Throughout history the role of power, specifically in the police institution has been a controversial topic. Police work started as an institution purely based on personal and community judgment, often leading to wrongful verdicts. Specifically policing in the 1970’s through the 1990’s experienced a significant amount of change. In order to diminish or reduce corruption the Knapp commission, and Blue Ribbon Panels were put into place. However, throughout time police policies, and state laws evolved into a new institution devoted to “ service and professionalism, and responsibility for public safety and ethical conduct”(Dodge, Rennison, 120). Nevertheless this does not mean police corruption and questionable acts do not still plague the institution. Due to the elevated …show more content…
In this sense the news reports weekly cases involving unnecessary force especially involving minority and at risk groups. The Trayvon Martin case comes to mind along with the Stop & Frisk program started in New York. In this way power bears bad in this institution. Especially with today’s technology, videos and voice recordings are used as evidence with police using wrongful force. For example the officer that tackled a girl at a birthday party was caught on video about a couple of months ago. It streamed on social networks and news stations across the country, terrifying and angering people over wrongful police force. The question comes up whether discretion turns into discrimination and is this discrimination racially fueled? In the textbook it talked about how police can give warnings depending on the interaction with the victim, however when does this discretion turn into discrimination based on race and gender. It is wrongful to say the entire institution is motivated to use unnecessary force; most are right in knowing the legalistic limit. It is the few that ruin how Americans see cops and police in relation to the
Law enforcement transgression was a solemn issue that has been dated back to the 17th century. Sherman (1974) describes the early corruption that: “Despite several attempts at reform, the Renaissance police of Paris were often said to be in a league with
Some critics have argued that local police departments may have altered their statistics to produce internal promotions or departmental positions to support issues relating to crime and crime control that may or may not exist in their vicinity ( jblearning p 63). Most critics acknowledge, that there is potential for manipulation of the data records are not so great as to
Those with power will continue to exploit and oppress those below them, leading to the breakdown of all decency between human beings, and the loss of all positive human interactions and relationships. This is important in our society today as it relates to issues prevalent in our society such as police brutality. According to the US Department of Justice, 52% of police officers agreed with the statement that it is not unusual for law enforcement officials to turn a blind eye to the improper conduct of other officers, showing how deep-rooted police misconduct is in our institutions. These issues remain to be prevalent in our society and the corrupting effect of power affects every facet of society. Police will continue to abuse their power, leading to civilians constantly fearing for their lives.
According to Lee, Moore, and Kim (2013), some police supervisors are not only reluctant to reveal their subordinates’ misconduct, but are intentionally blind to their officers’ corruption. Oftentimes, supervisors who are willfully ignorant of corrupt behavior resist disciplining their officers, which, in turn, insulates dishonest officers from punishment. Therefore, the failure to discipline problem officers is a proximate cause of continuous police corruption. Frontline police officers are more likely to perceive corruption seriously when their supervisors apply more severe discipline for corrupt behavior. Frontline police officers are less likely to perceive corruption seriously when their departments have a stronger ‘Code of Silence’.
reveals how many more stops and searches are conducted against racial minorities than would be the case if they were targeted at the same rate as white individuals. These tests were consistent and show that racial minorities would receive disproportionate police attention compared to the white individuals. Furthermore, included within this protection of human rights is the use police officer’s discretion to exercise force. Without a strong exercise of control over an officer’s use of force, citizens would be at the mercy of the police able to exercise extreme amounts of physical control over them with little, or no, provocation, or at a level that is not proportional to the situation at hand.
In the black community, there have been many questionable incidents between police officers and black citizens. An officer might approach an African American who broke the law differentially than a White American based on their own discretion. Whereby an officer would hesitate to immediately arrest a white person for breaking the same law, they would handle the arrest of a black person differently. This is problematic: Police discretion impacts the way the society views the criminal justice system by having too much range on enforcing the law.
Corruption in the law enforcement is still a great issue we face today and there is ways to prevent this heinous act of selfishness such as having a strong leadership and operational procedures in the sense that law offices should always have an eye kept on them by higher officials. Of course there are police officials that work for the law and abide by the rules, but the litter of corruption can soil the whole reputation of the police department. By constantly keeping up with regulation and monitoring the actions of a police officials, corruption can be prevented and eventually be stopped permanently. (Grant
The second power that I am going to evaluate is the amount of force a police officer can use whilst they are arresting a suspect, entering a premises or searching a vehicle. I think that when it comes to an arrest the police must use force as a way of not letting the suspect escape but also to arrest the suspect. If a suspect is using aggressive force against a police officer then then that police officer can use more force to overpower the suspect and get the suspect in a good position where they cannot use any force. If on the other hand the suspect was compliant with the police officer by doing everything they ask, not being abusive or using any force then the police are likely to be more lenient with them and might not even use handcuffs
U.S polices are discriminatory because of police brutality. For example, according to Katel (2016), a seventeen-year-old boy named Laquan McDonald was brutally shot sixteen times by a Chicago police officer. This explains how U.S policies are discriminatory because the police officer undoubtedly took the situation out of proportions. Additionally, the author claimed that Chicago police shot a grandmother who was unarmed and in the process critically shot a nineteen-year-old college student who was mentally unstable (Katel, 2016). This explains how U.S policies are discriminatory because shooting a grandmother who was unarmed and a mentally unstable college student is insensitive.
The media makes the severity of the situation much worse. In some instances, a situation is represented in way that conveys a case as deceptive. Police misconduct, in this situation, is preposterously distorted. For example, the scene one sees on television may be completely inaccurate. In the article Unpacking Public Attitudes to the Police: Contrasting Perceptions of Misconduct with Traditional Measures of Satisfaction, Miller states, “…research found that people's fear of crime was related to crime content in the newspapers they read…”( 6).
For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that
So “Addressing police misconduct” from source #3, I’ve found that the law enforcement officers, perform very difficult jobs, with respect for their communities and in compliance with the law. But with all the incidents this is often in
There are many pros and cons when it comes to the use of police force. The use of force is strictly a part of the job requirement of protecting and serving our community. It is the everyday battles that force police to make decisions that may seem a bit harsh at times. The use of force is only acceptable under certain circumstances and should only be used when absolutely needed. There are cases when civilians are saved by the use of police force, and there are cases when innocent people are hurt or even killed by the use of police force.
The officers answered in such a way that they contradicted themselves when it came to abuse of power. They tended to say that few officers partook in such conduct and that it wasn’t uncommon for officers to turn a blind eye to any misconduct that did occur. The officers thought that the education and training they received was sufficient for keeping any unwanted actions at bay. And finally, the officers believed that switching from a militarized policing style to one that is more community based has lowered the chances of committing such acts; although, this has yet to be confirmed by any statistical backing. The officers are, in fact, more likely to commit another deviant act as a direct result of the sanctions imposed (Weisburd, Greenspan, Hamilton, Williams, and Bryant 2000).
Many police agencies today have established a code of ethics, or codes of conduct, and it easy to find parallels between Peel’s principles and present policies and