ipl-logo

The Three Strikes Law

329 Words2 Pages

In the United States, habitual offender laws, are statutes enacted by state governments which mandates the courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses. What this means is that people that have been put in prison 3 times will get a harsher punishment going from whatever they 're consequence is to life in prison. I am against this law, for reasons I will talk about later. The origin of the three strikes law came from article 2 section 28 of the Montana constitution in 1998, which states the three strikes law. At first Montana just picked up the law to see if that would help the crime rate in local neighborhoods. The crime rate went down by

Show More
Related

  • California's Three Strikes Law Analysis

    385 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the spring of 1994, California’s Three Strikes was signed into law. It passed with the support of 72 percent of the state’s voters. (Gladwell 236) This law became highly controversial, and on November 6, 2012, voters passed Proposition 36, which amended the law with two primary provisions. Through the controversy, we must take a minute to remember how this law came to be. Mike Reynolds lost his daughter in June of 1992 to murder.

    Read More

  • Model Rule Sentencing Case Study

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ashley Smith CRJU 1400 LU 7 Review Questions Review Questions for Learning Unit Seven What governs the ethical conduct of lawyers? Discuss the pros and cons of plea bargaining. What has the U.S. Supreme Court held in regards to the professional misconduct of prosecutors? (in terms of punishment) How do forfeiture laws help to deter the conduct of mob lawyers?

    Read More

  • The Inverted U-Curve And The Three Strike Law

    664 Words  | 3 Pages

    In other words, if you commit a crime the second time, you serve double and if you commit the 3rd time, you get sentenced minimum 25 yrs. in jail, no matter what crime it is. This was a new law implemented after a man who was recently paroled. He had many criminal records such as drug possession and gun abuse. At the time of release, he was on influence and was a drug addict.

    Read More

  • Death Row: Inside Indiana State Prison: The Three Strike Law

    380 Words  | 2 Pages

    I believe you started this unit with this documentary because one of the last stories in D and G book was about the Three Strike Law, it didn’t have men on death row, but some were convicted to 25 years to life. Death Row: Inside Indiana State Prison, a documentary about a few men who are awaiting their death date or hoping to get off the row and back into normal prison population. After watching, a few question came to mind. My first thought was, what is the process of receiving a death date and how is it chosen? And why are these men kept on death row for many, many years before their death?

    Read More

  • Eddie Griffin's Hope For Strikes

    193 Words  | 1 Pages

    Eddie Griffin was released under Proposition 36. For instance, from a young Griffin has been introduced to alcohol and drugs and was dependent on it since drugs and alcohol can become very addicting and he was later,convicted because of possession of crack cocaine. After 13 years in prison he reformed himself went to rehab and became a model inmate. He now lives a clean life and supports other three strikes in a peer support group called “Hope for Strikes”. Charles Ramirez was arrested under the three strike law for stealing a car radio and was sentenced to life.

    Read More

  • California Three Strikes Analysis

    78 Words  | 1 Pages

    Under the law of three strikes, which was implemented in some states of United States, a convict was awarded minimum 25 years to life if he was three time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions. California was the first state to implements this law where several high profile murders committed by felons. Residents were worried that these serial criminal would be released from the prison only to commit new, often serious and violent

    Read More

  • Sentencing Reform Research Paper

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    The role of the government is to keep everyone and everything in line. The government should have a sentencing reform because with the system we have now it 's just making things worse. Some people are being placed in jail because of their color when there are real criminals that are set free when they really did do something wrong like murdering someone. The government should have a sentencing reform because the system now is just making things worse. To begin with, The government should have a sentencing reform because the system now is just making things worse.

    Read More

  • Three Strikes Law

    673 Words  | 3 Pages

    The three strikes law refers to a “category of statutes” that substantially increases the length of imprisonment for anyone found guilty of three or more felony offenses (Legal). A strike is incurred each time an individual is convicted of a serious, or violent felony. The felonies that are included within this category are: “burglary, robbery, kidnapping, murder, rape, child molestation involving the use of a weapon, any offense that results in severe bodily injury, arson, and crimes that involve explosive materials.” (Randolph). Baumes law, was the precursor to the three strikes law that are in place today.

