Theoretical Moral Theory
The two main aims of a moral theory are a theoretical aim and a practical aim. A theoretical aim refers back to contrasting between an action being right or wrong. Also, can be between a person or something being good or bad. Under the surface of the action or person lies an answer to whether it is right or wrong, or, good or bad. Explanations justify the individual 's opinion on what makes an action right or wrong. To illustrate, one would ask what exactly makes abortion wrong? The action 's moral properties assist in delivering the explanation given. The reasoning that they give serves as moral criteria. The ultimate goal is to understand what makes the action right or wrong in theoretical aim. On the other hand, a practical aim uses a specific method to come to a conclusion on the moral concern. This theory gives guidance toward the ending conclusion if the action is right or wrong. Practical aim is known as a decision procedure. It is mapping out the way to validate the moral verdict if the action is right or wrong or if the person is good or bad by using reliable agents. …show more content…
The concept depends on the moral theory. An action can be all right to perform or all right not to perform, making it morally optional. On the other hand, if an action is only all right to perform and not all right to not preform, it turns into a moral obligation. For instance, in some cultures if a young woman is not married and becomes pregnant, the family is supposed to murder her because in their culture she is now a disgrace to the family. This scenario is a moral obligation. In someone else 's culture cannibalism is an accepted action to preform and is also accepted not to perform making it morally optional. The criteria for the right and the good in a moral theory is one or more moral
Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary
1090 Words | 5 PagesThe hypothetical imperative relies on a desired outcome: "If you want ____, you must do ____". Duty is removed from the hypothetical imperative. Categorical imperative carries far more nuance in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, it takes on three different formulations in the text as moral law. Although these formulations are perhaps simply restating, individually, they provide unique insights into Kant's thinking. In the first formulation, Kant says "Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law" (Kant 421).
Morality In Into Thin Air
475 Words | 2 PagesI have chosen Into Thin Air for my project because the main theme of this novel is Danger and Morality. I feel as there’s danger and morality in my city and around the world, with the natural events occurring. Into Thin Air is a great work of literature because of Krakauer’s use of imagery and symbolism to describe the situation of the mountain. Also, the plot is exciting, and it leaves the reader in shock on each page. The writer tells it as it is.
Antigone Vs Hester Prynne Analysis
304 Words | 2 PagesAntigone Vs Hester Prynne In this play antigone is one of the main characters, she is seen as the play 's “Tragic Heroin”. She is a spoiled brat That wishes she was like her sister Ismene but will not say it. She wishes she was beautiful and could charm men like her sister but instead she scares them. Antigone has a meeting with her sister trying to persuade ismene to help her bury their brother polyneices.
Principle Of Utility And The Formula Of Humanity
1339 Words | 6 PagesAlthough these principles are useful when determining whether it would be morally correct to intervene in a situation, these principles may still conflict with a person’s views of what actions are morally correct or not. The Principle of Utility The Principle of Utility, or
Moral Foundations Theory In Politics
1435 Words | 6 PagesThe 2016 political election has caused great uproar on both the democratic and republican side. Yet, the main focus has been devoted to the actions of the candidates. Meanwhile coverage has been very minimal in terms of the unfortunate events that are to some extent influenced by the actions of these politicians. Recently there have been unfortunate hate expressions and attacks on people of color, in the name of current politicians. Although these events are very concerning, the rest of society seems to view these events as temporary and deem the importance.
Shafer-Landau's Argument Analysis
573 Words | 3 PagesDeveloping from the reasoning of (Russ Shafer-Landau, p.p 13), it is clear that there is a difference between normative ethics and metaethics. Normative ethics are those values that develop from within a personality and are always employed whenever ethics are breached. On the other hand the metaethics is basically the diverse elements that are considered crucial for building positive ethical believes. (Shafer-Landau, p.p 29), also brings forward other moral ethical elements such as the moral error theory, the desire-satisfaction theory, ethical particularism and the doctrine of double effects. All the above elements are crucial for shaping ones ethical perspectives and inclinations leave alone resolving ethical issues within a society.
Sir Gawain And The Catholic Teaching Analysis
1115 Words | 5 PagesSir Gawain and the Catholic Teaching Through our parents and with the help of the church we learn how to choose, and recognize a good or bad action. The church provides us examples through the bible, God’s actions, His intention, and many other ways. However, we are also responsible in shaping or minds to understand and make wise choices. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Sir Gawain from Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, does good actions to save king Arthur through object, intention, and circumstance; he is tempted to sin with the Lord’s wife later on forgetting the morals of human acts during his journey.
