CH2 - Questions/Answers in Dialogue 2. Evaluate the recent documentary video by Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss. It 's available on Netflix and other streaming services. Let me know if you have any difficulty accessing the film. http://unbelieversmovie.com/ Critique two different question/answer exchanges from the debate in terms of the question/answer scenarios in Ch. 2 of the Walton text - and critique how well your two debate choices conformed (or not) to the principles of informal logic The Unbelievers This posting is in regards to the documentary movie The Unbelievers, but more so the questions in dialogue. Through chapter two we find that our book takes a look at the topic of questions in dialogue. In their words we find “Normally in reasonable dialogue one is obliged to try to give a direct answer to a question” going on to say “if one knows the answer, and if the question is reasonable and appropriate” (Walton, 2008). We then read that normal doesn’t necessarily mean the norm. Issues involving many different aspects of question and answer scenarios are illustrated in this chapter. …show more content…
The first person introduced is Dr. Lawrence Krauss, theoretical physicist and author of A Universe from Nothing. The second subject of the film is Dr. Richard Dawkins, evolutionary biologist and author of The God Delusion. The movie then takes the viewer through the travels in which Krauss and Dawkins are seen debating, or discussing the ability to question the topic of religion. Finally, the viewer is given the chance to witness speeches by the two men and others at the Reason Rally on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., touted as the largest rally of its kind at the
This essay is an analysis of Thank You For Arguing by Jay Heinrichs, a full-time advocate for the lost art of rhetoric. The three major topics to cover are which tools he uses frequently, which chapter was the most valuable and crucial to arguing effectively, and the argument for the book’s continued use or refutation of its value. Jay Heinrichs is teaching us the art of persuasion and other tools that come with it. Heinrichs uses many famous people, from Bart Simpson to Aristotle, to send his message and teach about The Art of Persuasion.
If you were to ask someone why is it that they stop at a red light, they’re response would most likely be “I don’t want to break the law and go to jail.” The reality is that we must obey the law not because of the fear of going to jail, but to create order in preventing a harmful outcome. Our government instills fear in our society to follow the law because that is the most effective way to dominate our behavior. “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry G-d”, delivered by Jonathan Edwards, a strict Puritan priest, is remembered as the most famous sermon ever preached on American soil. Today it appears in almost every anthology American Literature and stands alone as the only sermon included.
Often in sermons ministers persuade their audience to behave in a spiritual or moral fashion. Such is the case in “Sinners of an Angry God” by Johnathan Edwards. Where John Edwards speaks upon where God sends sinners to hell who do not repent. Edwards wanted to educate puritans about learning that they will go to hell and its never ending if they do not stop sinning. John Edwards had a remarkable impact on his use of admonishing tone, “swallowed up in everlasting in hope of the Glory God.”
Recently there have been various accounts of shootings occurring on college campuses. The most recent of these occurred at Umpqua Community College in Oregon, where nine people were killed. There has been some controversy over whether or not concealed firearms should be permitted in public classrooms. In the newspaper editorial, “Guns, Campuses, and Madness”, Frank Bruni describes some of the pros and cons of allowing concealed guns on college campuses. He uses a variety of rhetorical devices in order to portray his message, including rhetorical questions and ethos.
After the Prophet by Lesley Hazleton is a narrative history that tells you about the cause of the split in between Muslims. The Sunnis and The Shias. Hazleton does this in three main chapters that circulate around the people that mainly cause the Sunni-Shia ordeal. Prophet Muhammad, Ali, and Hussein. When the Prophet Muhammad dies after an illness, his followers were at loss of an irreplaceable leader.
The “other,” are commonly perceived as anyone belonging to the Muslim faith, or having descended, and or immigrated, from the Middle East region. They regularly face hateful actions and insults. Regardless of what they have contributed to their communities, the post 9/11 world increased, and fortified, anti-immigrant attitudes towards Muslims living in the United States. The prejudice the Muslims face makes it difficult for them to work and live in the United States. In the novel, In The Language of Miracles by Rajia Hassib, the characters are essentially excommunicated by the community they live in, resulting in the loss of clients and friends.
Rick Warren and Sam Harris are undoubtedly leaders in different spheres of thought. Warren, a big-name evangelist and founder of one of the largest churches in the United States, debated Harris, a soft-spoken neuroscientist and key player in the proliferation of New Atheism, under the supervision of Jon Meacham for a Newsweek special. In the conflict of theism versus atheism—God or no God—Warren makes a case for the former, explaining that because of our limited knowledge of the universe and our inherent feeling of spirituality, we must have faith in the traditional Christian God. I agree with Warren in that the human scope of knowledge is extremely limited, but I staunchly disagree that this assumes the existence of God. Not only are Warren’s claims about miracles, atheists and his rationale regarding morality factually unfounded, they are primarily the result of some characteristic psychological fallacies.
Jonathan Edwards once said: “Resolution One: I will live for God. Resolution Two: If no one else does, I still will.” Since birth (October 5th, 1703), Jonathan has always been a devoted Puritan which explains why he began the Great Awakening, along with George Whitefield. Edwards started preaching and wanted people to reconvert to Puritanism. His work, “Sinners at the Angry Hands of God,” was written on July 8, 1741.
For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.
They argue about the belief in God and the evolution of Darwin that Brady calls “Evil-ution”. There are two main logical
The Truth Behind the Rhetoric of Carl Sagan One of the largest debates known to modern man is that between creationists and evolutionists. Is human existence evidence of a divine power? Did humankind reach its current state on the reliance of genetic mistakes? Is it of any concern to know one way or another? In his insightful essay, “Do we care what’s true?
The Great Debaters is an intriguing film set in the 1930s about a professor that goes by the name of Melvin Tolson who teaches students from Wiley College, in Texas, the fundamentals of debating. During this day in age, if an African American didn’t “stay in their place” they would be ridiculed for such insane behavior. One can only imagine how difficult it must have been for them to get through a debate without caring if they had crossed the line on a touchy subject. But through it all this debate team became one of the most successful teams in America. They were undefeated after they won national championships over Harvard University.
A theory is defined as an explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a compilation of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Theory is not scientific law, which is a natural phenomenon that has been proven as absolute truth. However, in the public-school setting, evolution, a theory concerning the Earth’s origins, is established as an indisputable fact allowing no room for other theories, specifically creationism, to be taught. These two battling theories uphold two opposing perspectives that attempt to explain the creation and development of life.
Heraclitus Heraclitus is a Greek philosopher of which not much is known beyond his works. What we do know is that he lived in Ephesus, a city on the Ionian coast of Asia Minor, and that his character has largely been inferred from his writings on philosophical issues. Two philosophical theories come to mind when the name Heraclitus is mentioned: The Doctrine of Flux and the Unity of Opposites. In his espousal of these theories he managed to draw the ire of many -- even Aristotle and Plato, who believed that his hypothesis of the world was one of logical incoherence.