ipl-logo

Theories Of Criminal Behavior

1331 Words6 Pages

Theories help answer two very important questions; how and why. The purpose of a theory is to explain how and why certain things and/or events are connected to other things and/or events. Everything done in the criminal justice field is based on theory. In criminology, theories answer questions about criminal behavior that would have otherwise not been answered. Theories give clues to how and why people commit criminal acts. By providing the motives behind criminal activity, theories give criminologists a better understanding of crime (Bohm & Vogel, 2015). Theories of criminal behavior can relate to human nature, biological issues, psychological issues, sociological issues, economic issues, or a collaboration of two or more of these factors. …show more content…

All theories share one thing in common; they rely a lot on philosophical assumptions. Philosophical assumptions are ideas that cannot be tested empirically or scientifically. This means that they cannot be proved or disproved. Instead, philosophical assumptions give philosophical insight on criminal behavior (Bohm & Vogel, 2015). Philosophical Assumptions are especially important because scientific research rarely offers conclusive results in regards to which theory should be used in a particular case. Philosophical assumptions are a driving force in whether a person accepts or rejects a theory. To better understand the role philosophical assumptions play in understanding criminal behavior, one must be aware of the different types of philosophical assumptions (Bohm & Vogel, 2015).
One of the major philosophical assumptions seen in all theories is ethical assumptions. Ethical assumptions, also known as normative implications, give insight on what is right and wrong, good, and bad, and what should be done in situations. Thus, criminal theories contain certain value judgments and policy implications. Value judgments evaluate the behavior, while policy implications describe a solution or what should be done in a particular situation (Bohm & Vogel, …show more content…

Unlike philosophical assumptions, scientific theories can be tested scientifically or empirically. Scientific theories are tested through the process of verification and falsification. Verification occurs through observation and is the confirmation of proposition. Falsification also involves observation. However, falsification involves disproving a proposition. Most scientists believe that falsification is more powerful than verification. This has been widely accepted because is impossible to prove that a theory is true since there is always a possibility that the relationship that has been observed may play a role in some unconsidered factor. However, theories can be proven as false (Bohm & Vogel,

Show More
Related

  • Psychological Theories: The Correlation Between Socialization And Crime

    873 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are several psychological theories that have been applied to criminal activity. These theories are believed to impact moral growth and personality ailments in relation to crime. White-collar crimes and strain theory which is a social structure theory as well as hackers and learning theories which is a social process theory are discussed. Social structure theory states that poor individuals are the ones that commit crimes over middle and rich individuals. Criminals who do not have an equal opportunity are strained and will more likely to be involved in crime states the strain theory.

    Read More

  • Comparing The Sociological And Psychological Theories Of Criminology

    417 Words  | 2 Pages

    Theological theories discuss things such as God and Demons and how they have an influence on criminal behavior. Each theory takes a completely different stance and viewpoint. They each offer their own unique theories in

    Read More

  • Ted Bundy: The Deterrence Theory

    1982 Words  | 8 Pages

    A theory is merely an explanation for life’s occurrences. They can be extensive, looping through idea after idea, or simply require a few sentences. Either way, theories are the starting point to the question, “Why?” In regards to criminology, we base our codes of law and by extension, our behavior, on these theories. One of the most prominent of which is the deterrence theory.

    Read More

  • Evan Kneezer's Theory

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    The demarcation criteria are the set of requirements that determine whether or not a theory is considered scientific. Just as the theory can only be accepted using the current employed methods, the theory must also comply with the current explication of the demarcation criteria, which is that the theory must explain the generally known facts of its domain and be fundamentally falsifiable. This latter is explained using the concept of confirmation and disconfirmation reasoning, which in both cases, bases its predictions on theories. With that, in confirmation reasoning, when the prediction is proven to be correct, the theory is thus correct. Disconfirmation reasoning is when the prediction turns out to be wrong, then that is evidence against that theory.