    Read More

  • Sentencing Reform: What´s Sentencing Reform?

    413 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people have their own opinion about sentencing reform. Some people think that it should be change while others think that it should stay how it is. In my opinion i think that they should not change it. To start with, i think that the sentencing reform should stay the same because there 's too many crimes going on in this world. According to source 1 it states, “there is no question that crime rates will increase if sentencing reform provides large numbers of criminals with early release from prison and requires shorter sentences when they re-offend.”

    Read More

  • Essay On Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

    1798 Words  | 8 Pages

    Introduction Crime, its punishment, and the legislation that decides the way in which they interact has long been a public policy concern that reaches everyone within a given society. It is the function of the judicial system to distribute punishment equitably and following the law. The four traditional goals of punishment, as defined by Connecticut General Assembly (2001), are: “deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation.” However, how legislature achieves and balances these goals has changed due to the implementation of responses to changing societal influences. Mandatory minimum sentences exemplify this shift.

    Read More

  • Essay On Felony Offender Status

    958 Words  | 4 Pages

    The theory is that if someone has already been convicted of multiple violent felonies, they are unlikely to change their behavior and may continue to be a danger to society if released from prison. By imposing longer sentences on these individuals, the hope is that they will be kept off the streets and unable to commit further crimes. However, some argue that persistent violent felony offender status is too harsh and does not take into account individual circumstances. For example, someone may have committed multiple violent felonies early in life and then turned their life around, but under this law, they could still face a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years to life for any future violent felony convictions. Additionally, critics argue that this enhancement disproportionately affects people of color, who are more likely to be convicted of violent crimes and receive longer sentences than white individuals.

    Read More

  • Mandatory Sentencing Laws Essay

    1509 Words  | 7 Pages

    With the economy in the turmoil that it is in America cannot continue to support these sentencing guidelines. The Mandatory Article Sentencing declares that the laws are becoming a huge drain on the Justice Bureau’s budget, and in 2012 the United States had far beyond more people incarcerated than any other country. Most of these prisoners are low-level drug offenders sentenced under mandatory sentencing guidelines with a cost draining on American taxpayers $6.8 billion a year, as of 2012. These costs do not seem to have a ceiling and continue eating up about twenty-five percent of the federal justice system’s yearly budget.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Three Strikes Law

    312 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Three Strikes law is a way to ensure justice and to stop criminals from committing more crimes. According to Adam Gelb, director of the Pew Center's Public Safety

    Read More

  • Disadvantages Of Rehabilitation State Prison

    1678 Words  | 7 Pages

    However, crimes are committed whilst in prison, such as drugs and assaults. Some critics say the ‘three strikes and you are out’ law where repeat offenders get a longer sentence are wrong, as the third strike could be a lesser crime such as public disorder. Nevertheless, if just incapacitation and no rehabilitation some critics say will be costlier to society as they will go out and reoffend and, they are not employed and pay taxes. Rehabilitation is also a punishment which should improve the offender's behaviour and stop them committing crimes. Advocates of rehabilitation state prison does not work; however, critics of rehabilitation state prison does work as the criminal cannot commit a crime against the public while incarcerated (Cavadino, 2007 p 36/56).

    Read More

  • Just Deserts Theory

    1782 Words  | 8 Pages

    Through the decades, crime and crime control have been analyzed in an attempt to find the causes of crime and decide how to combat them. The United States showed an increase in their prison population in the 1970s when the country turned towards a more punitive justice system. Referred to as just deserts theory of crime, the aim is to inflict as much pain on the offender through harsh prison sentences, in hopes to cause as much pain as the crime they committed. The worse the crime is, the worse the punishment the criminal will endure. The issue surrounding just deserts theory is the vast amount of offenders who return to prison after being released, also known as the recidivism rate.

    Read More

More about The Three Strikes Law

Open Document