ipl-logo

The Three-Fifths Compromise

146 Words1 Page

Eventually, the delegates compromised on the slavery issue as well. Slaves were declared to count as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of population counts. However, neither the word slavery nor slave was used in the Constitution. Rather, it refers to the Three-Fifths Compromise as applying to “all other persons.”Still, it was apparent whom the Three-Fifths Compromise targeted, since it went a step further and addressed the issue of the African slave trade. Northerners expected the African slave trade to dwindle and eventually become unnecessary, and they wanted the Constitution to reflect that expectation. Southerners only knew that they had an immediate and ongoing need for slave labor in their fields and paddies, so they resisted

Show More
Related

  • The House Of Representatives: The Great Compromise

    54 Words  | 1 Pages

    all states were represented equally in the Senate. This made the smaller states happy. In the House of Representatives, representation was based on population. This pleased the bigger states. The Great Compromise settled the method of representation in the legislative branch.

    Read More

  • Three Fifth Compromise

    436 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first overseeing report of the United States was the Articles of Confederation, embraced by the Continental Congress in 1777 amid the Revolutionary War, before the United States was formerly a nation. This structure laid out a powerless national government and solid state governments. The national government couldn't charge, couldn't uphold laws it passed, and couldn't direct business. These and different shortcomings, alongside an expansion in national feeling, prompted the Constitutional Convention, which met from May to September 1787.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Articles Of Confederation Between 1781 And 1787

    465 Words  | 2 Pages

    The three-fifths compromise reached between delegates from northern and southern states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It consisted on that slaves should be counted when determining the state population, for legislative representation and taxing purposes. The compromise was proposed by James Wilson and Roger Sherman.

    Read More

  • Roger Sherman Dbq Analysis

    1680 Words  | 7 Pages

    Instead, they countered back with the concept of slaves being counted for taxation purposes. Along with this, the north wanted to end the slave trade. South rejected this proposition, because slaves were essential to their economy. Delegates wanted a compromise to end the issue without discussing slavery in the Constitution. This led to the three-fifths compromise which delegates eventually agreed to.

    Read More

  • Apush Chapter 1 Outline

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    a) When it came to levying taxes, Congress would count slaves as three fifths of a person when determining population. E. Slavery in the Constitution 1. The slavery clauses in the Constitution were designed upon compromise as to not upset states that were strongly for or against slavery. a) After twenty years, Congress banned the importation of new African slaves on the first day they were allowed to. b)

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise

    1231 Words  | 5 Pages

    As leaders of the nascent nation entered the Constitutional Convention of 1787, they aimed to unify the country under a set of common laws and values. During this process, the delegates were divided on the topic of slavery, in terms of how it would affect the way states were represented in Congress and how states were taxed by the national government. After many proposals, the delegates arrived at the three-fifths compromise, which valued slaves as 3/5th of free persons for the purposes of representation and taxation. If a true compromise is an agreement in which the parties involved make equal concessions, then the three-fifths compromise was not a true compromise because it favored the South by giving it disproportionate power in the national

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Three Fifths Compromise

    1157 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Three-Fifths Compromise is between the North and the South. The issue they were arguing over is whether a slave should be counted as a part of the state’s population, which determines how many representatives the state can select. The North had a population mostly that was comprise of white man. They believed that slaves shouldn’t be counted as a person since they were not citizens and didn’t have the rights to vote. However, the South disagreed because the majority of their population was slaves.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    959 Words  | 4 Pages

    In return, the free states argued that if slaves are considered property, then they should not be counted for in a state’s population and if they are accounted for then they are considered individuals, not property. Upon hearing this, slave states said they would not approve the ratification of the Constitution unless their slaves were counted for in the House of Representatives. A compromise was then made, and it was called the 3/5 Compromise. As a result, only 3/5 of the slave population in these slaves' states were counted for in

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Influence The Constitution

    1018 Words  | 5 Pages

    After the Articles of Confederation failed because they failed to give enough power to the national government and congress, our founding father’s needed to reflect on its flaws for a new system to be set in place. Their new creation, our Constitution, was then set into place, and was created from a basis of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation directly influence the Constitution by its failure by changing some of the responsibilities of the federal and state governments. The Articles of Confederation gave too much power to the states, and the Constitution changed that.

    Read More

  • The 3-5 Compromise: What Is The 3/5 Compromise?

    237 Words  | 1 Pages

    The 3/5 compromise is stating that slaves are only counted as 3/5 of a person on a census as id believe is so wrong and demeaning to do that just because of a different skin color or religion and culture. Back in those days the colonist or most of them thought that white Christians were superior to all other cultures and religions, so when it came to making a census and whether or not slaves should be counted or not they just thought hey! Even though there is a whole person standing in front of me I’m just going to count them as 3/5 just because they work for me and there are my property and aren’t like me. There are so many reason as too why this is wrong but first I’m going to say that nowhere in the bible does god ever say either that

    Read More

  • Compromise Of New Jersey Essay

    658 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Constitutional Convention, delegates were considering how to distribute representation for each state, consequently, the question regarding whether slaves should be counted towards the population arose. Southern states feared that not counting slaves as a part of their populations would give them less representatives in Congress, thus allowing larger Northern states, like Massachusetts, Virginia, and Pennsylvania to overwhelm, and out vote the South in issues regarding slave trade. Likewise, the North did not want to surrender their population advantage in Congress either. The compromise they reached was set forth in Article 1, Section 2 of the United States constitution. The compromise they reached arbitrarily counted every five slaves as three individuals.

    Read More

  • The Great Sympromises And The Three-Fifths Compromise

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    At this time, slaves were not counted as anything for taxes or population. The South proposes that their slaves should be counted as part of their total population. Northerners object to this, obviously, because they wanted to continue having more representation and voice than the South. The Constitutional Convention decided upon the Three-Fifths Compromise. This compromise stated that every five slaves would count for three people.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Great Compromise And The Three Fifths Compromise

    360 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States constitution has been named a bundle of compromises because the delegates to the Constitutional convention in 1787 had to compromise on many different main ideas in order to establish a new enhanced constitution that is suitable to each of states. Two compromises that had a significant impact on American society and made the United States constitution become a reality are The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise. The moral issue is the lack of representation in Congress. Representation in Congress was dealt with at the Constitutional Convention and has had significant impact on American society. Thus leading to the topic The Great Compromise.

    Read More

  • Why Did Texas Fight In The Civil War Essay

    560 Words  | 3 Pages

    Southerners believed that the U.S. was made for and by the white race, and that the Africans had no part of their establishment. They believed that slaves were justified by the “..experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the almighty creator.” (Document B.) They did not want to give up their businesses or their beliefs too soon therefore, they

    Read More

  • The Great Compromise Research Paper

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    “By the time of the convention, nine-tenths of the slaves in the United States lived in the South,” (History Alive, pg153.). The Three-Fifths Compromise allowed the enormous number of slaves in the south to partially count when determining a state’s population, increasing the population for states in the south and giving them more representatives in the House of Representatives then they would’ve without the counting of slaves. The southern states gained more representatives as a result of the increase in population, giving them more power in the House of Representatives. According to History Alive, pg.153, “Delegates from the North challenged this idea. Were slaves to be considered people with a right to be represented in Congress?

    Read More

More about The Three-Fifths Compromise

Open Document