Examples Of Non Consequential Ethical Theory
1018 Words | 5 PagesConsequential Ethical theory It is a part of normative ethical theories and it means that the consequence of ones behavior is an ultimate mean for anyone to judge the rightness or wrongness of that behavior. So, from the perspective of a consequentialist an ethically right act is the one that will inherit good outcome or consequence. It usually explains the saying “the end justifies the means” which means that in order to achieve a goal, take any route which leads to achieving it.
Conequential Ethical Theory According To Pozgar: Consequential Ethics Theory
196 Words | 1 PagesOne of the theories I have noticed during the discussion was Consequential ethics theory. According to Pozgar (2013) "Consequential ethical theory revolves around the premise that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends on the consequences or effects of an action" (p. 7). During the discussion, two goals were clearly in conflict- the goal to repopulate the earth and the goal to determine who should get the chance to stay at the station to return to the earth. Pozgar (2013) also states " The goal of consequentiality is to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number" (p. 7). In healthcare ethics committee, this can have its own negative consequences as it undermines individual's right to autonomy.
Thesis On Cannibalism
1152 Words | 5 PagesCannibalism is an issue that can cause us discomfort or even fear when talking about it and it is not unusual since the idea of eat another human being is not something people are used to hearing, which is why I want talk further about this practice because after all there is a reason and a story involved, maybe we do change the way you see this practice. Cannibalism is the practice of eating individuals of the same species. Generally, the term is used to describe the act in which humans eat other humans. The word "cannibalism" carries with it an idea of cruelty disgusts any sensitivity. Beats our imagination like a jungle drum, conjuring nightmares of primal horror, frightening savagery, of maimed and bloody scenes.
Argumentative Essay On Cannibalism
577 Words | 3 PagesAs stated before the average person’s view on cannibalism is one human eating another human; here are some of the different ways to answer the question of topic: what is cannibalism? From a medical point of view cannibalism can be considered “the act of eating the flesh of an animal by another animal of the same species” (Merriam-Webster). Moving to the historians view the definition changes and is pinned to humans. “Cannibalism, or anthropophagy, is the ingestion of human flesh by humans. The concept of cannibalism, its ethical encumbrances, and its cultural expression in history and myth is unquestionably universal” (history today).
Categorical Moral Reasoning
1005 Words | 5 PagesThe two moral reasonings are consequentialist and categorical. Consequentialist means the consequences that will result after whatever you do, whether it is the right or wrong thing to do. Categorical moral reasoning locates morality in certain duties and rights. Somethings are just morally wrong even if it brings good outcomes. According to Mill the principle of utility means realizing a consequence of something before you do it,whether your intentions are good or bad.
Difference Between Utilitarianism And Kantianism
866 Words | 4 PagesMoral theories are theories that help us distinguish between a right or a wrong action. Adequate moral theories help us understand that what we should or shouldn’t do in certain situations. Two of the most famous moral theories are Utilitarianism and Kantianism. According to Utilitarianism, an action is right if only if it out of all the other action gives out the maximum utility. In oppose to that, Kantianism says that an action is right if and only if, in performing that action, the person does not treat anyone as a mean and treats everyone as an end in itself.
Non Consequential Ethics Essay
647 Words | 3 PagesNon Consequential Ethics: A non consequential ethical theory judges the action on the basis of reason, logic, or cause behind that action and not on the basis of consequence or the aftermath of the action. So if your action is based on the best or good intent and purpose, its a moral action and vise versa. This viewpoint depends on the idea of a moral duty,
Ethical Theories Essay
886 Words | 4 Pages• Ethical Theories An ethical theory is a decision model .These theories depicts the viewpoints from which people seek guidance as they make decisions. Each theory highlights different points, different decision making style or a decision rule. Ethical theories are based on individual’s ethical ideology these theories allow a person to find an answer to an issue, to make a morally right decision or to justify a decision.
More about Theoretical Moral Theory
Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals Summary
1090 Words | 5 PagesMorality In Into Thin Air
475 Words | 2 PagesAntigone Vs Hester Prynne Analysis
304 Words | 2 PagesPrinciple Of Utility And The Formula Of Humanity
1339 Words | 6 PagesMoral Foundations Theory In Politics
1435 Words | 6 PagesShafer-Landau's Argument Analysis
573 Words | 3 PagesSir Gawain And The Catholic Teaching Analysis
1115 Words | 5 PagesExamples Of Non Consequential Ethical Theory
1018 Words | 5 PagesConequential Ethical Theory According To Pozgar: Consequential Ethics Theory
196 Words | 1 PagesThesis On Cannibalism
1152 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay On Cannibalism
577 Words | 3 PagesCategorical Moral Reasoning
1005 Words | 5 PagesDifference Between Utilitarianism And Kantianism
866 Words | 4 PagesNon Consequential Ethics Essay
647 Words | 3 PagesEthical Theories Essay
886 Words | 4 Pages