2.2.4 Theories
A large number of studies on aid effectiveness exists and continues to emerge as the topic is by no means a new one. These studies have presented strong contradictions over the years but serve as an important step in clarifying the issue on aid effectiveness. The literature on aid-growth linkages started during the 1960s with the rising question of whether aid works is it beneficial and under what conditions is aid expected to be beneficial. “There are some periods when assessing aid effectiveness becomes particularly intensive which coincide with cycles of doubt on the efficacy of aid as an instrument of foreign development” (Kanbur, 2003, p 15).
The most influential work along these lines is the one by Burnside and Dollar
…show more content…
However, some evidence that aid has had positive effects when the policy environment has been conducive to growth. Regarding the relationships between aid and the main channels through which its impact on growth could flow - investment and domestic saving – the evidence is mixed, with some indication that aid has had a positive impact where adjustment efforts have been sustained. In a World Bank (1998) study that sorted 56 aid receiving countries by the quality of their economic management, it was found that those with good policies (low inflation, a budget surplus and openness to trade) and good institutions (little corruption, strong rule of law, effective bureaucracy) benefited from the aid they received. Those with poor policies and institutions did not. (Aryeetey, …show more content…
Whether elite exists or not is yet to be proven, however, Boone (1996) and Adam and O.Connell (1999) used a similar theoretical framework to show that an "elitist" political regime will waste foreign aid, meaning that it will allocate aid to consumption instead of investment. In the models of Svensson (2000) and Economides et al. (2004), vaguer outcomes are present where the rent-seeking behavior of parts of the population increases when the amount of funds that can be appropriated is enlarged by aid funds. This shifts meaningful resources away from productive use and is likely to result in a net loss for the
Groups and individuals with that hold these resources use them to maintain power and social control. The wealthy are the independent variables that hold the power to make decisions and control how society is ran. The lower classes are the dependent variables that have little to no control over how society is structured. Conflict theorists encourage social change. Instead of allowing the “well off” to force social order on everyone else, the general public should fight for social change even at the expense of a possible social revolution.
Wealth has formed an enormous gap in the society. As a country, the people are as separated as oil and water. “The wealthy class is becoming more wealthy; but the poorer class is becoming more dependent. Social contrasts are becoming sharper” (Doc A), to distinguish the poor from the rich has become extremely effortless.
Is the author 's argument based on any unproven assumptions? If so, identify the assumptions and identify what information is needed. The author 's arguments are based on unproven assumptions. For instance, he assumes that, it is false that material wealth is the standard of success and this goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit.
Kaitlyn Johnson English, 008 September 29, 2015 Inequality Inequality has been a major problem all over the world. Not just with race or gender, but now ones' income puts them aside from others. and they are catorgarized. Gary S. Becker, a Noble laurete in economics, and Kevin M. Murphy, a professor at the University of Chicago and a recipient of a 2005 MacCrthur "genius" fellowship, believe that a higher education equals higher income. Paul Krugmam, a teacher of economics at Princeton and the city University of New York, uses people who have had an impact on America.
(Voegeli 8). The similarities between how wealth and democracy imprison men ultimately expresses that the path to these two ideologies leads men to isolation from society. The obsessive following of the American dream, democracy, and the path towards prosperity ultimately takes a vicious toll on the follower’s connection to society. According to Close, wealthy people isolate themselves because “acquiring more money predisposes people toward keeping their distance.” These conclusions, which Close discusses in her article “This is Why Rich People Aren’t Always Happy”, add weight to the argument that rich people detach themselves from other members of society.
Currently, we have both a wealthy class and common people rule. Everyone (common people) gets to vote, and those votes decide our future. But, because of their wealthy, the wealthy have an advantage when it comes to politics. They can pay a lot for the best lawyer (the best example being the OJ Simpson case) and be proven innocent because the lawyer raised reasonable doubt. Also, wealthy business owners could get the government to move a smaller business/store, using eminent domain, and place their own business at the location, using the words “public use” to tell the people it was for them.
The issue surrounding the wealthy class and their abundance of money is one that has been prominent for a long time. For many, the seemingly endless fortune these elite class people sit on has been deemed to be unfair and unnecessary, especially when there are people around the world who are not making enough money to obtain basic necessities. Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics, believes that the solution to this monetary problem is for the wealthy to simply donate money they don’t use on basic necessities back to the people in need. Although giving back to the less fortunate could potentially help in fixing many problems, prosperous people should not be obligated to donate money they “don’t need” to various organizations because since
However, this is not true it can be seen all over different part of the united states where wealthy suburbs are built where poverty is just help the city. The idea of trickle down economics is that by doing this it will help motivate the people to something or try harder. The fact is that in some way that is the best that some people can do and that just the truth. Beverly 3 In Laura’s family case being wealthy is a sign of stature and appetence which be one of the treason why the party did not stop.
This theory was conceptualized by C. Wright Mills in 1948-1962 (Ralph Dahrendorf, Lewis Coser, and others also advocated this theory) as he was criticizing
In this article, Tom Mckay examines how the United States has turned into an Oligarchy. One of the interesting arguments he makes is the average citizen doesn’t have significant impact on public policy and most power has come from the upper class. Figure 2 shows that the income gains for the top 1% has increase over 100% compared to the rest. The data seems to support the idea that with the top earners becoming more wealthy, that as means they are having more power. The author suggests that as the business and corporations are getting bigger and wealthier, they will essentially make all of the decision.
Over the last few decades, the United States Congress has debated numerous campaign finance reforms. Debated proposals have included limiting independent expenditures, raising limits on individual contributions, banning all private campaign contributions, and creating a public financing campaign system. In many of the debates, compelling arguments exist for both the proponents and the opponents. Generally, arguments are predicated upon constitutional concepts, Supreme Court rulings, standard policy, logic and reason, and personal perspectives.
The elites are responsible for all societal inequalities. There is a major power struggle
They also attempted to shape thinking, to make acceptable difference in income that would otherwise be odious”(395). In economic and political fields, people who are in charge take advantage of the authority, in other words, the dominance to consolidate and bolster their superiority. They influence (or manipulate, to some extent) the public’s thoughts and convey the idea that the difference in income is reasonable and justifiable to the public. Both Ho and Stiglitz mention people’s desire to maintain and strengthen the status.
It refers to a situation in which the divisions and relationships of social inequality have solidified into a system that determines who gets what, when, and why” (Little et al, 2014, Chapter 9). Throughout The Trouble With Billionaires, a dialogue of the US and Canadian governments helping to pad the wallets of the top 1 percent at a cost to everyone else is given. Many examples of governments (mostly in the US) institutionalizing the
The upper class get better food and products than the working class that is actually helping the country grow. The upper class controls what is given to the lower class and even cuts down on what or how much the lower classes get, “It appeared that