The Trolley Problem: What Does Bystander Meaning
In this assignment I would like to explore the Trolley Problem, more specifically the variant which is called Bystander at the Switch. First I would propose my opinion on what should be done and why. Then I would propose a counter-argument which may be invoked in response to my reasoning, of which I would attempt to resolve. Bystander at the Switch is as follows: “A bystander happens to be standing by the track, next to a switch that can be used to turn the tram off the straight track, on which five [...people] are working, onto a spur of track to the right on which only one [...person] is working. The bystander therefore has only two options: [...] (i) do nothing, letting five die, or (ii) throw the switch to the right, killing one” (Thomson 2008, p. 361). I, along with a majority of people would agree, without hesitation, that in this case it is okay to pull the lever and take one life instead of five, some would even say that we should pull the lever, implying that we are morally obligated to do so. Justification for this decision is as follows: “When you have the means to save life, it’s better to save more”, which is a common consequentialist reasoning in this situation. I believe that given the chance to do so, we are morally obligated to save as much life as possible, after all, isn’t all life sacred? But it is important to note that on pulling …show more content…
But we must also note that Thomson is justifying to not save someone given the means to do so, which is also a horrifying idea to a lot of
Connors V. Doctorman Case Summary
682 Words | 3 PagesHow can the state actually preserve and protect all human life if one life is nearly at ends. Mr.Connors was going to die
An Explanation Of Charging Samantha
603 Words | 3 PagesThe number of people negatively affected by his choice is greater than the number of people who would benefit. Only Officer Jankowski and the potential other drivers Samantha may
Physician Assisted Suicide Summary
1953 Words | 8 PagesGill argues that keeping a person healthy cannot be a physician’s only moral duty because in cases of terminal ill patients, they can no longer be treated or healed (372). If a physician’s only duty were to heal patients then they would not tend to the terminally ill because there would be nothing else that they could do, which is something that most people would find to be morally wrong (Gill, 373). No one would be okay with a doctor not helping a person at all who has received a terminal sentence. So instead of promoting health in this case, the physicians must find a way to reduce the suffering of the patient. This means that the physician should be able to reduce the suffering in the way that the patient asks for.
Bystander Behavior And Discourse Analysis
834 Words | 4 PagesBystander behaviour can generally be described as the actions people take when they witness an emergency situation in a public place. There have been many studies on bystander behaviour, this essay will explore two approaches to explain this behaviour. It will look at the experimental method performed by Latané and Darley and at the discourse analysis done by Levine. First the essay will describe and outline the methods.after that it will examine the similarities as well as the contrast between those techniques. Latané and Darley did their research on bystander behaviour in the aftermath of the murder case of Catherine `Kitty´ Genovese,which happened in the Suburbs of New York in 1964.
Analysis: Would Mill Run Over Five Adults Or A Childhood
369 Words | 2 PagesThe main argument would be deciding if the trolley would run over five adults or one child. If there was a chance to save all six people, then that would definitely be the best option, but this is not the case. The philosophy of Mill would propose a way to handle this. He described his method as a hierarchy of pleasures, which is determined by qualitative distinctions. The higher pleasures would be more focused on the mind instead of the body.
Trolley Problem: Using Utilitarianism Theory
296 Words | 2 PagesIn the trolley problem it is apparent, especially using the utilitarianism theory that it is morally right to save the five people on the tracks and kill one person, whether it is the fat person or the man on the track. If I were in the person responsible for saving the five other people I would most likely just change the tracks because if I pushed the fat man off the bridge to stop the train I would be killing a man, who was innocent, with no connection to the train workers. The man on the tracks applied for the job and knew the risks when going into the field. I still would not want to kill either one but if I had to make a choice I would choose to change the tracks. I don’t answer consistently because it is hard to choose which option is
Comparison Of Philippa Foot Rescue I And Rescue
1831 Words | 8 PagesThesis The Philippa Foot Rescue I and Rescue II presents. a moral dilemma in which a person must decide between saving the lives of many and letting one die or letting many die in order to save one. In this essay, I will introduce two philosophers, John Stuart Mill, and Immanuel Kant, who will then have their philosophies analyzed and applied to the situation in a way that simulates a potential approach to the two scenarios. In addition to that, I will provide a criticism of both approaches and why I believe that Mill’s approach to the scenario would be a superior choice when compared to Kant’s.
