• Thermal Oven
• pH analyzer
• Triple Quartz Distillation Unit
• HPLC Injecting Syringe (25 mL) (HAMILTON)
REAGENTS USED
1. Acetonitrile HPLC grade
2. Methanol HPLC grade
3. Water – HPLC grade
4. Mixed Phosphate Buffer
5. Lamivudine
LAMIVUDINE
TRAIL METHOD-I
Mobile phase Acetonitrile : Water (50:50) λmax 270 nm
Flow rate 1mL/min
Column Inertsil C8 150 x 4.6 mm
Retention Time 1.800 min
Efficiency 2030
Preparation of mobile phase:
Take 100ml of Acetonitrile in volumetric flask and dissolve it in 100ml of water. Then it is sonicated it for 10mint.
TRAIL METHOD-II
Mobile phase Water : Menthol (40:60) λmax 270 nm
Flow rate 1mL/min
Column Inertsil C8 150 x 4.6 mm
Retention Time 1.783 min
Efficiency 1294
Preparation of mobile phase
…show more content…
Then it is sonicated it for 10mint.
TRAIL METHOD-III
Mobile phase Mixed Phosphate Buffer (55:45) λmax 270 nm
Flow Rate 1ml/min
Column Inertsil C8 150 x 4.6 mm
Retention Time 1.567 min
Efficiency 999
Preparation of mobile phase Take 16.25gm of potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.3gm of dipotassium phosphate in volumetric flask and make volume up to 550ml by adding phosphate buffer to it , 450ml of Acetonitrile is added to the above one and made volume to 1000ml. Then it is sonicated for 10mint.
TRAIL METHOD-IV
Mobile phase Mixed Phosphate Buffer (55:45) λmax 270 nm
Flow Rate 1ml/min
Column Inertsil C18 250 x 4.6 mm
Retention Time 2.713 min
Efficiency
Prelab week 1 Calculations Preparation of 1.5μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=1.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(1.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.1ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.1ml×1000)μL= 100μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=3μmol/L × 10ml V1=(3μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.2ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.2ml×1000)μL= 200μL Preparation of 3μmol/L mixed low-level standard dilution 150μmol/L × V1=7.5μmol/L × 10ml V1=(7.5μmol/L×10ml)/(150μmol/L)=0.5ml Conversion of milliliters to microliters (0.5ml×1000)μL= 500μL Preparation of the blank samples The volumetric flask will be filled to the mark with 150μmole/L of stock solution to act as blank (reference). Additional two blanks will
Next, about 10 mL of both solutions, Red 40 and Blue 1, were added to a small beaker. The concentration of the stock solution were recorded, 52.1 ppm for Red 40 and 16.6 ppm for Blue 1. Then, using the volumetric pipette, 5 mL of each solution was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask, labelled either R1 or B1. Deionized water was added into the flask using a pipette until the solution level reached a line which indicated 10 mL. A cap for the flask was inserted and the flask was invented a few times to completely mix the solution. Then, the volumetric pipette was rinsed with fresh deionized water and
1. A number of different items were measured in this lab. For each of the following items, what did you find most challenging in making the measurement and how did that challenge affect the accuracy of the measurement? a) Length of the table b) Height of your partner c) Thickness of your finger
How to cook the perfect Boston butt in the oven Pork is the most popularly consumed meat in America and there is no surprise as to why. I mean, who doesn’t love slow cooked, delicious, BBQ? Whether you prefer sliced, chopped, or pulled pork; a Boston butt is the absolute best cut of meat for the job. It is tender, juicy, deliciousness just waiting to be topped with a well-balanced sauce or stuffed into a potato. But how often do you truly have the time to hunt down the best BBQ or venture to your favorite BBQ restaurant?
Unknown compounds verification Introduction: In Project 3 we are going to test an unknown compound and there are several different ways that can help us to identify the Unknown substance. And there is some pre-lab information that found in the internet. By Experiment 3: Identification of a Substance by Physical Properties “Every substance has a unique set of properties that allow us to differentiate one from another. These properties can be classified as either physical properties or chemical properties.
Chromatography Lab Riley Borklund Table 5, Seat 2A Lab Partners: Martin, Katherine, and Dakari Honors Biology, Mrs. Semaan January 5, 2016 Abstract: The purpose of this lab is to find what pigments are in a spinach leaf. The only pigments visible to the eye are chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. We know this because chlorophyll reflects the green wavelength of light and shows us that it is present. We also, however, wanted to know what else is present in the spinach leaf.
The 1:1 hexane to ethyl acetate solvent resulted in the best separation because it not only showed extra spots that the other solvent mixtures did not have, but also the 4 spots were relatively dispersed with Rf values at 0.77, 0.56, 0.27, and 0.10 (Figure 2). Missing spots were also noted on the hexane only TLC plate. The orange eluent was ultimately chosen as our major product because it had significantly different TLC results than the 3 yellow eluents with the same Rf of 0.23 (Figure 3). The percent yield for this purification method was 248% and the extrapolated percent purified yield was around 135 %, which are both erroneously high. These high percent yield may be due to extra water weight or not fully evaporated
As a safety precaution, the measured 4.0 mL of DMC was added to the flask under the hood. A stir flea was then added and was used to dissolve the TBAB. After dissolving the TBAB, approximately 0.52 g of potassium carbonate was added to the flask (note: potassium carbonate is hygroscopic and could readily take in moisture).
The purpose and significance of this experiment was to find the specific heat and figure out an identification of an unknown metal. The specific heat was calculated through a given formula. The unknown metal was found through descriptions that matched the unknown metal. The unknown elements would be one of the following: Al, Bi, Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Ni, Na, Sn, or Zn. First the specific heat of water was measured, then heat flow was measured using equations.
6 H2O) in 100 ml distilled water. (vi) 0.2(N) Sodium Hydroxide solution: Dissolve 8.0 gm sodium hydroxide in 1 l distilled water. (vii) Acetic acid: Dilute 1 part of glacial acid with 4 parts of water. (viii) Stock cyanide solution: Dissolve 2.51 gm potassium cyanide (A.R. Grade) in 1 l water, standardize this solution with 0.0192(N) silver nitrate solution.
Tube 1 had 1 drop, tube 2 had 2, and each tube after had an additional drop until tube 5. Next, deionized water was placed in each tube. Tube one had 4 drops; tube 2 had 3 drops and the pattern continued until tube 5. After each tube was filled with the glucose and deionized water, the contents were mixed and centrifuged. After the tubes were centrifuged, any pellets formed during the process were removed.
= 10^-3 M = 1,000 mL Here C1,C2; are the first and second concentrations of solution V1 and V2 ; are the required and current volumes. The impeller turned on and DDA, and tap water left to be mixed properly with water for 2 minutes. Approximately 150 grams of quartz added into the solution.
Next, the funnel was suspended through a ring, and 10 ml of 5% sodium hydroxide was added. When the two layers were separated in the separatory funnel, the aqueous layer was identified. The two layers were then separated into two different beakers. The water layer was acidified by adding concentrated hydrochloric
The reagents used were Diphenylamine reagent which contains concentrated H2SO4. The standard solution used for this test is the deoxyribose standard solution. In the sample, only a faint blue solution appeared, which indicates a small presence of deoxyribose. In test for Phosphate, the standard solution was the Phosphate solution and the reagents used were concentrated H2SO4, concentrated HNO3, 2.5% ammonium molybdate solution.
(Molarity)(Volume)(Molar mass) The pellets were dissolved thoroughly then was used in filling up the 100 mL volumetric flask. The solution was mixed well