In A Man for All Seasons by Robert Bolt, Sir Thomas More faces controversy when he refuses to give his opinion on the divorce of King Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. As a previous chancellor, More uses his knowledge of the law to defend himself against Thomas Cromwell, the Chief Advisor to Henry VIII, and his schemes. By using silence as a weapon of defense, More protects himself from high treason and does not make his opinion known to the wanting public. Through his strong faith, More resists temptation brought on by Cromwell and Richard Rich to stay true to his conscious. Using silence, law, and faith, Sir Thomas More effectively resists the efforts and schemes of Henry and his regime in A Man for All Seasons.
The reader first witnesses
…show more content…
The first example, when Cromwell tries to make Sir Thomas More accept the divorce, “You’re a constant regret to me, Thomas. If you could just see facts flat on, without that more squint; with just a little common sense, you could have been a statesman”. Cromwell threatens More, suggesting that he will be removed from his position as Lord Chancellor if he does not comply to the demands of the king. Another example, when they try to lead him to temptation to crumble and break his silence, “When a man takes an oath, Meg, he’s holding his own self in his own hands. Like water. And if he opens his fingers then, he needn’t hope to find himself again”. More explains to his daughter, Meg, that when a man takes an oath, he holds himself accountable to his own conscience and will risk his own life to uphold it. As they try until the trial, Sir Thomas More stays in the cell, trusts in his faith, and says, “I am the king’s good servant, but God’s first”. Displaying his dedication to his faith, More still puts God first before another, he when the King and most others act and speak against him. Even as Cromwell was trying to pursue him, he kept his conscience and intellect in God before any other superior. He says, “I do none harm, I say none harm, I think none harm. And if this be not enough to keep a man alive, in good faith I long not to live”. Sir Thomas More would risk his own life rather than compromise his principles, and he trusts that God will reward him for his faithfulness. Sir Thomas more upholds his morality and faith in God, choosing not to stray from his own
This abrupt sentence elicits a sense of urgency in readers, causing them to view the author’s argument with
The list of the persecuted includes many such as Cardinal Wolsey, Little Bilney, and he even shows a modicum of sympathy towards Thomas More. She writes while adding plenty of additional details on the aftermath of Boughton’s burning, “When they had got a bowlful, the woman who was holding it said: ‘Give me your hand.’ Trusting, he held it out to her. She dipped her fingers into the bowl. She placed on the back of his hand a smear of mud and grit, fat and ash.
Such an example is when he implores, “And what is a Tory? Good God! What is he?” (Paine). For context, Tories, also known as Loyalists, were colonists during the Revolutionary War that continued to support the king and were opposed to the war.
For example, Henry highlights the cowardice of the colonists when he emphasizes that they must “fulfill the great responsibility which we [colonists] hold to god and our country” (Henry 83). Henry appeals to his audience by assessing their religious values, then patriotism. By constructing this statement declaratively, the audience senses Henry’s passion and frustration with the lack of resistance that the colonists have shown to Britain's corrupt ways. Therefore, the audience believes it is a necessity to not only listen but to agree with a statement so direct.
Karina Walter Ms. Stout Advanced English 10 October 2, 2014 Similar Rhetoric and Theme in “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” and “The Call to Rebellion” Despite Differences in Context The contexts, mediums, genres, and topics of two situations will always differ in some way. However, the ways individuals handle these situations might be quite similar and produce similar, and often successful, outcomes. To obtain these outcomes, an individual must use language effectively to persuade his or her audience. Patrick Henry and Henry Highland Garnet, despite speaking in different situations, both use language to their advantage.
The reader is taken back after all of the evidence is laid before
"More weight," he says. And died” (1352). To keep his silence at the cost of death was a dangerous action, requiring endurance, fearlessness, and overall courage. The only two words he said were more than enough to prove not only his dedication and determination. Giles knew of the consequences laid out for him, yet, similar to Mary Warren, he still put his life at
Thomas More was a dedicated Catholic man, so because of this he did not approve of divorces. This was a problem when King Henry decided he wanted to divorce his current wife in order to re-marry another woman. Thomas More and his beliefs represent the person that escapes the caves because he doesn’t let the shadows that are being portrayed on the wall which would be lust, passion, and sex come in conflict with his beliefs that come with his religion. King Henry and his followers do not approve of Thomas More beliefs because it intrudes King Henry’s crave for the shadows that are portrayed on the wall; therefore, King Henry executes
C.S. Lewis, a Christian writer from England, penned a manuscript in 1942 called The Screwtape Letters that examined the temptations presented to man by Satan. “Lewis's Screwtape Letters was certainly one of his most popular works, and by his own admission it was a work that he found easy to write” (Harwood 24). By being a Christian himself, Lewis could sympathize and identify with fellow Christians undergoing the onslaught of spiritual attacks. Christians struggle daily with the temptations of Satan similar to those that Screwtape directs his nephew, Wormwood, to employ towards the Patient. In The Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis uses the character, Patient, to symbolize everyman and his struggles with overcoming temptations by showing how Screwtape attempts to conjure a plan for Wormwood to lure the Patient to the Devil’s camp with Satan’s insipid temptations of vanity,
“We are apt to shut our eyes to a painful truth” (264). He uses this because he knows that this will help them open their eyes and face the truth. Another example would be when said “ They are sent to bind and rivet upon us with those chains… " ( 265). He said this because if they do not do anything about their problem then they're basically chained by the British and if they do not face it they will be under the control their forever. He uses this to show that they are like slaves in imprisonment.
Throughout the first chapters of Their Eyes Were Watching God, readers gain
More put God at the center of his decisions for example when he refused to say that Henry VIII was the head of the church he neglected it and kept God as the center. He was then beheaded and then the Church blessed him in 1886 and became a saint in 1935. Even at his trial he always kept God’s role in his life. “I die the king’s good servant, and God’s first”-Thomas More. More would rather give himself up to the devil this is being said in the reading of “Thomas More as statesmen,” “More would give the devil himself benefit of law for the sake of justice and peace.”
An example of this is Hamlet says "Should have fatted all the region kites With this slave's offal: bloody, bawdy villain! Remorseless, treacherous, lecherous, kindless villain," (I,2). This quote shows how Hamlet battles his inner-self and his own ideas. Hamlet thinks about a choice of whether he should give up as a passive nihilist would, or to go his own way and choices with active nihilism. These Nihilistic views are apparent and strong throughout