ABSTRACT
The aim of this essay is to investigate the impact of the Tulip Period of the Ottoman Empire, on the architecture of the Nuruosmaniye Mosque in Istanbul. The focus of this Extended Essay is on the architecture and the history of the Nuruosmaniye Mosque. To give a better understanding of the aims of this essay, I have explained what architecture is. I have analyzed the history of the Nuruosmaniye Mosque and I have demonstraeted the impact of the Tulip Period of the Ottoman Empire on this significant landmark.I arranged a trip to İstanbul to see the subject of my essay, the Nuruosmaniye Mosque first hand, therefore I have personally experienced the atmosphere of this historical building. During this trip I have taken
…show more content…
Ahmet III was the Sultan and Damat İbrahim Pasha (From Nevşehir) was the Grand Vizier. This period is known as the beer and skittles period. The Tulip Period takes its name from the tulips which were growing in Istanbul and soon its fame sprawled all around the world. This period falls under the period of regression.
Sultan Ahmet III had a sensitive and a kind soul and because of that he worked with Damat İbrahim Paşa in harmony. During the Tulip Period the art visited the ottomans. Sultan Ahmet III built a lot of libraries and fountains. He encouraged his architects to adopt the Baroque style and implement it on the buildings.
The architecture on the Tulip
…show more content…
This mosque constructed in Tulip Period. In that period Ottomans were constructing a lot of magnificent buildings because according to the Sultans of the era those buildings were showing the power of the Ottoman and because of this reason they were using a lot of motives on their buildings. As I mentioned in my essay the Rococo era and the Baroque style were much exaggerated in terms of motifs and patterns. In the Tulip Period the architects influenced by those styles and they implied those styles on the mosque and in here on
Both dynasties valued the architecture of mosques and palaces in particular. While the Safavids built structures such as Mosques, the Ottomans built structures such as a palace. The Safavids
Their architecture blended features of various places and different sources, including the Byzantine Empire and features they created themselves. These people were not only very smart but also very artistic, creating numerous beautiful buildings and even their writing being something to look at in awe. Speaking of the buildings they created, ‘Arab statisticians..boasted 37 libraries, numberless bookstores, 800 public schools..and a total population of 300,000.’ (Doc 2) In other words, the people of Islam knew what they were doing and loved to build up their empire.
Suleyman made the Ottoman Empire the most powerful empire in history by concurring three different continents and constructing the Golden age of the empire. This magnificent sultan had it all and his amazing legacy is still told today, which is remarkable(Hays 1). Suleyman was born September 6, 1494 in Trabzon, In addition “Suleyman was born two years after Columbus have sailed to America”(Hays 2). Suleyman had a hard
There are many fascinating mosaics on the Tower. Some materials used for the design and structure were iron, metal, pink and grey marble coquina stone, friezes, tiles, carved screens, arched entranceway, balconies, and sculpted finals. Some of the themes consist of philosophy, depiction in, the Bible, Nature and humanity. There was also Renaissance -style iron
The Ottoman Empire came into power in 1301. The Ottomans were able to overthrow the Seljuks and after that they were able to repopulate the city and stay in power until 1922. The Ottoman rulers implemented many systems that were more helpful than harmful and allowed them to have strong loyal citizens. These systems built up their empire in crucial places. The Ottoman Empire had a strong trade and military system with religious tolerance these factors allowed them to stay in power for so long.
All empires in history had a high in their history but they all eventually came to their demise. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty both had ways they gained, consolidated and maintained their power while they were at their highest point. They had significant leaders that lead to these successful points. The Ottoman Empire covered parts of Asia, Europe and Africa controlled by their leader named Suleiman.
The impacts the Muslims made were made possible by the scale that the Islamic world and religion had grown to. In this specific document, from the audience of the author, the elephantine size of the Islamic culture at this time is being expressed. Like the former paragraph, the height of the trading industry was right after the golden age.
While art varies in many ways, one can also easily identify many similarities between cultures. These similarities and differences have been seen and identified throughout history as art has continued to evolve. Architecture is no different, meaning although two grand structures were built on different sides of the world, similarities can be drawn between them. These similarities are consist of symbolism, architecture, and materials used in the structures. For example, the Hagia Sophia and Charlemagne’s Chapel both share similarities and differences through their histories and the architecture and decorations that make these structures so grand.
This evidently portrays the creators’ intentions in creating this magnificent building (for worship), as they were heavily influenced by religion. This architectural structure implemented for worshipping the gods is much like the ziggurats, created by Ancient Mesopotamian cities. Ziggurats are also religious structures in the shape of a pyramid, used to honor the gods. Thus, religious beliefs and ideas greatly influenced the artistic and architectural structures that were
One of the most successful ghazis was Osman, conquering the frontiers of the Byzantine Empire, buying lands for expansion, and forming alliances with emirs. His followers became known as the Ottomans. In 1361, Osman’s son, Orkhan I declared himself a sultan. During his rule, he
Through this essay I will be discussing the comparisons and the contrast between temples in Greek architecture and roman architecture. I will be commenting on the forms, materials, technology and the siting to compare and contrast the architecture of ancient Greece and Ancient Rome. Also I will discuss how these points reflect the structure of the Greek and roman societies from which the temples emerged. Greek Architecture There were three main styles in Greek architecture, these styles were called the Doric style, Ionic style and the Corinthian style.
Their artistic designs of windows, gates and roofs share characteristics with the Italian architecture and their basic structures found in mosques were adopted from the people of Anatolia. The Ottomans collected many different ideas from other countries and made them into one magnificent piece. This is why architecture was such a major aspect of Ottoman culture. The third reason why the Ottoman culture led to a strong empire was because of the Ottoman toleration.
The Pantheon and Brunelleschi 's Dome in Florence both share a common idea of the dome in ancient history. They were built and different times, the Pantheon and Brunelleschi 's Dome differ in both design and architecture. This paper is going to analyze the Pantheon in Rome and Brunelleschi 's Dome in terms of their constructional and design techniques, and their historical circumstances of the construction of them both. The Pantheon is one of the remaining and properly maintained buildings of the first century.
In the architectural realm these nonvisual experiences become important in how our space is perceived, how it makes people feel and even perform. The scale of architecture in relation to the person, the sensation a hand feels while touching a handrail, or the sound a person makes on the building as they walk: all of these
The style of the building and the purpose it is built give a brief and thoughtful storybook about the culture of the architect as art, generally, and architecture, particularly, is a language itself. Thus, buildings narrate the stories of the people among the history and tell their traditions and habits to the next generation through its design, inscriptions, and details. In this essay, I will discuss how both the style and function of the Greek Parthenon and the Roman Pantheon served as typical examples of their cultures in Athens and ancient Rome. In addition to the similarities and differences between these two cultures through the two buildings. Both the Greek and the Roman architecture inspired the cultures and architects until these days due to the diverse meaning they carry and symbolize in astonishing ways through the different orders, columns, roofs, friezes, and domes.