Breed selection legislation (BSL) is the regulation or banning of specific breeds of dogs in attempt to reduce canine attacks, and has become one of the biggest matters of disagreement regarding animal ownership. In Flanagin’s article “The Tragedy of America’s Dog: A brief history of the vilification of the pit bull,” the author successfully argues that the pit bull, one of the main breeds discriminated against by BSL, is unrightfully blamed for an uninformed and irresponsible people. Flanagin attempts to reach the reader by using the breed’s shifting reputation, as well as the misleading facts, to show how society has been deceived into believing that the dog is to blame.
Flanagin writes for the Pacific Standard, a magazine that focuses on
…show more content…
In the next section of the article, he seeks to reinforce his case by claiming that the outlawing of pit bulls is not a fair solution, for it wrongfully pins blame on the dogs and avoids the true root of the issue. Instead, he clearly claims that it is people and their lack of responsibility to be blamed for the modern day pit bull reputation. He presents the fact that pit bulls are especially popular in low income areas, leading to “a large number of un-spayed and un-neutered pit bulls living in an extremely close proximity to one another” (Flanagin). This cycle has led to pit bulls making up the majority of unclaimed dogs, composing “90 percent of the homeless dog population” (Flanagin). He continues to support this claim redirecting the thought that pit bulls are aggressive to statistics showing that it is un-neutered and unclaimed pit bulls that are responsible for most of the dog bites. He quotes the American Humane Association as he provides the statistic that “94 percent reported pit bull attacks involve an un-neutered male canine” and sensibly claims that it is the “high testosterone levels in mammals that produce heightened aggression” (Flanagin). Flanagin, alongside The Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and the CDC, argues that the answer does not lie in banning, but instead in “[regulating] individual dogs and owners on the basis of behavior” by spaying and neutering these breeds (Flanagin). By refuting the idea that BSL is an effective solution, and then providing an alternative approach, Flanagin proposes a logical and convincing argument that any reader should be willing to
Having a pit bull as a pet is like having any other pet, most pit bulls are warm, cuddly and very enthusiastic. They tend to provide security, comfort, and studies have shown that pit bulls have an extreme and extensive psychological and therapeutic effects on humans of every age. Yet in over 1,000 US cities and more than a dozen of counties within 36 states it is illegal to own this specific breed and they have a “breed-specific legislation”. Pit bulls were not born vicious or aggressive; they are raised to behave this way by irresponsible people. Although others state that studies have proven that pit bulls carry this aggression in their DNA.
The media has led many to believe that pit bulls are a dangerous breed that can unravel at any time, attacking anything that crosses their path. However, like most other dogs, pit bulls were genetically bred for a specific purpose and are products of their environment. The history of this breed is a long and extensive account of what was once a beloved canine, too what is now a vilified breed. Even though they are labeled “Pit bulls” they are in fact not a specific breed of dog. Being a mixture of Bull terriers, the American Staffordshire terrier, and the Staffordshire terrier, Pit bulls were bred to be working dogs and family companions prior to being bred to bull bait (restraining a bull with a rope tied to an ironed stake that gave him only a few feet to move.
In both Jonathan Foer's My Life as a Dog and Dave Barry's Guys vs. Men, the authors write about a specific group and present their characteristics, but in very different ways. In the beginning of My Life as a Dog, Foer describes what it is like to be a dog living in New York, but the main idea seems to be the relation between humans and animals and how they, "make us feel, in the best sense of the word, human"(248). Foer explains that human relations with animals, specifically dogs, seems to be better when we are children, and when we become adults we tend to be more cruel to animals. Foer's exact words are: It is children, very often, who want dogs.
To build his credibility the author uses evidence such as; “The French, who love their dogs, sometimes eat their horses. The Spanish, who love their horses, sometimes eat their cows. The Indians, who love their cows, sometimes eat their dogs” (Foer, par 3). This piece of evidence starts by showing the authors credibility because it proves that he has studied other cultures and their everyday lives as well as their own animal taboos. Another piece of evidence that presents the author with credibility is when he mentions, “Perhaps we could include dogs under the Human Methods of Slaughter Act” (Foer, Par. 12).
It also was great support to his argument. Manjoo explains that both dogs and his son don’t act in a socially acceptable way. He loves his son and despises dogs and touches on how people get more annoyed with the parent of a misbehaving child than the owner of a misbehaving dog. His point in this comparison is to prove that he makes an effort not to disturb those around him while proving himself not impartial.
