The Weeping Camel is a movie based in the Mongolia 's Gobi desert about a newborn camel which belongs to a group of nomadic shepherds. The group are a tight knit family who work together to complete their daily lifestyles. Camels are an important part to their lifestyles using them for milk, fur and also breeding them. When one of the camels give birth to a white calf, the shepherds are intrigued by this as it is a rare occurrence for a white calf to be born. As the young calf begins its life, the shepherds watch as the Colt is rejected by its mother. They come to realise that due to the difficult delivery when the Colt was born, the mother refuses to nurse the young camel. The shepherds know that if the mother continues to reject the Colt, it will slowly die as without its mother milk it will die. To try saves the Colt life, the …show more content…
It shows to never give up on making sure that everyone appreciate the importance of family even if you don 't always agree and get along. To never give up is also shown as the family continue to try and get the mother camel to except the Colt.
Before watching the movie The Weeping Camel, I was expecting it to be a movie about nomadic shepherds lifestyle and how camels are an important part to their lifestyle. As the title of the movie is The Weeping Camel, I was also expecting the movie to be about a camel who is having troubles causing it to weep. I was interested to learn about the culture and what rituals they use on a daily basis.
The plot is an easy and believable storyline to follow. It is set out in a usual movie structure; the Setup, the Confrontation and the Resolution. Although the movie is more like a documentary, it makes it easier to understand the storyline whilst still making it interesting for the viewers. The movie is more believable compared to other movies as it is based in a true story and based around a family who actually lives the way it is shown in the
I liked the movie better than the book. Reason being is because it was easier to feel the mood in the movie. It was harder to understand the mood in the book than it was in the
The reason I think the movie was better is because it gave me a better visualization of what was happening. Another reason being is that it had a greater impact on how I felt.
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
First of all, I think this because the movie showed more which made me comprehend it more. The setting in the movie made me comprehend it more which in the movie I didn’t see the setting that well. Another reason why I think the movies made me comprehend it more is because I got to visually see where the characters were living and telling us their story.
It was around 7 on a hot August afternoon in 1965, in a Los Angeles south central neighborhood; when a twenty-one year old man named Marquette Frye was on his way home after a few beers to drop off his Brother. Not far from his house they were pulled over by an officer Lee Minkus who then proceeded to give Marquette Frye a field sobriety test. As Mr. Frye stumbled along the curb his brother Ronald Frye walked a few blocks over to the Frye residence and shortly returned with their mother. As the events unfolded the number of curious onlookers grew.
Firstly, in my opinion I think it has more details than the movie. The book has the same characters but in the book there is three sisters. The book had details that felt so real. It described everything, the setting and the mood.
The film focuses on the characters lives and how they can keep going when they struggle with society. The film uses rhetorical strategies such as pathos, ethos, and logos to make this movie bring emotions, blank stares, and leave the audience to question reality. The purpose of the specific camera shots and angles is to provide an appropriate view of the movie. Lastly, the use of persuasion to allow the audience to interpret what the film says versus the thoughts in their head. The film does a good job of pointing out the flaws in our system and a specific culture that the flaws
You can understand it because it gives you detail about what’s happening and why that is happening. The faces of everybody in the video help you understand how they feel about Dachina and her going through adulthood. Also the video helps you see the changes of Dachina before and after “The Apache Girls Rites of Passage”.
However, when I watched the movie, I felt as though everything I had imagined in my head from reading the book was wrong. Although, this might be the case since I read the book first, and then compared it to the
Overall, the movie was better than the play because it went into more depth and detail into Anne’s feelings. This movie was a real eye opener to what Jews had to experience during the reign of the Nazi
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
The Hollywood version was good when it comes to the setting, but it was difficult to understand where they were because it was dark and there wasn’t any description on where they were. Since She’s The Man showed more setting changes, it is easier to watch and more
The movie showed many special effects you wouldn't get from the book. In the middle of the movie there were holograms of the chief elder (the person with the most power over the community) she comes to the community to assign the community their jobs/career. I acknowledge the way it looked like a hologram but believable from the book it was confusing how it explained her being here but not being there. The movie gave me a better understanding that she was there in hologram form.
If I didn 't have the book I still think that I would be able to follow along with the movie and know what is going on. I really did like the story. It was different than any other books. It was funny and adventures but at times it was very mature. The lesson that anyone can learn is don 't change something you believe in because other people say it is not true.
In order to believe or have complete faith in something or a higher power you need to trust in what you are believing in. Which was portrayed realistically in the movie. The crowd needed proof to see that it was real. As mentioned, when the main character made accurate statements and the people confirmed it was true, then the crowd opened up. Whether it is overly dramatized is also in the middle.