ipl-logo

Theoretical Perspectives In IPE

812 Words4 Pages

1. Discuss and analyze the main theoretical perspective in IPE. There are three main theories in IPE namely liberalism, realism, and structuralism. Liberalism promotes cooperation and peaceful co-existence among states. In IPE, liberalism promotes trade, diplomatic relations among states that promotes the national interest of the country. Realism is about acquiring power and security. Realist believes that the state is the main actor in the international politics, the nature of state’s market is competitive, and states have direct relationship to another state in pursuit of political power and economic wealth. Last is Structuralism, according to Karl Marx there is a “constant struggle between classes” which is bourgeoisie and proletariat. In …show more content…

We can see in the news that there are different summits that are held that promotes international cooperation to have harmony among states. Also in summits, most of the issues being raised were the issue that affects the whole world like environmental problems, disputes among states, the threat of terrorism, and issues in human rights. In conclusion, I think that the liberalist ideology is declining somehow because of the threat of terrorism and climate change. The issue of territorial disputes among states like what is happening between our country, the Philippines and China. I think that the states are slowly shifting again into realist ideology because of what is happening, even though United States can still handle the issues of the world, they themselves cannot settle the issues that can affect their economic ties. The hegemon can only impose economic sanction to a state that violates the international law. 2. Why do Mercantilist believe that the international economy is a source of conflict rather than …show more content…

They are also tempted to exploit other resources just to earn more and stay in power. Developing countries are most of the time victims of the actions of those developed countries. They will make ally with a country in which they think they can get more resources and in return they will pay them. It creates conflict because in mercantilist view, countries want to gain more and compete to each other to stay in power and to secure the states rather than

Show More
Related

  • Cold War Dbq Essay

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    Secretary of State George Marshall gave a speech explaining a plan for European recovery which known today as The Marshall Plan. It states that if the United States does not do whatever it takes to help restore normal economic health to the world, “there can be no political stability or peace.” (Document

    Read More

  • Independence Day Film Analysis

    1335 Words  | 6 Pages

    From these, liberal ideals are portrayed to have two main strands with one founded on liberal nationalism while the other on liberal internationalism (Reitan 43). The rational foreign policy approach that that elite policy-makers can consider when confronted with an international hurdle would be similar to the approach adopted in the film. By first securing themselves, the focus is first given to the maintenance of the national sovereignty and the security of liberal institutions at home. In that case, foreign policy should begin with liberal nationalism. Such was evident in the movie as the United States began by securing itself (Reitan 43).

    Read More

  • Star Trek Balance Of Terror Analysis

    989 Words  | 4 Pages

    Interestingly, Captain Kirk displayed examples of liberalism and realism simultaneously. It is these actions of the two warring enemies in which the conflict begins and appropriately ends. To move on, the theories of realism and liberalism must be expounded upon. Realism, as a theory, deals with how the world is perceived, and it predominantly focuses on the true nature of man. The state of the world is anarchy according to this theory.

    Read More

  • The Liberal Internationalism: The Invasion Of Iraq

    1446 Words  | 6 Pages

    The first Liberal Internationalists, including Wilson, were a very ethnocentric, non diverse group. They had two driving questions that they wanted to have answered from their new ideology. Those questions were, how do we prevent war, and what causes war? When analyzing these questions, liberal internationalists focused on both the domestic and international level. When examined at the domestic level, Liberal Internationalists concluded that illiberal, nondemocratic regimes are to blame for wars, and the only way to prevent wars was by allowing nations self determination through democracy.

    Read More

  • Realist Approach To Military Security

    2260 Words  | 10 Pages

    Looking back over the development of the Security Studies field, there can be no doubt that the realist tradition has exercised enormous influence. Even the harshest of critics can acknowledge that with their focus on power, fear, and anarchy, realist theories have provided centrally important explanations for conflict and war (Williams, 2013). One interpretation of realism that is unbroken amongst most commentators of the theory is that realists are individuals that believe the State is the principle actor in international politics and that they are very concerned with the balance of power (Marsalis, 2013). They argue that all the State’s actions and choices are a reflection of the collective will of the people, which is also an argument

