1966 Words8 Pages

CHAPTER 3
THEORETICAL MODEL
There are numerous models available for isotropic materials bonded adhesively by scarf joints. However fewer models exist for adhesive bonds joining composite materials and most of these are restricted to adhesives which are treated as linearly elastic (Vinnson, 1975). In many practical situations, the adhesive does not behave in a linearly elastic manner.
The objective of this chapter is to develop a theoretical model which can be used to calculate the mechanical properties of laminates repaired by the scarf method. This is achieved by applying the elastic-plastic adhesive analysis techniques developed by Hart-Smith (Hart-Smith, Adhesive-Bonded Scarf and Stepped-Lap Joints, 1973). The approach used is that of continuum*…show more content…*

Equations [6] and [10] yields γ_p^n=(〖(λ〗^n )^2 γ_ef)/2 x^2+r^n x+s^n (plastic region) [11] It is important to mention that in equations [8] and [11], ‘p^n,q^n,r^n,and s^n’ are constants which must be determined from boundary and continuity conditions. 3.1.2 Boundary and continuity conditions It is apparent from figure 3.8 that there are three regions that needs to be defined. These are at the edges (x=0 and x=k), at the transition points (from plastic to elastic) ‘Xp1 and Xp2’ and at the edge of each overlap segment (at x = xi). Hence the boundary and continuity conditions corresponding to equations [8] and [11] are as follows Figure 3.8 Boundary conditions for the in-plane loads in the base laminate and in the repair patch At X=0, the axial load (per unit width) is zero in the base laminate and is equal to the applied load ‘P’ in the repair patch. At x=xk, the axial load is zero in the repair patch and P in the base laminate. N_L^1=0 (at x=0) [12] N_R^1=P (at x=0) [12] N_L^n=P (at x=x_k ) [13] N_R^n=0 (at x=x_k ) [13] Combining equation [5], [12] and [13], the boundary conditions can be re-written

Equations [6] and [10] yields γ_p^n=(〖(λ〗^n )^2 γ_ef)/2 x^2+r^n x+s^n (plastic region) [11] It is important to mention that in equations [8] and [11], ‘p^n,q^n,r^n,and s^n’ are constants which must be determined from boundary and continuity conditions. 3.1.2 Boundary and continuity conditions It is apparent from figure 3.8 that there are three regions that needs to be defined. These are at the edges (x=0 and x=k), at the transition points (from plastic to elastic) ‘Xp1 and Xp2’ and at the edge of each overlap segment (at x = xi). Hence the boundary and continuity conditions corresponding to equations [8] and [11] are as follows Figure 3.8 Boundary conditions for the in-plane loads in the base laminate and in the repair patch At X=0, the axial load (per unit width) is zero in the base laminate and is equal to the applied load ‘P’ in the repair patch. At x=xk, the axial load is zero in the repair patch and P in the base laminate. N_L^1=0 (at x=0) [12] N_R^1=P (at x=0) [12] N_L^n=P (at x=x_k ) [13] N_R^n=0 (at x=x_k ) [13] Combining equation [5], [12] and [13], the boundary conditions can be re-written

Related

## Polyester Fibre Research

1181 Words | 5 PagesTypes and Sizes: The fibres are available in bright, semi-dull and dull lustres. The properties of the fibre may be modified over a range which is limited by the inherent characteristics of the polymer, each manufacturer controlling his process to produce fibres that will meet specific requirements. In general, commercial PET polyester fibres fall into two main classes, a. Regalr tenacity b. High tenacity. PET polyester fibres are produced commonly in round crosssection, but fibres of special cross-section are now available from a number of manufacturers.

## Barium Sulfate Shielding Report

1687 Words | 7 Pages[9] proposed a new expression for the prediction of the continuum intensity (Ik) to take into account the self absorption of Bremsstrahlung for the accurate description of the Bremsstrahlung process ------ (1) Here, ---------- (2) In the present work, it has been evaluated Zmod using Markowicz’s equation (2). The estimated Zmod for BaCl2, BaCO3, BaTiO3, Ba(NO3)2 and BaSO4 are 41.267, 39.116, 37.373, 36.447and 35.077 respectively. The EB cross section for these compounds is evaluated using Lagrange’s interpolation technique, Seltzer-Berger’s [10] theoretical EB cross section data given for elements and the evaluated results of Zmod using the following expression ------- (3) Where lower case z is the atomic number of the element of known EB cross section z adjacent to the modified atomic number (Zmod) of the compound whose EB cross section is desired and upper case Z are atomic numbers of other elements of known EB cross section adjacent to Zmod. Seltzer-Berger’s [10] theoretical EB cross section data is based on Tseng-Pratt theory[11]. The number of EB photons of energy k when all of the incident electron energy T completely absorbed in thick target is given by Bethe and Heitler [12]

## Powder Diffraction Method Analysis

730 Words | 3 PagesIt is not applicable to grains larger than about 0.1 to 0.2 μm, which precludes those observed in most metallographic and ceramographic microstructures.It is important to realize that the Scherrer formula provides a lower bound on the particle size. The reason for this is that a diversity of factors can contribute to the width of a diffraction peak besides influential effects and crystallite size; the most important of these are customarily inhomogeneous strain and crystal lattice imperfections. The following sources of peak broadening are listed in reference[18]. dislocations, stacking faults, twinning, microstresses, grain boundaries, sub-boundaries, coherency strain, chemical heterogeneities, and crystallite smallness. If all of these other contributions to the peak width were zero, then the peak width would be determined solely by the crystallite size and the Scherrer formula would apply.

