Nature: A predetermined trait. Nurture: A learned trait. How do these terms affect a person's life? This is a heavily debated topic when referring to an environment, one such environment is Oakland.
How do we become who we are today? Are we born this way, or are we slowly transformed by the world around us? This controversy is most often recognized as the nature verses nurture conflict. Some people believe that it is strictly genes that affects our ways of life, others believe that it is the environment that affects us. Though genetics makes us who we are genetically, the environment in which we are raised directly shapes our life.
Nature versus Nurture is an age old debate in Psychology. Nature vs Nurture relates to an individuals behaviour and characteristics and whether they are inherited through their DNA and genes, which can be seen as an innate approach to the debate. This is because innatism believes that the mind is born with all knowledge. Nurture states our behaviour and characteristics are learned through our environment and experiences, This therefore can be seen as empiricist approach as empiricism states that we are born a blank slate and everything we know is learned through our senses. Reproductive behaviour looks at how patterns are established and formed to continue the survival of humanity.
Nature is the predetermined traits that people are born with, while nurture is the influence that affects people after they’re born. The debate surrounding Nature V. Nurture is how much of a person’s traits is predetermined and how much is influenced by the environment. Mary Shelley's believes in nurture more than nature. Victor Frankenstein has certain traits that he’s born with. Frankenstein is born into a prestigious, wealthy family.
Nature vs Nurture is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. Each side has good points and is really hard to decide which is correct if either. Nature and nurture play roles in human development. Nature is what is in your genes (heredity) and nurture is how you grew up (social environment). I have always heard that if you grow up in an abusive home you have a higher chance of entering an abusive relationship yourself.
The debate of Nature Versus Nurture have been going on for many years and still today theorists are debating whether the development of a child is influence by genetic or environmental. After reading Genetic and Environmental Foundation in chapter 2 of “Infants, Children, and Adolescents” and listening to “Twins Data Reshaping Nature Versus Nurture Debate” podcast they both agree that it all starts with the genes. They also state the scientific facts regarding both nature and nurture. The difference in the two resources is one states only the facts and the other not only states the facts, but also has examples by having twins convey their experiences and options of nature versus nurture plays in their situation. I really enjoyed the podcast
If you suppose you were born already with a personality, then you agree with nature. But if you believe that your personality made you who you are based on the type of environment you were influenced by in your life, then you agree with nurture. Nature is more of the physical image determined by our genes, it is the belief
Example: The Rastafarian who has been believes that eating meat is forbidden would say that the person who eats meat is doing something that is wrong or improper. In the nature vs nurture debate, nature is often defined in this debate as genetic or hormone-based behaviours, while nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experience.
Lastly is that Nature and Nurture should not be disentangled. Although both nature and nurture play some part in development of an individual, they are not dependent aspects of psychology that is required for one to be influenced. For each individual, it is different and the factors of each concept influence individuals differently around the
Sigmund Freud was a popular Austrian Neurologist who greatly impacted the world of Psychology . He was known for his theories on libido, the ego, child sexuality and many other topics, while his development of Psychoanalysis theories and techniques was his best known work. He believed that the id, the ego, and the superego were the 3 major elements that the mind was composed of. Freud mainly had a deep interest of caring for others. Freud was born on May 6, 1856 in Freiberg, Moravia.
Freud was obsessed with the fact that we all have the dynamic unconscious controlling us and he came up with this theory called psychoanalysis in which he said that the dynamic unconscious tries to control our conscious and theory. Freud tried to get people to talk about mind, things like dream to bring out the unconscious, which is contained to I’d, ego, and superego; I’d is a basic need, ego is other needs and superego is the way to act. Freud a is psychological theory lead the study of mind and he developed the talking cure to help mentally people recover and to him, our minds are in the unconscious, which means we not aware of everything at all, but preconscious which means that it is what we aware
Physical features, although unique in some measure, are proven to be acquired from the biological parents of any organism. The Nature v. Nurture debate relates to humans and how they develop their unique behavioral habits. Many who support the Nature Theory endorse essentially that a person’s intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation pertain primarily to their DNA stemmed from their biological parents (Powell). For example, if someone’s parents are depressed or violent, the Nature Theory supporters conclude that their offspring will also bear these negative these traits.
The promoters of nature in the nature versus nurture debate are known as hereditarians or nativists. They feel that “our character and predispositions are innate” (Psych 2010), therefore nature has the only effect on our personality and the way we act has been ingrained in our psyche from birth. To nativists, nurture has no part in the development of a child. These beliefs come from “main assumptions of evolutionary theories of human reproductive behavior.
The nature vs. nurture debate centers on whether human behaviour and personality are inherited (nature) or acquired (nurture); in other words, whether a person’s environment or a person’s genetic inheritance determines their behaviour and personality. Goldsmith and Harman (1994) adopt a neutral position, in which both nature and nurture influence people, stating that they “believe that the fundamental issue concerns the interplay between characteristics of the individual and of the relationship” (54). Goldsmith and Harman discuss temperament and attachment for infant, with temperament being linked to the nature side of the debate and attachment being linked with the nurture side; as a result, the infant’s temperament influences the attachment bond between the infant and the mother, but the attachment bond influences the temperament of the child as well. Therefore, both nature and nurture interact with each other to produce people’s behaviour (Harman et al. 54). Andersen and Berk (1998) take on the nurture perspective, while Leary (1999) claims that nature is the determining factor of a person’s personality.
The nature versus nurture theory focuses on how we behave and whether it is natural or learned throughout our life. The nature part of the theory is what makes us human from our genes or hormones that were passed down from our parents. This means that in some cases we are born to act like our parents, but
