Erik Erickson Theoretical Framework

Theoretical framework
Erik Erikson based on Freud's thoughts and augmented his hypothesis by focusing on the psycho social parts of advancement past early adolescence. His hypothesis of improvement holds that psycho sexual development and psycho social development happen together, and that at each phase of life we confront the assignment of building up harmony amongst ourselves and our social world. He depicts advancement as far as the whole life expectancy, separated by particular emergencies to be settled. As indicated by Erikson, an emergency is equal to a defining moment in life when we can possibly push ahead or to relapse. At these defining moments, we can either resolve our contentions or neglect to ace the formative errand. To

As I have a crystal clear sense of my identity, I no longer need to fear "losing" myself, the same number of youths do. A few people appear to show the "fear of responsibility" a case of adolescence in this stage. This dread is not generally so self-evident. As I live in boarding school, most of my time spent far away from home. Subsequently, I turn out to be more intimate with my companions and conversely I feel awkward with my family members. As stated by Boeree (1997), if you grow up in countryside and remained in your group, and particularly if your group is a provincial one, you are substantially more prone to have profound, durable fellowships, to have hitched the secondary school sweetheart, and to feel an awesome love for the group. However, this style of life is rapidly turning into an erroneous date. Erikson calls the maladaptive shape in discrimination, referring especially to the inclination to wind up plainly imply too openly, too effortlessly, and with no profundity to the closeness. This can be valid for the associations with companions and neighbours and the entire group and in addition with mates. The threat that calls avoidance, which alludes to the inclination to disengage oneself from adoration, kinship, and group, and to build up a specific derision in pay for one's loneliness. I tend to avoid crowds and gathering as I feel suffocate and lonely. However, if I manage to effectively arrange this stage, I will rather convey by myself for whatever is left of my life the righteousness or psycho social quality Erikson calls love. In order to become faithful, I should be ready to let go of my liberty for someone else. Success of this stages, leads to a strong relationships while failure results in exclusiveness and a shallow involvement in the