## Swot Analysis Of Polypropylene

2255 Words | 10 PagesCalculate “i”/angle of impact. Solution: The formula for angle of impact is θ=arcsine (W/L). The width in the triangle is 3m and the length is 16m. Sine i= width / length. Sine i=3m/16m= .1875 Inverse Sine I (.1875)=10.80 the angle of impact is between 10-11° Question 15 Topic: B2 – Analysis of Materials – Fingerprints Question: What is dactylography?

## Case Study: The Leggett-Garg Inequalities

1480 Words | 6 PagesThis observation leads to the clumsiness loophole (see section 2.2). \subsection{Correlation Functions} These assumptions lead to some properties of correlation functions $C_{ij}$, essential for the proof of (\ref{LGI}). Consider firstly their definition: Where $Q_{i}$ is the value of a dichotomous observable measured at time $t_{i}$, and the joint probabilities are obtained repeating the experiment. Postulate 1 provides that Q(t) is a well defined quantity for every time t, even for times different from $t_{i}$ and $t_{j}$. Thus it is possible to define a three-time probability and to obtain $P_{ij}(Q_{i},Q_{j})$ as its marginal, for notation simplicity set $i=1$ and $j=2$.

## Etch Factor Analysis

1023 Words | 5 Pages10.3.3 The Influence of etching parameter on Etch Factor: In order to obtain the effect of etching parameter on etching performance for each different level, the average response of each fixed parameter & level for each etching performance are summed up. Table no. 10.8 shows the total average response & the level of three parameter on Etch factor . The result shows that the optimum etching performance for the Etch factor is obtain at temp. of 600c, Conc.

## Anti-Discrimination In Decision Making

2710 Words | 11 PagesDirect Discrimination Discovery Let r: D, B -> C be a PND classification rule, and let x = conf(D, B -> C) and A be a discriminatory item Elb(x,y)= f(x)/y, f(x)>0 0,f(x)< α equation is used to convert each α-discriminative rule into α-protectiverule. The following inequality is applied for each α-discriminative rule r : A, B->C in α-discriminatory rules collection. Where A is a discriminative item set. conf(r: A, B -> C) < α . conf(⌐A, B -> C) To satisfy above inequality, confidence of α- discriminative rule (A, B->C) has to be decreased to a valueless than confidence of rule ⌐A, B->C, and also the confidence of ⌐A, B->C rule should not be changed ordecreased.

## The Graham-Denning Model

134 Words | 1 PagesThe model is set up based on subject, object, and rules that tie in both. The Graham-Denning model resolves the security questions related to defining a set of specific rights on “how particular subjects can execute security functions on an object.” (Pfleeger & Pfleeger, 2003) The eight access rights include the creation and deletion of object, subject and access rights for read, grant, delete, and transfer. The area that was limiting within this model was associated with the defining a system of protection. This

## Mint Distillate Essay

1875 Words | 8 PagesThe optimum values for field strength, retention time, power of ultrasound and sonication time were equal to 10 kv/cm, 35s, 185.90 w, 4.47 min, respectively. For the values above-mentioned, the number of remaining E. coli was equal to zero. Finally, to verify the optimal point, the independent variables were rounded down the nearest integer to have practical applicability. Accordingly, field strength, retention time, power of ultrasound and horn sonication time were equal to 10 kv/c, 35 s, 200 w and 5 min, respectively. The amount of reducing the number of E. coli in the laboratory was equal to zero, indicating the accuracy of the method of optimization and

## Correlation Analysis: Nt1310 Unit 6 Assignment 1

908 Words | 4 PagesError of Kurtosis .468 .468 The table shows that the in the data set, the GPA variable is a left skewed distribution of -.053 and a left kurtosis of -.811. The final variable indicates that the left skewed distribution stands at -.334 and a left kurtosis of -.334. Section 3: Research Question, Hypotheses, and Alpha level Research Question: Is there a relationship between the performance at the GPA and the final? Null Hypothesis: There is no difference between the GPA performance and the final. On the Asymptomatic significance test, the significance level is 0.05.

### Polyester Fibre Research

1181 Words | 5 Pages### Barium Sulfate Shielding Report

1687 Words | 7 Pages### Powder Diffraction Method Analysis

730 Words | 3 Pages### Swot Analysis Of Polypropylene

2255 Words | 10 Pages### Case Study: The Leggett-Garg Inequalities

1480 Words | 6 Pages### Etch Factor Analysis

1023 Words | 5 Pages### Anti-Discrimination In Decision Making

2710 Words | 11 Pages### The Graham-Denning Model

134 Words | 1 Pages### Mint Distillate Essay

1875 Words | 8 Pages### Correlation Analysis: Nt1310 Unit 6 Assignment 1

908 Words | 4 Pages