    Read More

  • Realism Vs. Liberalism In International Relations

    902 Words  | 4 Pages

    The theory unleashes such dynamic forces that from the time of its inception up till now it has governed the international system of the world however things one day itself fall apart. The Realists mark the State as the locus of different international circles and these sovereign states have vested interests which are always selfish. Realism is a heartless theory, man is not supposed to be selfish in the way exaggerated by the Realist thinker however [he] is a seeker of knowledge and what so ever he stumbles upon, he keeps

    Read More

  • Macbeth's Greed Analysis

    1113 Words  | 5 Pages

    Greed for power leads corrupt leaders to pursue power through ruthless and violent ways, putting their countries in an unstable state. Macbeth commits murders and violent acts to earn his absolute power, but his corrupt mindset of yearning power leads to instability in the Scotland. After hearing from the witches, Macbeth admits that, “My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical/ Shakes so my single state of man/ That function is smother'd in surmise /and nothing is but what is not.”

    Read More

  • Realism, Constructivism And Post-Structuralism

    958 Words  | 4 Pages

    4.0 An Explanation of Realism, Liberalism, Constructivism and Post-Structuralism. 4.1 Realism Realism or political realism prioritizes national interests and security concerns in addition to moral ideology and social reconstruction. The term is often associated with political power. The term is often associated with political power. Realism believes that the state is the main actor of the most important in determining the direction of a country.

    Read More

  • Realism And Idealism In International Relations

    897 Words  | 4 Pages

    Idealists see realism as a set of assumptions about how and why states behave like they do, rather than a theory of foreign relations. They strongly criticise the realist thesis that the struggle for power and security is natural. They reject such a fatalistic orientation claiming that power is not natural, and simply a temporary phase of human history. They believe that by adhering completely and consciously to moral values moral values in behaviour, power struggle and war can be eliminated.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Realism And Liberalism

    1938 Words  | 8 Pages

    The current work is meant to explain the differences and similarities between the most dominant theories in international relations, Realism and Liberalism, both theories have some similarities and differences but much more important and interesting is to discuss and explain what differs and makes similar both theories. Conflicts and wars, Similarities and differences between Realism and Liberalism: Both Liberalism and Realism believes that there is no world government that can prevent countries to go to war on one another. For both theories military power is important and both Realism and Liberalism can understand that countries can use military power to get what they need or want. Also, both theories are conscious that without military

    Read More

  • Waltz's Theory Of Neorealism

    1036 Words  | 5 Pages

    Instead Waltz sets out to prove his international relations theory in a scientific manner, while choosing to ignore the normative concerns of classical and neoclassical realism (Jackson and Sørensen, 2003: 84). The theory of neorealism – or structural realism – focuses on structures (and on the interacting units, the constants and the changes of the system) as the determinative powers within the scope of international relations (main principle of those being that of anarchy). Jackson and Sørensen (2003: 84) also point out that actors are viewed

    Read More

  • Difference Between Classical And Classical Realism

    795 Words  | 4 Pages

    Classical realism and structural realism are both theories of International Relations, therefore huge differences are noticed in between those two. The main difference lies in the motivation to power, which is seen differently by both theories. Classical realism is concentrated in the desire of power- influence, control and dominance as basic to human nature. Whereas, structural realism is focused on the international system anarchic structure and how the great powers behave. Classical realists believe that power is related to human nature, thus their analysis of individuals and states is similar.

    Read More

  • The Theory Of Idealism In International Relations

    1253 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Theory of Idealism in International Relations. Ojochogwu Aladi Enape Schiller International University. The theories in International relations are assertions that try to explain and justify how international structures work and the characteristics of ever changing interactions across territories.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Realism And Idealism

    1381 Words  | 6 Pages

    The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous with the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists, however, expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact, both they must be viewed as actors.

    Read More

  • Marxism In International Organizations

    945 Words  | 4 Pages

    Brad Conley Prof. Greg Young IAFS 1000-1004 Though the international system today shares many aspects of realism, neoliberalism, constructivism, and marxism, neoliberalism is the predominant principles under which the international system operates. With the formation of several influential international governmental organizations (IGOs), the world has become a much safer place. Though neoliberal ideas draw from realism in the fact that the international system is in anarchy, neoliberalism dictates that the world is in a form of structured anarchy, perpetuated by the IGOs that governments partake in. By strengthening webs of interdependence, countries find the ability to interact amicably, and build up reliance upon one another. As countries

    Read More

More about Theoretical Perspectives In IPE

Open Document