Theoretical Paradigm Relational Maintenance Theory Knapp’s relationship theory describes how relationships develop and last and also how they end. This theory is classified into ten different stages which come under two reciprocal stages; are Knapp’s relationship escalation model and Knapp’s relationship termination model. This explains how a relationship progresses and deteriorates. Varied altered time between each stage can be seen and experienced when a relationship grows or develops. The stages can be even skipped out while the progression or deterioration of a relationship. Mark Knapp (1978) created this stage model on the basic principles of the Social Penetration Theory. Knapp took the basic ideas of breadth and depth and created stages …show more content…
It is important for romantic as well as platonic or same-gender relationships. The model also helps couples or partners understand why there are discrepancies and variations in what each partner is wanting from the relationship. When a person wants to move up a stage in his or her relationship, it probably means that he or she wants to increase or level up positive feelings derived from being with the other person. When one partner wants to move down a stage, it usually means he or she wants to decrease or level down certain negative feelings that come from being involved with the other. The model explaining the relationship progression or advancement has two common phases of development and deterioration (Perlman & Fehr, 1987). Taken together, Knapp’s stages represent the most complete possible progression or advancement of a relationship. Relational Maintenance theory outlined relationship development as a ten step process, broken into two phases. The model consists of ten stages, five that describe “Coming Together” and five describe as “Coming Apart”. According to the Knapp 's model, all of the steps must be done one-at-a-time and in order to make sure they are …show more content…
There are also five stages in coming apart. I. Differentiating – When people develops in a relationship they sometimes end to other external pressures, they will start thinking individually rather than with the partner. They may start developing hobbies or aiming other things. The relationship will start to fade and the deep bond will be broken. The feeling of dislike is often deliberate by the partners on their commitment (Perlman & Fehr, 1987). II. Circumscribing – After differentiating, partners will limit their conversations or interaction and will set up barriers in their communication. They will have their own personal space or boundaries and activities (Perlman & Fehr, 1987). III. Stagnation – The relationship will decline or drop down even more if it reaches the stagnation stage. The communication will be more limited. The only reason the partners don’t separate is due to unavoidable reasons like having children. The relationships in this step will not continue or improve (Perlman & Fehr,
The first main point, says to face the situation head on and not to avoid the person that the conflict is occurring with. The second point conveys the importance of listening. Listening to the other persons concerns may help further develop the relationship onto a more positive one. The third point, emphasises how relationships cannot be fixed straight away, more often than not it takes time to develop relationships and it is important to give the other person time. Relationships Australia focuses on many different aspects of many different types of relationships.
Love isn’t always easy and it doesn’t show any mercy. When Harry met Sally, he had a girlfriend but was moving to New York. He travelled 18 hours with his girlfriend's friend, Sally. And just like that they parted ways. After 12 long years they finally get what they want, a chance at love.
The decline of the relationship occurred when Tom and Summer went to the bar, a guy flirts with Summer and Tom and the guy start a fight. This makes Summer angry, Tom tries to talk to her but she states “"I'm really tired... can we talk about this tomorrow?" Tom want to be more than friends with Summer, but she doesn't want that. Stage 6 is Differentiating, this is when the the closely bonded relationship starts to pull apart because of pressure, different viewpoint and or interest (Knapp’s Relationship Development Model, 2015).
Boundaries should be seen as being statements about who a person is, about what they would like and want. They are about the person and each family member needs to be able to say what they want in regard to physical boundaries and these should be respected. Boundaries are also subject to change as they depend on the feelings of safety that a person has, every person has the right to change their boundaries. The recovering family will need to try out setting, maintaining and changing their boundaries with each other as they will have difficulty knowing how to do
The first stage, “orientation” occurs when people meet for the first time and they reveal general things about themselves. Then, the relationship moves to the second stage called “exploratory affective exchange stage” this is when people start to share more of the personalities. In general, not many people get pass the second stage. The third, is “affective exchange stage” this is reached when people have close friendships or in an intimate relationship. During this stage, people can be more vulnerable to another person without feeling uncomfortable.
In this phase, Person A is now able to comfortably ask and talk about Person B’s values and personal issues, or vice versa. They now are “less constrained” by the rules and norms of communication and are capable of conversing more freely with each other (University of Twente, 2010). The exit stage, however, is the final stage wherein the participants decide whether they want to develop or end the relationship and interaction they have established (World Heritage Encyclopedia,
Their conversations becomes shallow, and what little communication is actually
When tragedy strikes, I’ll momentarily shut down and slip into a place of isolation. This behavior reflects an avoidant relationship style. In short, both avoidant and ambivalent factors contribute to the outcome of a
The article examined the effects of parental divorce on adults’ romantic relationships by conducting a random sample with 464 coupled partners. The authors additionally describe the relationship characteristics most adult
The stages help me to solidify in my mind what might be going on in a person’s life at a given time. His stages fit with what I imagine each age group is grappling with psychologically at each stage. The two theories are alike in that they attempt to explain human behavior, but they approach it from 2 different schools of thinking. The two theories are like in that they both have a social context to them. I believe that both are valid, and both can help to explain why we do what we do.
Divorce is categorized as the greatest threat to marriage since this occurrence is likely to destroy the quality as well as steadiness of families and children globally. Even though the divorce number has rapidly increased in the United States and globally, it is worth noting that the number of married couples and children that are growing up in complete families is also on the rise than when compared to the period of divorce revolution. Cohabitation is one of the underrated marriage threat in the modern society. This is because most individuals live together not just because they are a part of each other but mainly because they are focused on reducing their life struggles as well as raising their children (Evans,
For example, this situation might look like the guy quitting what he’s doing and following his dreams of becoming a musician. The second stage which is circumscribing is an indicator of the couple slowly but surely growing apart. In this situation, both the girl and the guy avoid conversation about serious things and instead their conversations go from deep to the superficial conversations. The third part of the coming apart model is stagnation. The couple doesn’t communicate at all.
According to this theory, nature of love is changing fundamentally and it can create either opportunities for democracy or chaos in life (Beck & Beck- Gernsheim, 1995). Love, family and personal freedom are three key elements in this theory. This theory states that the guidelines, rules and traditions which used to rule personal relationships have changed. “Individuals are now confronted with an endless series of choices as part of constructing, adjusting, improving or dissolving the unions they form with others” (Giddens, 2006). For instance, marriage nowadays depends on the willingness of the couples rather than for economic purposes or the urge to form family.
Effective relationships should be a common goal for all to strive for. The learner believes that there are four major signs that make us human; the need to love, the need to be loved, the need to be accepted and the need to be respected as an individual. None of these things can be accomplished alone, therefore, a relationship needs to be formed. The more effective the relationship the more these needs are able to be met. In the study of marriage and family we look into the areas that can either make or break relationships.