Across the nation animal shelters are flooded with unwanted or homeless dogs, 74% of them being pitbulls. It is strongly believed, by some, that animals are not born mean they are made mean. Many people like to jump to the conclusion that Pitbulls and similar dogs, are naturally mean, but in reality they make the best family pets if treated
Due to media's false information about the pitbulls, many shelters put them down before giving anyone the chance to adopt them (BestFriends). Many people are forces people to give their beloved pets. Since 2017, 20 states have passed a contract against breed discrimination and has been working on increase the number but still people don't know that they can admit that the breed is the most kind, lovable breed to get to know. The pitbull is the most misunderstood when it comes to the media but pitbulls are like dragons but can be trained to be good. Pit bulls have been the target of breed specific legislation for years despite evidence claiming such laws do not diminish the number of overall dog attacks.
Pitbulls are being wronged every day because of the inaccurate perception that they are aggressive and violent. However, most pit bulls are not naturally born that way, it is because of the environment they live in and who they are owned by. Training pit bulls for illegal fighting, bull-baiting, and the teaching of aggression, are all inciting behaviors of humans. These examples lead to the out lash of their dangerous actions, leading to many deaths of humans and animals. The neglect and abuse they receive do not make their stereotype of a “killer dog” any better than it already is.
Argumentative Essay by: Elizabeth Mayer Pit Bulls Should Be Pets Think of a dog, with a strong jaw, sleek short fur, and a little tail. This dog is called a Pitbull and some people say this dog is bad or vicious because it is called a Pitbull, however I believe that pit bulls should be pets because they can be very sweet, they have a bad rep because of the media, and they can be a great addition to the family. First, there are many pros to having a Pitbull other than the fact that if they grow up in the correct environment, they can be the sweetest dogs ever. There is also the fact that some are heroes, in paragraph 3, source three the text states “in the early 1900s, the pit bull was one of the most popular breeds In America.
The counterargument of this is that pitbulls are not aggressive just from dog fighting it is also the way the owners raise the dog breed, you could personally raise another dog breed besides a pitbull and they could lash out as well and be into dog fighting also, why should we blame the pitbulls. A pro stated from pro con says that pitbulls have the automatic nature to be aggressive and bite people. This is not true at all; there are very nice pitbulls out there who are not aggressive or bite at all. The counterargument to this statement is that, Pitbulls are not aggressive or dangerous they are just like and other dog breed if they are raised incorrectly or get raised into dog fighting they will be aggressive, but if you raise them properly and don't dog fight they are the most gentle breed of dogs out there. Some questions you may be asking could be, Should places have this pitbull restriction?
Noel, a 6-month old golden retriever, arrives on the front porch step of SICSA with a gleefully wagging tail and a heart bursting with love. Unfortunately, no room exists at SICSA for Noel, and they must turn her away to a shelter that can only do one thing: euthanize her. The argument over whether or not communities should institute no-kill shelters presents itself all over Ohio. Multiple people in Ohio believe that no-kill shelters cause financial stress on the community and prove to be a substantial hassle. However, in reality, no-kill shelters lower the overall costs of animal control with multiple methods.
The proposition of pit bull bans continues to create passionate debates. Repeatedly, this issue of bans has been brought to the public’s attention through news outlets continuing to question the relevancy of such bans. Should we have breed-specific bans? Are pit bulls truly as bad as many portray them to be?
Thus proving, how this could, and should, have been avoided all along; justifying how Robinson's video of animal cruelty should be a
More than likely the people that get this type of dog would just train a different breed of dog such as german shepherds to do the same thing therefore, “banning pit bulls would make no progress”. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/should-pit-bulls-be-banned. “If it was determined that pit bulls were 5 times more likely to attack than any other dogs, that could mean that 5 out of 1 million pit bulls will attack in their lifetime instead of 1 out of 1 million. The point is the evidence that shows pit bulls are more likely to attack than other dogs is misinterpreted to mean that they are likely to attack”. http://www.opposingviews.com/i/should-pit-bulls-be-banned.
The preceding paragraphs explored evidence to demonstrate it from three different aspects: eating dog meat is something normal in China, it is beneficial to people’s bodies and that eating dog meat doesn’t infringe upon the legitimate rights of others. But it’s a distinct condition of stealing and eating dogs which belong to others, and one will be chargeable with theft if they do this.. As a saying goes “Nothing can be accomplished without norms or standards.” Government must increase the intensity of punishment for stealing and eating domesticated dogs to protect the rights of the dogs’