, it can be seen that the Government was, without any doubt, the main obstacle suffragettes had to deal with, in term of law and trials suffragette were diminished; finally, the rebellious attitude, in terms of the use of violence, that women chose was because their arguments, speeches and peaceful actions were not working: and that was the last option they had to make their voice
“Deeds Not Words” is an article by Diane Atkinson that examines the fateful suicidal protest of Emily Wilding Davison and its connection to a particular method of modern terrorism. Atkinson believes the modern suicide bombers and the fighters of the Edwardian suffragette movement as Davison are one and the same. They both are trying to fight for their beliefs and feel the need to resort to drastic measures to get their message heard. Emily Wilding Davison’s historic protest on Derby Day, June 4th, 1913, was not the first of her many controversial protests for the suffragette militancy.
Women used many different methods to earn the right to vote in the Women’s Suffrage Movement. One method women used to earn support is that they organized a parade in Washington, D.C., the same day the president was coming into town so that there was large crowds. Many of the people in the crowd were men who, along with drinking also disagreed with the right for women to vote. They began to yell then even throw objects at the women walking in the parade. Eventually, the police walked away giving the men the opportunity to attack.
World War one and the beginning of the 20th century set up the atmosphere for the rest of the century. Women’s effect on the war, the revolution Lenin was preparing Russian to happen, Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams, Keynes’ The Economic Consequences of the Peace, and the Great Depression all made an effect on the 20th century. These and others added up to the problems and concerns of the 20th century. In the late 19th century many women began the fight for suffrage.
They fought this battle by stating that the 14th and 15th amendments were in violation, that they were not truly citizens without the right to vote. They would have rallies trying to make their point across. To help spread awareness of women's suffrage, two different organizations were
Both working class and wealthy women joined together to rally and champion for union leagues, such as the Women’s Trade Union League specifically mentioned in Triangle. Leagues such as this one were fueled by the anger and injustice factory women felt toward their employers. One such worker was Clara Lemlich, a young factory worker who was “a model of a new sort of woman, hungry for opportunity and education and even equality; willing to fight the battles and pay the price to achieve it (7).” In the world Clara lived in, “men had the vote; men owned the shops…men ran the unions and political parties (7)” and she and her comrades wanted to change all of that. They knew that if they wanted to achieve change, they would have to do themselves, because male factory workers, even though they faced the same trials, often saw these women as a threat and police officers almost always sided with factory owners (12).
Document 4 shows a petition made by the London Workingmen’s Association in an attempt to, “enact that every person producing proof of his being 21 years of age shall be entitled to have his name registered as a voter.” In 1838, the time that this petition was created, it was mainly nobles and upper class citizens who had the right to vote, so it makes sense that the working men of Europe wish for male suffrage because then they have the ability to elect people whom they believe will better improve their lives. Document 5 introduces a woman activist, Flora Tristan, who wants universal working rights for all citizens in the, “universal union of working men and women.” Document 8 introduces another woman activist, Pauline Roland, who claims that, “as soon as a woman comes of age, she has the right to arrange her life as she wishes.” Women have historically been undermined in the working society through such laws as the Factory Law or the Mines Act, which left women without work or having less hours.
During Progressive Era, there were many reforms that occurred, such as Child Labor Reform or Pure Food and Drug Act. Women Suffrage Movement was the last remarkable reform, and it was fighting about the right of women to vote, which was basically about women’s right movement. Many great leaders – Elizabeth Cad Stanton and Susan B. Anthony - formed the National American Women Suffrage Association (NAWSA). Although those influential leaders faced hardship during this movement, they never gave up and kept trying their best. This movement was occurred in New York that has a huge impact on the whole United States.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, American society began to focus on the welfare of minority groups. Women’s suffrage and abolition were rooted as deeply as the history of America, but asylum and prison reform sprouted with the Second Great Awakening, a movement that occurred in the early 1800s. The Second Great Awakening was led by religious leaders who advocated for changes in American society through the unity of the American people (Doc. Due to the Second Great Awakening, reform movements were established between 1825 and 1850 in order to represent the changes the people sought for in the issues of slavery, suffrage, and asylum and prison reform. The social aspect of the abolition movement led to the visible democratic changes in society and politics.
Women Suffrage movement began more active after 1894. For example, “In New York City, Josephine Shaw Lowell and Mary Putnam Jacobi formed the Woman Municipal League." (Dubois, 189) This organization was primary focusing on the corruption of public. “By the early 1900s, moreover, the spirit of political reform in New York City spread beyond the elite.”
It was an enormous social change for women to take part in public decision making, and gave them a voice to abolish unjust laws. The suffragettes in Australia argued that they were intelligent enough to vote, that it was unfair for them to be taxed without representation, and that they were equal to men therefore should have equal rights. In contrary, the suffragettes’ opponents alleged that women already had indirect power through manipulating their husbands and father’s voting choices at the ballot box, that women were equal but different and that women could not fulfil the duties of citizenship therefore should not vote. The suffragettes encouraged people to sign their petition, as well as held meeting and debates in order to gain supporters. Women in Australia used civil methods of protest, and didn’t adapt the more radical methods used by suffragettes in other countries.
Women’s Suffrage Movement If you had lived in the 1800s, would you have fought for Women’s Rights or would you have decided to be a bystander? Throughout history women have always been ruled by men. At the start of the 1800s, women would have had only one right and that was being a housewife. Although women had no rights, women later raised their voices in the Women’s Suffrage Movement.
Although Mill was very keen on women being giving the rights to vote he was not taken by the idea of women become independent from their husbands. It is well known that the suffragettes contributed a great deal in which women were given the rights to vote worldwide. The suffragette movement didn’t begin to take place up until 1890. There were seventeen individual groups who came together all supporting the women’s suffrage. This included the London Society for Women’s Suffrage, Manchester Society for Women’s Suffrage and the Central Committee for Women’s Suffrage.
Thank you, Millicent Fawcett, for giving me the opportunity to speak on behalf of the National Union of Women 's Suffrage Societies which Millicent leads with grace and dignity. Some of you may know me and some of you may not, but I am Clementine Forest one of 3000 women suffragists who has marched here today, the largest march ever occurred, for the cause of women 's suffrage. I am here to represent and express the importance of women receiving the right to vote. Unfortunately, the London weather wasn 't on our side with the presence of heavy rain throughout our march from Hyde Park to Exter Hall, but this reinforces that nothing will stop women from protesting their right to vote. As you know we have been gathered together as one, today on February 9th, 1907, the day in which Parliament is open once again for the coming year.
Suffrages chose to take a more militant style approach to capture the attention of the government in a way that could not be ignored. They became a public nuisance in terms of publically demonstrating their frustration through actions rather than words. In “Freedom or Death,” Pankhurst speaks on behalf of the suffrage women, “we were called militant, and were quite willing to accept the name. We were determined to press this question of the enfranchisement of women to the point where we were no longer ignored by the politicians” (Pankhurst, 2). Though militant had a negative association, the suffragists prided their actions fighting for an honourable peace.
Part C: Analyse and evaluate representation of history Representation1 Representation 1 highly shows accurate as it was true that the suffragist and suffragettes appealed to mainly middle and upper class- (middle) class educated women. The dates of the event is true, it’s accuracy has been shown due to the information being taken from the textbook, which gives and expands good content , such as the National League for opposing women suffrage was founded in 1911, which proves to be true. Representation1, shows how unbiased the context was and that the text was balanced and no fabricated information was copied because it was only the press who reported all the events into the newspaper. It also shows completeness, as although the suffragette