Explain Why People Should Be Held Accountable In Life
777 Words | 4 PagesAs a result... some people have over thought this idea they still would want to do this, but it is still there choice on this if they do or do not want to do this. In fact... many people have died from these situations or couldn 't get saved by the people trying to rescue them. For example...if you go mountain climbing
A Moral Paradox: The Trolley Problem
1520 Words | 7 PagesThe scenario is; a man decides to take a walk along trolley tracks that crisscross his town. As he walks, he hears a trolley behind him so he steps away from the tracks, but as the trolley gets closer, he hears sounds of panic- five people are shouting for help. The brakes of the trolley are not functioning and it is gathering speed. Between this man and the track, there is a fat man within arm’s reach; he is large enough to stop the runaway trolley. This man can save the five passengers by pushing the fat man onto the tracks, stopping the runaway trolley, but the fat man will die if he is used to stop the trolley.
John Stuart Mill: The Train To The Right Killing One Person
417 Words | 2 PagesI think I will divert the train to the right killing one person because one person is less important than five. Sometimes it is important to do what is right than what is morally good to do. The utilitarianism is a moral theory that gives happiness to the number of people in the society and it has been considered greatness, an action is morally appropriate if its outcomes lead to happiness and wrong if it results in sadness. I will begin by describing what Mill might do in the Trolley situation. Next, I will contrast what Kant might do in this situation and lastly, I will be also going to give my opinion on this Trolley situation.
Analysis Of Roxane Gay 'The Illusion Of Safety: The Safety Of Illusion'
887 Words | 4 PagesIn Roxane Gay’s essay “The Illusion of Safety/The Safety of Illusion”, the argument being made here is in part the usefulness of trigger warnings, as well as the idea that everyone has a situation that is unique to them and that we need to avoid putting everyone in the same box. Because Gay’s main argument is on the usefulness of trigger warnings, it’s imperative that she convince readers that she knows what she’s talking about. Gay proves this effectively by immediately listing her triggers using a unique technique. Every sentence begins using the same word.
Film Analysis: Extreme Measures
783 Words | 4 PagesDoctor Myrick attempts to find pleasure in the heart breaking injury of paralysis through the slight chance he as found of curing it. Because of his chance of curing paralysis, Myrick illegally uses test subjects against their will to test his cell growing process in which eventually kills his subjects because it is not a properly thought out protocol following procedure. Doctor Myrick goes against utilitarianism in this situation because he does not follow the third tenet of Utilitarianism, which is the viewpoint of “a disinterested and benevolent spectator”. He does this when he makes the decision for the test subjects instead of testing the procedure for the goodwill of all the people involved in the situation. In order to make the proper
The Pros And Cons Of The Bystander Effect
1212 Words | 5 PagesThe word “help” is a very complicated yet simple word. According to the Learner’s Dictionary, the definition of help is: to do something that makes it easier for someone to do a job, to deal with a problem, to aid or assist someone. Helping someone sounds like an easy job, and most of us would agree that we would help people anytime anywhere, but it always doesn’t turn out that way. Scientists have spent a considerable amount of time studying the helpfulness behavior of several types of people. Picture this... a man lying on the floor and a few people strolling about, occupied with their business.
Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism
1711 Words | 7 PagesSuppose a conductor is driving his train and the breaks are defect. The rails lead directly into a cluster of five people who would all die if the train will go this direction. However, the conductor can change onto another track where only one person is standing hence only one person would die. How should the conductor react (Hare, 1964)? Is it possible to condense the problem to a rather simple maximization problem in example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people?
The Fat Man And The Trolley Car Dilemma Analysis
1736 Words | 7 PagesThere is a runaway train headed towards five people; by you being on a bridge watching above you are unable to reach the lever next to the train. A large individual is right beside you, but you realize if you were to push him off the bridge and onto the tracks the train will hit and kill him. Since his body is chubby, it will stop the train from touching the five people. There are options; one of them is if you do not push the fat man the train will hit and kill five people. If you push the fat man, the trolley will hit and kill one person saving five.
More about The Trolley Problem: What Does Bystander Meaning
Connors V. Doctorman Case Summary
682 Words | 3 PagesAn Explanation Of Charging Samantha
603 Words | 3 PagesPhysician Assisted Suicide Summary
1953 Words | 8 PagesBystander Behavior And Discourse Analysis
834 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis: Would Mill Run Over Five Adults Or A Childhood
369 Words | 2 PagesTrolley Problem: Using Utilitarianism Theory
296 Words | 2 PagesComparison Of Philippa Foot Rescue I And Rescue
1831 Words | 8 PagesExplain Why People Should Be Held Accountable In Life
777 Words | 4 PagesA Moral Paradox: The Trolley Problem
1520 Words | 7 PagesJohn Stuart Mill: The Train To The Right Killing One Person
417 Words | 2 PagesAnalysis Of Roxane Gay 'The Illusion Of Safety: The Safety Of Illusion'
887 Words | 4 PagesFilm Analysis: Extreme Measures
783 Words | 4 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Bystander Effect
1212 Words | 5 PagesStrengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism
1711 Words | 7 PagesThe Fat Man And The Trolley Car Dilemma Analysis
1736 Words | 7 Pages