    Read More

  • Greyhound Bus Beheading Theory

    1058 Words  | 5 Pages

    The classical theory of crime says that people make rational choices when they commit crimes. “Individuals have the will and rationality to act according to their own will and desires. Individuals will calculate the rationality of the crime based on the benefits of the crime versus the consequences of the crime” (Robinson, 2014). This theory discuses that how people think about the negative and positive outcomes before they commit crime. Even though they realize it is not right, they still continue to commit illegal offence because they believe that what they are doing is for the greater

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory Research Paper

    1027 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the criminal justice system, perhaps one of the most well-known are deterrence and labeling theory. It is clear that these theories contradict the positions of effects on formal punishment in the US justice system. Which one most accurately represents the effect of legal punishment? I would argue that the constant shift of politics and legislation change the effects of legal punishment from these theories. Deterrence works better in some neighborhoods rather than others based on what people actually view is deviant.

    Read More

  • What Is A Rational Choice Theory Of Crime

    74 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are loads of theories on crime and why people commit them. If I had to pick a favorite one I would pick rational choice theory. Rational choice theory definition is the view that people behave as they do because they believe that performing their chosen actions has more benefits and less costly than living a legal life. That is, people make rational choices based on their goals, and those choices govern their behavior.

    Read More

  • Theories Of Criminology Theory

    1457 Words  | 6 Pages

    According to this theory, the people focus on making logical choice regarding the circumstances in which to commit crime. It is noticed that this theory makes use of utilitarian belief under which man is the actor who considers costs, means,

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice Theory

    1288 Words  | 6 Pages

    The theory of criminal justice This theory states that criminal procedures are part and branch of philosophy that focuses on punish those who break the law. There is a strong correlation between criminal procedures and the philosophy of law as well as the morals and ethical standards of society. Criminal law theorists put more emphases on offenses that can be seen as illegal and that warrant criminalization of the activities or events. Thus, most of these theorists believe that there is the need to punish the lawbreakers to set an example to other individuals who may have intentions of following their suit or engaging in legal activities.

    Read More

  • Popper's Demarcation: A Theoretical Analysis

    448 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, the issue with this is explanations for why something is false may be looked over, Dunhem problem within physics as it is impossible to test a hypothesis in isolation as many factors are controlled and there is always auxiliary hypothesises to the one that is being tested the bold conjecture. Thus falsifying a theory in this way can lead to inaccurate conclusion of the bold

    Read More

  • Flaws Of The Scientific Method

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    However even theories that have not been proven “facts” by validity testing can still prove to be useful tools in the scope of science. Beach states over the past two centuries science has helped our world in so many ways from new technology and theories to improving the overall well being of societies showing the benefits that science can provide (ch 6, para. 47). We use science in everything and in everyday life, as Beach states it is the best method to create the truth and something we can actually depend

    Read More

  • Popper's Theory Of Scientific Progress Essay

    1245 Words  | 5 Pages

    Karl Popper was a twentieth-century philosopher that had a dissatisfaction with the definition of what could be considered a “science.” The claim of falsification, being able to equally be observed false, made Popper’s argument of demarcation appealing to those with the same inquiries about the method of scientific progress. Popper said to be defined as a real science, one needs to make risky, bold predictions that could easily be refuted by observation. I will argue that the construction of Popper’s scientific progress is flawed due to the refutations of infinite hypotheses and observational unreliability.

    Read More

  • Popper's Theoretical Analysis

    1400 Words  | 6 Pages

    A theory could only be falsifiable or non-falsifiable and falsified or non-falsified. There is no scientific reason to prefer a unfalsified tested theory above another untested theory. There does not exist “more likely to be true”, it can only be falsified or non-falsified. A theory that has never been tested at all is just as non-falsified as a theory that has been tested many times. Popper does not allow us to prefer one non-falsified theory above another on scientific ground which causes

    Read More

  • Differences Between Science And Pseudoscience

    1410 Words  | 6 Pages

    A number of basic standards for determining a body of knowledge, methodology, or practice are widely agreed upon by scientists. One of the basic notion is that all experimental results should be reproducible, and able to be verified by other individuals.[13] This standard aim to ensure experiments can be measurably reproduced under the same conditions, allowing further investigation to characterize whether a hypothesis or theory related to given phenomena is valid and reliable. Philosopher Karl Popper (?) in one of his project attempted to draw the line between science and pseudo-science.

    Read More

  • Positivism Vs Interpretivism

    1368 Words  | 6 Pages

    This confirms that science commences with a problem and observation is used to falsify theories. These two theories, however, can be said to be commensurable because they have the same foundation which is epistemology and ontology, believing that observation yields empirical

    Read More

More about Theories Of Criminal Behavior

Open Document