Theories Of Differential Association Theory

Crime and deviance are a greatly discussed topic in the world of sociology. There are numerous theories of why people break laws and violate social norms. While all of them have a way of explaining the possible reasoning behind it, I think that conflict theory does the best job of helping us understand the concepts of why deviance and crime happen. Their beliefs that the most powerful in our society define what is deviant, the reasons that crime is functional and dysfunctional and its idea of strain theory are the most useful in explaining crime and deviance. Functionalist believe that the most powerful in our society are responsible for defining what is deviant or a crime.

The objective of criminological theories is to help one gain an understating of crime and criminal justice. Speculations cover the making and the infringing upon of the law, criminal and degenerate conduct, and additionally examples of criminal movement All of the listed theories play an important role regarding the reason why Aaron Hernandez committed the

Compare and contrast modeling theory with attachment theory. How do each of these perspectives explain aggressive and/or criminal behavior? Which of these two explanations do you find more compelling? Justify your selection.

To begin with, criminologist work with several reasons, concepts and theories that include several surveys or researches. These methods imply in several cases such as serial killers, sexual assaults and crimes in general. In Paul Bernardo’s case, a serial killer/rapist would be useful as an example that criminologist could use towards using different concepts and theories such as the attachment theory. Criminologists who study this theories, well know a right nor wrong theory exist, in contrast, whichever fits and it’s been well researched becomes considered to be useful. The attachment theory accommodates to figure out the how and why Paul Bernardo committed those crimes.

It normally stems from conflict as a child. Merging theories together helps to get more detailed data and better understand the reason behind human actions. Combining theories help to adequately assess an offender's reasoning for committing crimes as well as identifies ways to prevent them from committing additional crimes. Many factors overlap to create delinquent behavior, so combining research and theories is not only a good way of identifying control variables, but also a good way to extinguish

We learn from the things we experience, the things we see, and the people with whom we associate. We learn from our surroundings , experiences, acquaintances, friends, and family. Contends that we learn aggression like any other behaviour-by watching others and imitating their behaviour” (2014). This theory explains that people act and do illegal things because that is all they have been taught. Those in gangs who may use violence to resolve conflict and/or establish a respectable name for themselves have been surrounded with those who do the same thing.

A theory is a set of statements or principles developed to explain a group of facts or phenomena. It has been repeatedly tested and used to make predictions. Theories in this category attempt to explain why an individual commits a crime or delinquent behaviors. The primary goal of criminological theory is to help one gain an understating of why and how certain things are related to criminal behavior (Bohm and Vogel, 2011). Theories dissect the making and the breaking of the law, criminal different behavior, as well as patterns of criminal activity.

2. In criminological/sociological study, what are some of the limitations to defining “crime” as only those actions in violation of criminal law? Do you feel that criminologists should limit their study in this way? Support your response. Crime is learned from a person’s interaction within a given society.

If the youth of today wants to break the law; then they should be required to take whatever punishment they deserve, and be tried as adults. They are mature enough to know what’s relatively right and wrong. I think that partially the Act is promoting youth to commit crimes without having the slightest fear of consequences since there are no harsh sentences. Personally I think that if I were to commit a crime, I would be “we should be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime” – tony Blair (PICTUREQUOTES.com) Overall, the YCJA gives youth several opportunities for rehabilitation but there should be a little more to the consequences.

Classical Criinology- This means that in the Eighteenth century, the social thinkers strongly believed that a criminal who chooses to commit a crime and how this type of behavior can be controlled by judicious type of punishment. Offense-specific crime- This term means that a criminal will react to the characteristics of a certain crime. Offender-specific crime-

While I find both views on punishment convincing and effective in different ways, I believe that the reductivist approach to punishment is and will be the most effective to decrease levels of crime in society. People with alcohol, drug and mental health issues should be rehabilitated and should be taught right from wrong while in incapacitation, to protect the public from the particular offender until they do reform. While retributivism focuses on harming offenders to ‘teach them a lesson’, it will never have a positive effect as they are then taught a lesson by more violence which doesn’t resolve the crime they have committed. If offenders pay their time in prison and get support through treatments and programs provided by prisons, they can come back into society viewing the world in a different way. I also believe that with the support given to offenders who need that help, there will be considerate decreases of crime as criminals need specialist help to overcome the problems they have, as the reasons they have committed crimes such as robbery, theft, drug dealing, will be because of these problems and has a knock on effect to them becoming criminals.

According to Turvey, nomothetic offender profiles best describe the characteriaztion of an offender by utilizing a pool of study groups of specific offenders in specific crimes. So, when utilizing nomothetic profiling it 's difficult for the representation actual offenders that are actually out in the society. Instead, nomotheic profiling methods are developed for a representation various theories and hypothetical to build scientific methodology for profiling. To elaborate, nomothetic profiles are just hypothetical.

This quote talks about the number one way court systems chose to handle delinquents, which one can use to describe the juvenile court system and its punishments. One can also correlate this quote with the other one above, which talks about how juvenile systems work primarily with the idea of family. This quote enables one to prove that jail time only makes a child more likely to turn to criminal activities. Thus, allowing for one to prove a rebuttal wrong in saying prison teaches a child a lesson, which needs to learned and corrected. When in reality, adult prisons teach a child how to commit more crimes by turning their backs against the court systems.

Crime is the rupture of guidelines or laws for which exactly legislating power could eventually prescribe a conviction. Singular human culture may each characterize crime and violations in an unexpected way. Crime has been consistent in the historical backdrop of humanity and is an unavoidable wonder influencing all social orders. The Social scientist is doing much examine in the investigation of crime, Including such points as the part of police misleading dealing in cross-examination and jurors perceptions by using different techniques. Comparing the links between personal Exploitation and dread of crime; police viability and crime rates, and adolescent guilty parties tried in adult criminal court (Hasselm, 2011).

According to the English dictionary a ‘reference group’ refers to a group with which an individual identifies and whose values the individual accepts as guiding principles. Reference groups are used in order to calculate and regulate the features of an individual or other group's characteristics and sociological attributes. Reference groups provide the criterion and differentiation needed for comparison and interpretation of group and personal characteristics. Robert K. Merton hypothesized that individuals compare themselves with reference groups of people who engage the social role to which the individual desires. ‘Reference groups are groups that people refer to when evaluating their [own] qualities, circumstances, attitudes, values