The Universality Of Human Rights

1590 Words7 Pages
Human rights can be said that it is part of a world social process which can be expressed as the international law of human rights. Further, international law is seen as an inter-cultural law, and an appeal to international law is the evidence of the universal standard of human rights. Regardless of this justification, it is said that universality of human rights must be recognised in the context of the different cultures that exist .
When discussing the universality of human rights, Dias has identified three main types of attack on the universality of human rights i.e.; the proponents of New World Order, governments of the developing countries and the leadership of religious fundamentalism and ethnic anarchism. He has further stated that the reasons for these are: to justify the denial of human rights to some sections of people, to deny new assertions of human rights by excluding women and indigenous people, to destroy cultural pluralism and to impose disabilities based on culture, religion, ethnicity, and more upon minorities .
The basic meaning of human rights is that each individual has an inherent right as to what he or she should do, but that right when exercising should not violate another individual’s right. Taking this into consideration it can be further stated that these human rights also have certain restrictions as stated above. Further, the role in regard to cultures and traditions as well as religious norms comes into play in restricting the human rights;
Open Document