It raises the question of ‘What causes war?’ In Ehrenreich’s writing “The Ecstasy of War” she answers that war is too complex to say it is based on a single act. Moreover, she claims that instinct is a minor factor and should be disregarded (Ehrenreich 426-431). Although her principles, some may think instinct should be considered as factor that derives war. Therefore this paper will rebut on the oversimplification of such argument and reason the importance of instinct in war. War has many sides, and our view towards war can change according to the face we look at.
This suggest that “the evilness of men, or their improper behaviour, leads to war” (Waltz, 2001, p.39). Waltz’s second image that he proposes is that the inner administration of the state component is essential for us to understand its tendency towards war. The image has two beliefs that state that for survival in central conflict or civil war, a state must endorse an entity that is homogenously unified. The third image that Waltz highlights the anarchy that exists in the international system. He proposes that as states have such interests that will all too often clash with the interest of other states, e.g.
As every country's alliances became concerned then those alliance's alliances became concerned, the war grew to comprehend the complete world.Imperialism is that the gathering of colonies and within the Nineties, several countries that had not had several colonies set that they needed to possess additional colonies. This junction rectifier to a world competition for land. Imperialism may be seen as a number one explanation for WWI as a result of it created tension and competition between nations, helped the Balkan crisis, and really created WWI a “world” war. In Europe competition between nations was intense and plenty of nations seeked to be the most effective and strongest. Imperialism was quite competitive between nations and caused accrued tension in Europe.
The political violence may start from political parties outside power, which join forces, to form a strong opposition against the ruling party and demand its political rights, such as power sharing or acquisition. The government aims to resist these political groups with systematic political violence against them such as dissolving and banning these parties, or threaten their members, imprison them or kill them. Concepts of "political violence" and "political conflict" stems from the theoretical interferences between the concepts of "power, violence, conflict". Violence is a complex concept of multiple images, dimensions and levels. It has social, political and economic connotations.
Threat’ in the 21st century. Minority ethnic/religious communities who are perceived to be associated with the violence are characterised as communities that might be harbouring extremists and threatening individuals. Numerous studies have shown mass media to articulate dominant social values, ideologies and developments, and that these characteristics often lead to misrepresentation or stereotypical portrayals of minorities in the media (Hall, 1990). The use of the media to incite a fear based control of a population, also used a mechanism to manufacture consent, through normalization, socialization and popularization. The media has also played a part in fuelling this anti-Islamic feeling.
The power the government has, the power the rich has, the potential power the people has individual or as a whole all have conflict against each other instead of coming together. We have the potential to come together and use that power to make a change. However, at the same time the potential power we have over one another can be a bad thing. For example would be people that come together to pro-test and have riots; however, it turns deadly by using violence as a way try to make their voices known. Another example would be those in power using violence against citizens to achieve what they want and
It is an antithetical phenomenon whose means, more often than not contradicts and therefore negates its end. When directed to the state, it often takes the posture of anarchro-nihilism. It is employed by disgruntled sub- national movements or clandestine, criminal groups as a means of furthering nefarious agenda. In this light, the Boko Haram (inappropriately interpreted by transliteration as Western Education is sinful), insurgency has been referred “as the violent assertion of a fringe sectarian identity based on the dogma of a subgroup of a larger national confessional group” (Nchi, 2013:200). In this regard, the “larger national group” refers to the wider Islamic community of Nigeria.
It occurs as a war between the nations, discussion between lovers, divorce cases between couples, madness between friends, negotiations between companies working together, political acts against terror, resignation against managers. People face conflict so often that it is an undeniable part of their lives. 1.2 Causes of Conflict There are many factors in different areas of life that cause conflicts. The causes are to be well analyzed in order to resolve the conflicts. There are 3 major claims that compile the causes.
The ARIS Primer on the Science of Resistance (CH 1) identifies the importance of redefining “resistance” due to the evolving nature of war’s evolution, tactics and outcomes. War • Civil wars have replaced interstate wars • Irregular warfare has overcome traditional warfare methods o Irregular warfare: “violent struggle among non-state actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant population” (ARIS, Pg. 14, Para. 3, Lines 3-5) • Irregular warfare was a secondary concern for the military industrial complex Resistance • Resistance is when people oppose government or authoritative control • Begins in the human heart and manifests through protests, demonstrations, strikes clandestine organizations, underground newspapers, sabotage, subversion,
Terrorism has been the bane of human society. People following different religious, social and ethnic ideologies tend to enforce their view points on others. This intolerance in society gives birth to various segments of likeminded people who try to change the social norms with the use of force and coercion according to their wishes and beliefs. Terrorism has evolved through various stages referred to as Waves of Terrorism. The terrorists have not only improved their tactics but also their reach and impact.