In experimental researches, a scientist would systematically manipulate a suspected “causal variable” and then monitors the suspected “effect variable” to determine if it changes as expected (Stroebe & Diehl, 1991). Other characteristics of controlled experiments are that scientist use independent and dependent variables and they also use two groups of subjects, experimental (exposed to the independent variable to an unusual degree) and the control group (exposed to the independent variable to a normal degree). Controlled experiments have four main types of experimental designs: 1. Classical experimental: subjects are randomly assigned to one of two groups, and they also have two time frames. 2.
“There are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge: through passive observation or through active experiment.” To what extend do you agree with this statement? While looking at ways that humankind can produce knowledge for different areas of knowledge and using different ways of knowing, we will see that there are more ways to produce knowledge, but it is very much dependant on one's interpretation and perspective of the production of knowledge. The production of knowledge could be seen as a process that is only possible through passive observation and active experimentation, in for example the natural sciences and human sciences where sense perception is a key way of knowing that is used to produce the knowledge. How ever there maybe more ways of producing knowledge if we take a different approach and take a look Ethics, Religious knowledge systems or the Art, and ways of knowing such as imagination, intuition, and faith. SubKQ: To what extend can we see imagination as a way of producing knowledge, without it being a result of observation or physical interaction?
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science suggests that willpower is a belief of one’s own perception. Their experiment “indicated that a person’s belief that willpower can be depleted has more bearing on the theory of their own perception of willpower.” (Yirka, 2013, para. 1). MINI HABITS BOOK
A few information is more unpredictable to decipher because of the different reasons of long future; in this way talented experts, workers with secure occupations and low nervousness tenants may carry on with a long life for variation reasons. The more constructive
This does not mean that science is engineering. Engineering is about creating something that required by society. Whereas science is not like that, science is that you find something that already exists in nature, then you find out more about what you find. So, that is the difference between science and engineering. Engineering is manufacture something by using knowledge and technology.
You can learn from the past mistakes and see what can be changed so that those mistakes would not be repeated. You cannot learn without knowing the past. But the cons of using the traditional way of learning is that the sources we use might not be as reliable. It might not be updated or it might be too old. It will take us longer to progress due to the fact that we are using the studies from before databases came about.
Another way to deal with the fear of loss is to state, “it worked / it didn’t work”, “we are trying something new here” or “we are conducting a small experiment”. The fifth and final constraint discussed is not having the stomach for the hardest parts of the journey. It is often a fact that as we age our health sometimes declines. Therefore, if a person is going to endure the journey which at times may be stressful, it is extremely important to maintain good health because adaptive change will test the limits of one’s
He also points out that starting from understanding the ‘substance wonder’, today’s science has identified the ‘reasons’ or ‘principle’ behind the phenomena belonging to ‘substance wonder’. However, according to Kumagusu, what has been identified as the ‘law’ or ‘principle’ of phenomena is only touching upon part of all wonders; he explains that though ‘event wonder’ has been investigated through mathematics and logic, ‘heart-mind wonder’ through psychology, since they all start from ‘substance wonder’ as the object of the research, science has yet to find the right method to directly investigate ‘heart-mind wonder’ and ‘event wonder’. , Following his explanation of wonders and his criticism of science, he starts his explanation of his mandala as
Deadlines are set as check points prior to the big day in order to ensure work is productively getting done. Without deadlines, people would procrastinate for as long as possible holding back the potential of a great outcome. By having tasks finished on a certain day, we can rate which ones are of greater importance and shift our attention to those. If and when we miss a deadline we not only hold back that task, but we pause the entire line. It would be unreasonable to keep moving forward when a task is not complete because that information will stay lost.
In some instances, my patience runs out when people I am dealing with do not deliver as agreed. I tend to believe that failure in whatever I do is solely my responsibility and this sometimes a belief that it is not easy to manage it. There are also numerous areas in my learning style that I can increase upon. At times, if I don’t feel that I understand something, I get disappointed and lean to skip over that certain area. It may be that I try to make the most of and focus too much on what I do right that I give up on problems that do not come to me as simply.