Restorative justice makes efforts to compensate for the crime. In order to promote healing communities must know where the crimes are likely to take place and help offenders who have been harmed. It examines the causes of violence and crime. Offenders too have suffered harm
The practice is also called Victim-Offender Reconciliation because the mediation helps them to create a mutually agreeable plan to repair any damages that occurred as a result of the crime. The major benefit of this process is that it humanizes the “criminal justice process” as when the offenders are brought in front of the victims, the harm caused by them becomes evident in front of them, leaving no scope to justify or rationalize their heinous act. Furthermore, it is expected that this individual interaction will instill in the offender a sense of compassion for the victim, hence making it more difficult for the offender to replicate his wrong-doings in the future. • Family Group Conferencing (FGC): In this process, along with the primary victim and offender, the victim’s kin, the offender’s family members, and others connected to the offender or victim may also participate in this kind of dialogue session. FGC is often the most apposite method for juvenile cases, due to the significant role of family in any juvenile offenders’ life.
By matching treatment intensity to risk level, offenders receive treatment that will be most effective in meeting their therapy needs. Giving an offender the wrong intensity of treatment for their risk level, such as high intensity treatment to a low-risk individual, can have negative effects since a low-risk offender may already have protective factors in place. Another pro of the RNR model is that it has the advantage of targeting dynamic issues that are directly linked with a crime; This allows treatment to adhere to problems that may decrease future
Issue Presented: The use of rational choice theory, as well as labeling theory in regards to decision making and assisting in developing departmental policy. Short Answer: The ability to enforce stricter rules will change the thought process of offender before committing a crime or rule violation, along with making them productive members of society through re-entry will lift the label off of them. Statement of Facts: The use of rational choice theory can be used to help determine what offenders thought process maybe during the commitment of violating facility rules. This is often considered “risk vs reward.” (SNHU, 2018)According to the book Criminological Theories it states “rationality is the decision-making process of determining the
Specific deterrence and general deterrence purpose are to increase the "price" for a criminal act in order to discourage potential offenders from choosing to commit crimes. Restorative Justice processes are likely to reduce criminals from repeating offenses, as numerous recidivism studies have demonstrated. Thus, it would be more than justified to employ restorative processes a response to crimes under
Rather than focusing on retribution, restorative justice seeks to reconcile and rebuild the damage to victims, wrongdoers, and communities caused by the criminal behavior (Kaphake, 2004). Historical Social Justice: Restorative justice and giving back
Crime victims have been affected by federal crimes such as rape, assault, in some states burglary and homicide. The Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004contains rights important in protecting the victim from the perpetrator, giving accurate and timely information about notifications on public court or complaint procedures, payments or compensations for the victims and witnesses (Doyle, 2008). A victim mainly seeks for justice, fairness, dignity and respect. Knowledge of these rights through the provided systems like the Victim and witness notifications is effective as it enables the victims to receive justice in the right and immediate time. It reduces pain since the victims are somehow assured of being addressed and their complaints resolved.
Through demonstrating the work of Robinson and Scaglion (1987) we see evidence of Sir Robert Peel that relates to that of Durkheim and are still relevant in today’s policing. Using Marquis (1992) we can distinguish Durkheim’s theory at work, which emphasizes the importance of this approach. As the 21st century further develops a Durkheimian approach would offer great implications of the directions in which policing should proceed. Police in society today are being held accountable for their violent actions more and more with the influence of technology watching their every move. Adopting a Durkheimian point of view, polices role will shift with less of an emphasis on the use of force, but a problem oriented method of policing (Griffiths 2015).
I think I could see it very clear at AVP that these individuals who had a very violent past where they're talking about it with such patients that it is hard to imagine that they could have been violent. Restorative justice must be more than a program within the current system. Elliot argues in her book that “Facilitating this shift requires a rethinking of the assumptions around punishment and justice, placing emphasis instead on values and relationships. But if we can achieve this change, we have the potential to build a healthier, more ethical and more democratic society”. AVP has been known to help reduce violence within prisons, reduce recidivism, and improve communication both among the incarcerated community and with prison authorities.
It is the means of understanding the human behaviour towards criminal activities and the ways through which it can be controlled. Moreover, the theory considers two factors that are situational factor and personal factor, which are the major reason behind formulation of the theory. Beccaria developed the theory to make it convenient for the people to understand the personal as well as situational factors through which crime rate is increasing. This is because it helps in minimising the rising impact of criminal