Theories of Group Communication The two theories that hold utmost importance in group communication are: (1) Functional Perspective on Group Decision Making by Randy Hirokawa & Dennis Gouran and (2) Adaptive Structuration Theory of Marshall Scott Poole. The first one i.e. Functional Perspective on Group Decision Making disagrees with the conventional perspective of too many cooks spoiling the broth. Instead it suggests that in a group, the members cares about the issue, are reasonably intelligent and face a challenging task that calls for more facts, new ideas and clear thinking. Hirokawa and Gouran are convinced that group interaction has a positive impact on the final decision and the quality of solutions is tremendous. Here, the functional …show more content…
A lot of time people in groups build up structures or arrangements that are very uncomfortable for them but they don’t realize what they’re doing. The point of Structuration Theory is to make them aware of the rules and resources that they’re using so that they can have more control over what they do in groups. For a long time, scholars generally agreed with the single sequence model and the actual phases that groups go through i.e Orientation, Conflict, Coalscence, Development and Integration. Another researcher, Anthony Giddens gave the theory of structuration which is a social theory of the creation and reproduction of social system that is based on the analysis of both structure and agents, without giving primacy to either. Here, the Adaptive Structuration theory has focused on group process, members’ use of rules and resources in interaction. Poole is also interested in group products- that which is produced and reproduced through the interaction. Here, decision making group produce decision an after everyone in the group agrees, you then decide that the members works after selecting their work. Continuing with the example of Idea Generation Workshop, there, the decision making groups first chose the brand. Then, members, after agreeing to it started working on their specific area that were coming up with a brand name, tagline, campaign posters and advertisements and brand logo. Here all the members acted as agents between the brand and the consumers and in turn facilitated brand
Degrouping and regrouping are operated supported by social construction because that is how people create their reality. It all depends on their situation and how it is handled. Social construction is the ways in which people create their perceived reality, and it has different components which are issue, language, system of stratification and social reference. Issue is the topic of the situation, for example in one scene of the film Salt of the Earth the
All members of the groups were on different levels of acceptance with who they are as a person and the process expectations. Although members on different levels and stages of steps, they all had the same commitment goal. They all accept who they are because prior to members speaking the have to state their names and admit their problems. For any member of the group to be able to handle the changes in their group, they must some knowledge about their group leading
Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.
In The Dangers of Groupthink, Naomi Karten provides the reader with a few of many examples on how they can avoid the dangerous phenomenon that is, Groupthink. Karten expresses her opinion by stating, “Diligently avoid a no-criticism culture and a no-criticism decision-making policy.” (The Danger of Groupthink, 2). Being able to avoid a nonconstructive environment is an extremely courageous step that can ultimately lead to one’s success. However, for one to achieve such a large task takes a tremendous effort, and requires one to place both their feelings and well being on the line.
Moreover, they need to enhance their capacity and expanding their relation because knowledge have been varying and unique to be operated for the group purpose (Martin & Mirraboopa,
In a group communication context Tuckman theorised and established the “Developmental sequence in small groups” in 1965. His theory on group communication, educates us on how people work together through 5 stages. Forming, Storming, Norming, Preforming and Adjourning. Forming is the first stage; and is at the very beginning of group interaction with one another, participants tend to behave independently and although willingness to communicate and get on.
Communication 8 focuses on group communication regardless of whether it is a large or small group. It should help us understand what really is communication and how it should be used properly. Overall we will be able to solve problems, deliberate and reach decisions as a group. As a group we will come together to complete any material that has to be done properly. I believe that I will learn how to solve problems, learn what it takes to communicate with others, and be able to better understand others.
Decision-making The work team often seeks to be compliant and consensual in the decision-making process. While the team is often used to the goal of being consistent and consistent, excessive emphasis on consensual behavior can also lead to an optimal decision. Perhaps, the most famous example is the "groupthink", when too much emphasis on group consensus, can produce "groupthink", for fear of failure group cohesion and failed to discuss important alternatives (Janis, 1972). The diversity of the team can often be solved by introducing a different perspective.
Kurt Lewin’s major contribution lies in the field of Group Dynamics, Field Theory and Action Research. He modelled the social change process in organisational, particularly, industrial setups. 1. Group Dynamics: - Lewin’s definition of a group is widely accepted. Here the basic line of argument is that groups come into being in a psychological sense ‘not because their members necessarily are similar to one another (although they may be); rather, a group exists when people in it realize their fate depends on the fate of the group as a whole’
Introduction Before I joined this class I have less idea about the group dynamic what is means, and what will do. In general, I was think group dynamics is interesting and will improve our self and it is important of future. Know after I finish this subject , the group dynamics was actually interesting subject . It helps me to improve myself to be better because every member want to work together to achieve for our goals. So I know there are many skills that must everyone have it.
Brands are complex offerings that are conceived by organisations but ultimately resides in the consumers mind (De Chernatony, 2010). A brand thus signals to the customers the source of the products and services and protects both the competitor who would attempt to provide products and services that appear similar or identical (Aaker, 2004). Brands provides the basis upon which consumer can identify and bond with a product or service or group of products and services (Weilbacher, 1995). A brand is a specific uniqueness associated with a product or services that enables the consumers connect with it by easy identification through the name, slogan, design, logo, symbols, etc. of the organisation that produces the products or
Yes, if the situation cannot be resolved, it would be in the best interest of the group to release the member. Before any action is taken, setting up an individual session with the disruptive member, always stay in full control of this session. Making sure it’s a private setting and the member feel trusted with giving and receiving feedback. Be straightforward about why you called this private session with them, make sure you have positive feedback to make to the person. Try to scratch the surface of why this disruptive negative attitude that transpire during group sessions.
Carefully crafting a brand and promoting that brand with marketing and advertising Utilizing a team to handle the non-creative parts
There was ease of communication and decisions could be taken at much lower levels since the leaders of the sub-groups had decision making powers. The members were motivated since they felt their individual contribution was appreciated. The consultation methodology contributed to knowledge sharing. The creativity that was as a result of the sub-division of the work was
We obey the thinking and constraints of the group mind, whether or not we are conscious of the sheep-like obedience to the ideas percolating within the group dynamic and the collective group mind. The concept of a “group mind” permeates our society; generally, under a fairly positive connotation with an aim of progressing ideas and combining individual ways of thinking to better the group. Projects are done in groups, groups are assigned to perform tasks together, and