This chapter is a difficult and sad one. We have two cases of two teenagers dead in different circumstances, and two parents reacting differently to the same tragedy. Losing a child must be something unimaginable; something that causes you deep pain. It is difficult to understand the pain and suffering that person is feeling, without having gone through a similar situation. I cannot say who suffered more from both parents, because the suffering cannot be measured, but I wonder, which of the two parents handled better the suffering caused by the death of their daughter. For me the pain and suffering that caused the death of his daughter is the Goliath in this story; it is what both need to overcome in order to continue with their lives. Mike …show more content…
But the mind of a criminal is difficult to understand, it is difficult to predict how they will act. He didn’t think about what could happen if the criminals didn’t think the same way as he. Reynolds misused some of Gladwell's strategies to defeat his Goliath. He don’t use the theory of inverted U wisely, he do not anticipate that in the inverted U Curve, what works in the beginning after a certain point stops working. With the Principle of Legitimacy, he was also wrong; the Three Strikes Law was not fair to all criminals; you could have two criminals in the same cell, one to life imprisonment for theft, and the other a minor sentence despite being a murderer. He doesn’t take into consideration that in order the principle work, they have to see you in a legitimate way. For the relatives of the prisoners, this law was not fair because it judged all the criminals in the same way, regardless of the type of crime committed; therefore they did not see the government as just and legitimate. If you do not comply with the three rules of this principle you can create a collateral damage and decrease the benefits. In the long run, the inappropriate use of power will turn against
In the spring of 1994, California’s Three Strikes was signed into law. It passed with the support of 72 percent of the state’s voters. (Gladwell 236) This law became highly controversial, and on November 6, 2012, voters passed Proposition 36, which amended the law with two primary provisions. Through the controversy, we must take a minute to remember how this law came to be. Mike Reynolds lost his daughter in June of 1992 to murder.
I believe you started this unit with this documentary because one of the last stories in D and G book was about the Three Strike Law, it didn’t have men on death row, but some were convicted to 25 years to life. Death Row: Inside Indiana State Prison, a documentary about a few men who are awaiting their death date or hoping to get off the row and back into normal prison population. After watching, a few question came to mind. My first thought was, what is the process of receiving a death date and how is it chosen? And why are these men kept on death row for many, many years before their death?
California’s Three Strikes Law was implemented in order to improve public safety. The murders of Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds caused the citizens of California to request a reactive measure in order to improve California’s preventive safety measures. Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds were both murdered by repeat offenders. The murders resulted in a public outcry and a petition was started in order to improve the sentencing requirements for repeat offenders (Skelton, 1993). The Three Strikes Law became a source of controversy due to the fact that many people argued that the law was in violation of the Eighth Amendment, which states that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments
Under the law of three strikes, which was implemented in some states of United States, a convict was awarded minimum 25 years to life if he was three time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions. California was the first state to implements this law where several high profile murders committed by felons. Residents were worried that these serial criminal would be released from the prison only to commit new, often serious and violent
The author claims that the argument against capital punishment based on the possibility of executing an innocent person is intellectually and morally shallow. He also claims that abolitionists who use this argument are intellectually dishonest because they accept other social policies that lead to the death of innocent individuals. Prager claims that murderers who are not executed have already murdered innocent people, and the possibility of escape from prison means that they threaten even more innocent lives. Additionally, he claims that abolishing capital punishment does not necessarily protect innocent lives because murderers who are not executed may continue to kill. Finally, the author argues that abolitionists should acknowledge their responsibility for innocent lives lost due to murderers who were not executed and state their genuine belief that murderers should never be
According to our textbook, the three-strike policy is defined as “when people commit a third felony (a third “strike”), they are sentenced to life in prison” (280). The three-strike policy is only one example of how the legislators have tried to pass several laws which is basically meant to send more individuals to prison for longer sentences. The three-strike policy was passed and was put into effect. Many individuals believe that the three-strike policy is unethical and just plain cruel, while other individuals believe that the three-strike policy is a wonderful idea and that it would work out great.
