accordingly and have remained very low with as much as 300-500% difference in salaries between the public and private sector. Attempts have been made to compensate for the salary abrasion, however, that increase was soon battered by inflation. The basic cost of living, employee skills and the demand for labour, should be taken into consideration when deciding on an appropriate remuneration for staff to prevent leaving the public servant demoralized, angry and ready to resort to corrupt practices given
provided to the humans and the importance of such activity. The ethical principles not only have impact on the research subjects but, also will influence the people affected by the research outcomes. The three basic ethical principles in medical research practice are respect for people receiving
nursing professional practice is guided by the ethical theories and principles, hence the significance of this concept. All the ethical theories such as teleological theories and deontological theory have implications in the practice of nursing care. Ethical theories aid
laws through three principles: the harm principle, legal paternalism, and libertarian paternalism. Mill’s harm principle only allows the government to create laws that impede an individual’s liberty to harm others. Whereas legal paternalism, according to Dworkin, allows laws to restrict an individual’s liberty for the individual’s own good. Thaler and Sunstein’s libertarian paternalism is different from Dworkin’s in how the paternalistic restrictions take place. The basis of all three is preventing
on. Krasner defines regimes as “sets of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around which actors’ expectations converge in a given area of international relations.” Principles are the foundation of a regime and are statements about how the world should work. The second, norms, are standards or guidelines of behavior. Rules are specific and concrete prescriptions for action. Lastly, decision- making behaviors are prevailing
of doctrine of separation of power in India In 1748, The principle of separation of powers enunciated by French Jurist Montesquieu in his book L. Esprit Des Lois (Spirit of Laws) for the first time with a with a view to protect individual liberty from any unwarranted authoritarian and absolute concentration of power in one entity. Montesquieu 's doctrine signifies the fact that one person or body of persons should not exercise all the three powers of the Government - legislative, executive and judiciary
given (Case & Fair, 1999). The ten principles of economics depend on this definition and are the essentials of microeconomics studies. There are three components of the ten principles: how individuals decide, how individuals interface, how the business sector acts overall. In order to choose how to divide the limited resources available fairly and efficiently, we have to face many situations in which we have to make decisions. In economics studies, decision – making is a very crucial skill in every
should be applied to our legal system and to the law-making bodies. St. Thomas Aquinas and John Finnis both represent ancient and modern natural law respectively and both believe that natural law should be applicable to our society. On the other hand, legal positivism is the belief that law, and morality are two separate entities. Some notable theorists that believe legal positivism should be applied to our legal system as well as to our law-making bodies include, H.L.A Hart and Ronald Dworkin. This
powers no one person or body should be vested with all three types of powers and there must be a division of functions on the basis that the legislature should make laws but not administer or enforce them, the executive must administer the made laws but neither influence the legislature in the making of the laws nor stand in judgment of the same and the judiciary must determine rights and uphold justice without taking over the functions of law-making or administration. It was further explicated that such
said that: “a precedent is an adjudged case or decision of a higher court considered as furnishing an example or authority for an identical or similar question afterwards arising on similar question of law”