Borrowing objects and items from people is a very common occurrence in everyone’s life. From shoes to kitchenware, most people will admit to borrowing something from someone. Every once in awhile though, commandeering other people’s items temporarily can lead to the worst case scenario happening. In “The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant, a bored housewife named Mathilde gets the opportunity to live her dream of being an upper class socialite through her husband’s work. After begging for an incredibly expensive dress and other accessories for the evening, she decides that she needs an equally costly necklace to complete her outfit. Luckily, her neighbor lets her borrow an extravagant necklace with huge jewels on it. After the party is said and …show more content…
Through simple observation of Mathilde’s actions and choices, there is an underlying theme of obsession and the want to impress those who are more well off than others. Mathilde dreams of lavish parties and begs to be taken out by her husband when he can because she believes that she deserves a spot in the elite social groups. Once she captures her night to be noticed, she does more than ensure that she looks and feels exactly how she wants to on that night. Everything she does, from forcing her husband to buy her an entire outfit to putting herself in crippling debt so she doesn't upset her neighbor, all happen because of her obsession with making everything perfect. Even when she is in times of turmoil, such as putting herself in debt to replace the costume jewelry, she still recalls the one evening of living extravagantly and being different from her normal life. Mathilde would have much rather replaced an expensive piece of jewelry than admit that the necklace was unfortunately lost, which shows that she has pride in her appearance and personality to the public. Mathilde's pride and obsession with being perfect was what ultimately caused her to be anything but because it consumed all of her time and energy, just like her obsession with her how her persona to the public is …show more content…
We both became more comfortable with concealing the truth and hiding what actually happened to save ourselves instead of revealing what really happened. I resonated with Mathilde’s want to have everything work out for her in the end, and would have rather lied about breaking my Mom’s glass originally. Thankfully, I now am way more honest when I accidentally mess up and break something, but I will always remember to never take the route of guilt and shame while trying to fix an almost unfixable problem, just like Mathilde decided to do with her neighbor’s necklace. While Mathilde and I had very different objects and outcomes of our stories, we both learned that honesty and admitting to mistakes may sometimes cause the most positive
De Maupassant's “The Necklace” characterizes Mathilde Loisel, the main character, as a beautiful, egotistic woman who desires only wealthy apparel. He emphasizes the negative results of narcissism by blinding Mathilde with that trait
This is all shown very well and nicely put in the story “The Necklace”. In “The Necklace” Mathilde, the main character thought that she deserved the best, she should have been a rich women. Mathilde never got that, she married a man who could still provide her with a nice life, with a home, and food, but that was not good enough for her, she needed the perfect life. It was never going to happen, her husband did not have a good enough job to make that kind of money.
This life lasted ten years.” (Maupassant, 4) After the ten years of the hard life, Mathilde was able to pay back her debt from the necklace. She lost her house and her precious
She attempts to act as though things of luxury are nothing new to her, as members of the elite would. An instance this ideal becomes apparent is when she speaks of her dress, which represents her trying to assimilate into the upper class. In fact, “with the influence of the dress her personality had also undergone a change”(34), and upon being complimented on her dress she responds “‘It’s just a crazy old thing,’ she said. ‘I just slip it on sometimes when I don’t care what I look like’”(35). As a wife of an auto-shop owner, she hasn’t seen too much luxury in her life, and a luxurious dress of chiffon is not of commonplace to her.
Even though Della and Mathilde are characters from different stories, they have a number of similarities and differences regarding their physical description, words and actions, thoughts and feelings, and finally others reactions. First, both of these characters have a bunch of similarities. Although Mathilde considers herself to be born deprived from all refinements of life, she is more beautiful than any character in the story, as the passage suggests,“She was prettier than all others, elegant, gracious, smiling and crazy with joy.” (De Maupassant).
In the short story “The Necklace” Madame Loisel was a rich women who thought she was poor. She valued having a nice appearance and looking elegant. Madame Loisel borrowed a necklace that she thought was gorgeous, she then lost the necklace but didn’t want to tell the lady she lost it so she went to look for
The protagonist of ‘The Necklace’, Madame Loisel, live a rather steady, ordinary middle-class life in the beginning of the story. However, she views that she is intended for a luxurious life, and, therefore, does not cherish what she has. She takes a step forward to her desires, as she was invited to a ball where all the upper-class women would be, yet she was
Guy de Maupassant, the author of "The Necklace", uses foreshadowing to develop the theme that there are consequences for being untruthful. Foreshadowing gives the reader hints to predict a result in the story. In the text, Mrs.Loisel "didn't listen to him and rapidly descend the stairs. " The quote shows foreshadowing because when Mrs.Loisel didn't listen to her husband, and instead quickly left the party, it gave the reader a hint that something is going to happen to Mrs.Loisel. As the story progresses, the story states that Mrs.Loisel lost the diamond necklace and created a plan to trick Mrs.Forestier into thinking that she never lost the necklace.
Furthermore, family-wise, there are not many similarities between these two characters. Roger has no family to support him and he needs to provide for himself. Mathilde however, has a loving and doting husband, wanting to please her with fancy dresses and invitations to parties. Her husband may love her, but in the story “The Necklace”, he told her to lie about losing the necklace and instead say that they broke the clasp and had to replace it. In saying this, her husband basically got them into this whole “I’m poor, woe is me” mess.
In the second paragraph of the story the author states that she is suffering because she doesn't have the things she wants by saying, “She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury. She suffered from the poorness of her house, from its mean walls, worn chairs, and ugly curtains.” (Guy de Maupassant 2) “She had no clothes, no jewels, nothing. And these were the only things she loved;” (Guy de Maupassant 2) The author included this to let the readers know what kind of “Poverty” Matilde was living in. Mathilde doesn't seem to love her husband as much.
Although Mathilde considers herself to be born deprived from all refinements of life, she is more beautiful than any character in the story, as the passage suggests,“She was prettier than all others, elegant, gracious, smiling and crazy with joy.” (De Maupassant). On the other hand, Della’s hair is so gorgeous that it could even devalue the queen of Sheba’s jewels (Henry). Another similarity between Mathilde and Della is that both of them are affected due to their lack of money. Della suffers because she struggles to buy Jim a present (Henry).
The narrator illustrates Mathilde’s quality of selfishness after her husband asks her how much money she would like for a dress by remarking, “She thought over it… going over her allowance... thinking also of the amount she could ask for without bringing immediate refusal” (222). This portrays Mathilde's greed because she knows she is asking for more money than she needs for a suitable dress. Later, readers discover Mathilde is careless. When she first finds out the necklace is missing, she and her husband have a conversation. Monsieur Loisel asks, “Are you sure you had it when leaving the dance…if you had lost it on the street, we'd have heard it drop.
She was never happy and satisfied with what she had and always daydreamed of large ballrooms… decorated with oriental tapestries and lighted by high bronze floor lamps. She wanted to be the envy of all other women. When her husband gets an invite to the ball she wishes to appear wealthy to the other women at the ball. She borrows a diamond necklace from a wealthy friend, Mme Forestier. At the ball, she becomes pretty, elegant, gracious and smiling than all the other ladies, and she finds herself enjoying the party.
The protagonist of ‘The Necklace’, Madame Loisel, live a rather steady, ordinary middle-class life in the beginning of the story. However, she views that she is intended for a luxurious life, and, therefore, does not cherish what she has. She takes a step forward to her desires, as she was invited to a ball where all the upper-class woman would be, yet she was unhappy with the fact that she does not even have a stone to put on.
The graduated design calls attention to the woman's collar bone and has endured in popularity throughout centuries. The elegant graduated necklace enhances a woman's beauty with its timeless