Joe is a 13 year old boy, and the amount of pain he has gone through witnessing the aftermath of his mothers attack. Joe's father also suffered greatly with this attack, changing Joe's mother forever. “Nobody else, not Clemence, not even my mother herself, cared as much as we did about my mother” (109-110), “My father did not move, did not take her hand or comfort her now in any way. He seemed frozen.”(158). The emotional toll of such an attack like this one can harm one's family immensely.
The amount of suffering both of the families in these stories endudured could not be blamed entirely on the authorities in these stories. All of the characters in these stories had a mind of their own, a conscious of their own , they were able to make rational decision between right and wrong. Therefore, the most damage the characters in both stories endured was a product of their own weakness and inabilities to take a stand against authority. They made the ultimate choice to surrender and therefore causing great pain to each other . In conclusion, after many attempts to make it through their new journey the honest way they could, both families realize that good intentionally are useless in such a world that feast on the destruction of
This book is a major example of how certain decisions can affect one’s life. Both Wes’ had similar lives, yet they ended up in different paths. There are few factors why they ended up having different paths and those factors are; parental support and figures, the environment style, and the social influences. In The Other Wes Moore, family ties are very strong and both families of the two boys had certain expectations for them, but one family more than the other.
To illustrate, when an adult becomes a parent, he or she makes a promise to always put their child before themselves. When a parent fails to maintain this promise, every aspect of his or her life revolves around the feeling of guilt. In Maus, the author displays this cause and effect through the use Vladek’s figure-the positioning of the face, hands, and feet to express what a character is feeling. Vladek tells Artie of Moreover, just as a parent can feel the guilt of failure and its restraints, a child can mimic such guilt in just as many ways.
As children at young age are very impressionable, an early childhood experiences can influence a child that can affect them ass an adult. During Nilsen’s childhood, his parent’s divorced when he was at a young age where he went to live with his mother and siblings at his maternal grandfather’s home (Crime Investigation, 2014). As they lived the home, Nilsen became very attached to his grandfather; however, Nilsen’s grandfather had passed away when he was 6 years old which impacted Nilsen when viewing his corpse at the funeral (Crime Investigation, 2014). Along with losing his grandfather, Nilsen became isolated when his mother remarried and had four more children from that marriage (Crime Investigation, 2014).
Best of the Worst Parenting is never perfect. Every parents questions whether they are raising their child correctly, and no parent ever feels like they are doing the right thing. With no clear distinction between good and bad parenting, it is usually left to personal preferences and judgements to decide which parents have adequately raised their children and which have failed. When a parent so call “fails,” often it is the children with their strong will and determination to survive that collectively raise themselves. In Jesmyn Ward’s Sing, Unburied, Sing, Leonie, one of the narrators and the mother of another narrator, Jojo, is not the most caring, hands-on mother, but is loving of her children nevertheless.
The experiences people go through impact the way the see world and those around them. Children are raised by their parents and witnesses to the triumphs and failures. When the age comes many often question their parent’s decisions. Some may feel bitterness and contempt while others may feel admiration and motivation. The “Sign in My Father’s Hands” by Martin Espada conveys the feeling of being treated as a criminal for doing the right thing.
There is no comparison to the amount of pain a parent endures when they outlive their child. A tale of woe is what resides after such incident. An endless cycle of grief is exemplified in the short story “Night” by Bret Lott. The way the father in the story pays meticulous attention to detail makes the audience believe that he does not want to forget the existence of his child. He is merely in denial.
If the child were rescued from its cell-like closet, the whole of the city of Omelas would falter. The city’s great happiness, its splendors and health, its architecture, music, and science, all are dependent on the misery of this one child. The Omelas people know that if the child were released, then the possible happiness of the degraded child, would be set against the sure failure of the happiness of the many. The people have been taught compassion and the terrible reality of justice, and on this they base their lives. ________Readers must face the question of what they would be willing to sacrifice for happiness.