The Transformational Leadership Style: Sir Li Ka-Shing

One of the leadership styles that Sir Li Ka-Shing has is the transformational leadership style. Transformational leadership style is a style which after the leadership trait theory, leadership behavior theory and leadership contingency theory that has been refer by a American political sociologist whose name James Mac Gregor Burns in his 1978 book” Leadership”. He defined transformational leadership as a process where "leaders and their followers raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation." Transformational leadership style is able to inspire followers to change expectations, perceptions and motivations to work towards common goals through the strength of their vision and personality. Transformational leader helps bring

The concept of transformational leadership has been developed further by Bernard M. Bass in his 1985 book, "Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations," In his book, he mentioned about the transformational leader is the kind of leader who is a model of integrity and fairness, who can set clear goals, who has high expectation, who always encourage others, who provide support and recognition, who stirs the emotion of people, who gets people to look beyond their self-interest and who inspires people to reach for the improbable. In the business leadership, transformational leadership is often to be the most important ideas even though the book of Bass has been more than 25 years. The full range of leadership introduces four elements of transformational leadership, which are individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation and idealized influence. Individualized consideration is the element that the transformational leader attends to each follower 's needs, acts as a mentor or coach to the follower and listens to the follower 's concerns and needs. The leader gives empathy and support, keeps communication open and places challenges before the

Autocratic leadership can be also known as authoritarian leadership. Autocratic derives from the words auto (Greek for self) and cratic, which implies rule. A person autocratic leadership sometimes, but not always, provides clear expectations for what needs to be done, when it should be done, and how it should be done. It is a leadership which the leader has total authority and control over decision making. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. They not only control the efforts of the team, but monitor them for completion –often under close scrutiny. Plenty of leaders stand out as having autocratic leadership characteristics such as Lorne Michaels, Roger Ailes, Helen Gurley Brown, John Chambers, Ridley Scott and Tony La Russa. All these executives, publishers, producers, directors and coaches display authoritarian traits that contribute to their success. There are some advantages of autocratic leadership, such as a quick decision can be done. It is effective in work environments where decisions need to be made quickly. The sole responsibility rests with the leader, he/she can make decision without consulting with a large group of people. Autocratic leadership also can work well for managers who prefer having complete control over an operation. The manager can