ipl-logo

David Mitrany: A Comparative Analysis

840 Words4 Pages

As in many other areas, there are competing theories and theoretic approaches in the field of international relations. Realism which emphasizes state-centric view1 and has conflictual/ competitive tendencies, idealism and liberalism which focuses on cooperation and mutual understanding is only some of them which will be also discussed in this essay. For many academicians and theorists, the driving force is ensuring a more stable and peaceful world order, but they brought out different suggestions. Both before and after World War II, the necessity of intergovernmental organizations in order to establish a cooperative international system, became one of the main subject of debates. I will proceed by analyzing the arguments of David Mitrany’s …show more content…

1948: 351) He approaches them in terms of their practicality hence, beside the advantages he considers federalism as inappropriate because of its rigidities; geographical, ideological and own structure. (Mitrany, D. 1948: 353) According to him, idea of federalism forms new kind of nationalism rather than new internationalism. When the structure and binding rules of federalism is taken into account, Mitrany is quite convincing. Because even in old established federations, there is possibility that collective works were hindered instead of being broadened by modifying federal arrangements. The degree of power is prevented from deliberate change in periods of crisis and therefore, rather than federalism, functional arrangements makes new internationalism possible. The order starts with simple problems, generally with technical issues and states “bind together those interests which are common, where they are common, and to the extent to which they are common.” (Luard, E. 2016:501) The cooperation launched by non-political issues, eventually evolves into cooperation in political affairs. This is very deterministic approach of functionalism. Therefore, I would follow more realistic perspective within this order, as Edward Carr did. Although it is likely to separate political debates from the functional cooperation between member states, peace is not result of this, rather peace actually creates necessary conditions for

Show More
Related

  • Why Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

    954 Words  | 4 Pages

    The central government has enough power to help some of the country’s major needs and the state government has enough power to help the state’s needs because the state’s needs may be more specific. From this, you may conclude that dividing powers between the central and state governments prevents

    Read More

  • Difference Between Dual And Cooperative Federalism

    230 Words  | 1 Pages

    When political sciences look at federalism there is two main models the dual and cooperative. Dual is the theory about the proper relationship between the states and the national government. It is has four major parts the first is that the national government only rules by enumerated powers. Number two is that the national government has a limited amount of constitutional purposes. Third both government national, and state is sovereign within its sphere.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Vs Federalism Dbq

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalism is the division of power between central and State Goverments. Document A states " The power surrendered by the people is first divided by two distinct Goverments and the portion alotted to each subdivided between distinct and separate departments". The powers that are given

    Read More

  • Tyranny Dbq Essay

    797 Words  | 4 Pages

    Federalism is a fair way to divide powers, so that one group or person would not have more power than the rest when they are building and enforcing laws. This is reliable because federalism equally shares the powers. Therefore, it would not be biased while constructing the laws since everyone would have a say, unlike if one ruler would have all the

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Guard Against Tyranny

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Federalism itself is a main contributor to the protection and guard against

    Read More

  • Dual Federalism

    1114 Words  | 5 Pages

    Federalism is a system in which the power is shared between the national and regional government, following democratic rules. a. Dual Federalism: The first period of federalism was from 1789 to 1937, called dual federalism. In this stage, there was equality between the national and state government, but the functions of each of them were fundamentally separated; they rarely operate together.

    Read More

  • Fema Vs Cooperative Federalism

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    Federalism is one of the most important and innovative concepts in the U.S. Constitution, although the word never appears there. Federalism is the sharing of power between national and state governments. In America, the states existed first, and they struggled to create a national government. There are many states, which always face storm and flood, and there is an agency which provides service to rescue and helps the victims and family which is called federal emergency management agency and it is established for over 200 years. However, there were many times where FEMA failed to do their job properly for example the hurricane Katrina and New Orleans was at particular risk.

    Read More

  • New Federalism Essay

    869 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since the end of the American Civil War, Federalism has been a very important idea in the United States. Federalism has appeared in many instances within different governmental ideas. The original idea of Federalism gave up states’ rights and handed them to the government to create a more centralized federal system. Over time Federalism has had many views by different leaders in our government. These viewpoints began with Ronald Reagan’s idea of “New-Federalism,” and carried on throughout time involving the Violence Against Women Act and more recently the urge to modify the Affordable Care Act.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Dual Federalism

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay Federalism

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    Federalism Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between federal government, state government and provinces government. While federalism has many benefits, among them is checks and balances between the federal and state government, thus reducing the chances of one party getting too powerful and abusing their power. Preventing one party from being too powerful and abusing their powers is a good thing. However, it comes with a price that federal and provinces (state and local) governments do not always see eye to eye and agree with each other, which turns into conflict.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Adam Watson's Evolution Of International Society

    740 Words  | 3 Pages

    national politics Adam Watson’s Evolution of International Society gave a new dimension in the understanding of international relations (IR). He deeply studied comparatively the formation of international society and political community of the past which has evolved into the modern world system in his ‘Evolution of International Society’. Unlike Kenneth Waltz views of anarchy as the only system in IR, Watson says there are two systems viz. anarchy and hierarchy. In between these systems is the hegemony which defines the contemporary IR.

    Read More

  • The Twenty Years Crisis Summary

    1207 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the study of International Relations, the book for which E.H. Carr is perhaps most remembered was written just prior to the outbreak of World War Two (WWII). This particular work of Carr’s is primarily a study of the fundamentals of International Relations, which is exemplified especially by the events of the two decades before 1939, the year the book was published. In the Twenty Years Crisis, E.H. Carr explores the interplay of the worldview between Utopians and Realists. Carr’s work examines why the League of Nations and the peace as implemented by the Treaty of Versailles failed, ultimately resulting in WWII.

    Read More

  • Cooperative Federalism Research Paper

    421 Words  | 2 Pages

    Federalism is the federal principle or system of government. The united states looks for the government and looks out for federalism. Federalism is a very big part to our congress and government. Some types of federalism is dual, cooperative, new, and regulated federalism. Federalism was created in 1776-1996.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Realism And Liberalism

    1938 Words  | 8 Pages

    The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Realism And Idealism

    1381 Words  | 6 Pages

    The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous with the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists, however, expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact, both they must be viewed as actors.

    Read More

More about David Mitrany: A Comparative Analysis

Open Document