When considering the audience’s point of view, there is a particularly strong sense of political influence behind it. Given the previous relationship between Australia and England when this movie takes place, the audiences’ view of a British attempt to frame the Australian soldiers for executing Boer prisoners has a lot of merit to it. To begin, the viewer would draw a sort of prejudice or memory of how their country came to be. Whether Australian, American, or any of the other countries or part of a country with vast amounts of land not yet settled; the British Empire had made it their goal to set out and colonize as much of that land as they could. To achieve their goal, the British Empire did whatever was necessary to defeat those who were already inhabiting them. …show more content…
To quote History Channel’s This Day in History web page, regarding Australia’s purpose and the British attitude towards them, it states: “The accepted wisdom of the upper and ruling classes in 18th century England was that criminals were inherently defective. Thus, they could not be rehabilitated and simply required separation from the genetically pure and law-abiding citizens” (History.com Staff). This merely establishes, however, the general outlook the government had on their prisoners and how those attitudes shifted to the future generations of Australians to come, which is where the audiences ' focus lead to questioning how the British prejudices affected the outcome of the
During World War 2, Australian’s were prisoners of war all over Europe. More than 30,000 Australian’s became prisoners between the years 1940 – 1945. These prisoners included airmen, soldiers of the 6th, 7th, and 9th division, and some nurses. They were prisoners of many countries. The main countries that captured Australian’s were Germany and Japan.
The establishment of these reserves was instrumental for the management, control and segregation of Aboriginal Australians (Hollingsworth p 101; Fozdar, Wilding & Hawkins 2008: 116). Hegarty’s own experiences of: constant supervision, segregation and separation, police escorts and patrols, physical restrictions, ‘strict discipline and unfair treatment’, and regimented structure; highlight the extent to which control and discipline were the instruments for indoctrinating the rules and regulations of the settlement (Hegarty 1999: 3,14,17,20,23,25,26,30,34,36,39,42,43, 53-55,57,58, 61,75-77,79 93,95,103,123,129,130,135,140). Moreover, reserve inmates were isolated and ’were subject to strict discipline, loss of privacy and autonomy’ (Hollingsworth 2006: 102). The basis for this oppressive regimented institutionalised racism was the intended outcome: a disciplined employable farm labourer or domestic servant; who understood the rules and therefore their position in society. (Hegarty 1999:
The following essay will aim to address several issues in regards to the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). The first issue of focus will identify how the RCIADIC links policies and practices of colonisation to Aboriginal people’s deaths in custody. Such policies and practices includes segregation, protection and assimilation. This will be followed by identifying how the RCIADIC recommends that relations between First Australians and police could be improved before discussing one such recommendations effectiveness of implementation in New South Wales. Segregation, protection and assimilation are all policies that have been linked to Aboriginal people’s deaths while in custody.
British government transported over 160,000 convicted felons to Australia between 1788 and 1868; of which at least 20% were convict women. Australia seemed like the perfect place to relocate “the very worst of British womanhood,” so they loaded them up and sent “hordes of drunken prostitutes who proceeded to infect everyone in sight with their criminal tendencies” to Australia. Or at least this is what most Australian historiographies would have you believe! With a shortage of testimonies and information about these convict women, many historians tried to paint a picture of the experiences and challenges these women encountered upon their arrival in Australia. These convict women were described as ‘damned whores’ of an ‘incorrigible class’
When recreating D-Day in the film The Longest Day they used the U.S. Sixth Fleet’s amphibious maneuvers at Saleccia Beach, which would be fortified along a two-mile stretch that would resemble Omaha Beach. A reinforced Marine Corps battalion with camouflaged net helmets and World War II-type leggings. As well as, a flotilla of French vessels resulting in a combined fleet of 22 ships that would substitute for the 5000 that were actually used on D-Day. Britain promised 66 vintage World War II ships, as well as, 150 men. France was able to provide up to two thousand men.
The book of my choosing was Australian Race Relations by Andrew Markus, this book gives detailed reasoning on the thinking behind why Great Britain decided to embark upon Australia and the reasoning behind doing so. I plan to discuss some of the similarities and differences regarding three main points that we have both discussed in class and that is presented in Australian Race Relations and they are; the idea of superiority that Europeans had regarding other countries, the racial immigrant segregation seen in the nineteen century Australia, and the ways in which Australia tried to keep themselves white from integration of outside races. Markus starts off his novel by addressing the underlying reason for the British takeover of Austria.
The new anti-colonial Asia was very critical of any policies based on racism. The White Australia Policy and its offshoots were causing resentment between the nations, and international controversies erupted over Australias handling of cases such as an attempt to deport 14 Malay seamen after the war. Australia had allowed a vast increase in its coloured population during the war, with forced migration of Asians fleeing the Japanese invasion and the following occupation. The migrants were given a sanctuary, but there was an understanding that they would return back home when the war ended. Many of the migrants had married, or found life in Australia and later refused to accept their obligation to leave.
Britain exercised quite a lot of control over Australia due to Australia being in the Commonwealth and because Britain was seen to many Australians as ‘the mother country’. Throughout the war, Britain was ignorant and selfish towards the Australian government and the needs of the Australian nation, never listening to their opinions or ideas (Sydney). The inadequate defense of Australia proved to the Australian government that Britain no longer provided Australia with the defense it required. This was evident in the high number of troops fighting in Britain rather than in Australia itself (many of whom were in fact Australian) with troops who travelled back and forth from Australia and Britain taking up to four months. Australia and Britain were very extremely close, mainly due to the fact that Britain founded Australia, and Australia considered them their "mother country".
The film 13th directed by Ava DuVernay targets an intended audience of the Media and the three branches of the United States government with an emphasis that mass incarceration is an extension of slavery. It is intended to inform viewers about the criminalization of African Americans and the United States prison boom. 13th uses rhetorical devices in its claim to persuade the viewers by using exemplum in the opening seconds of the film. President Barack Obama presents statistics, saying “the United States is home to 5% of the world’s population but is home to 25% of the world’s prisoners.” Also the film uses a hyperbole in talking about the movie Birth of a Nation produced in 1915 which portrays a black man as a violent savage who will kill white women.
Bad Day at Black Rock Kathryn Abbott October 29 2015 DRAMA 3030 The unexpected arrival of a stranger to a small, Midwestern town creates a feeling of scepticism and suspicion, and through this the explicit meaning is revealed: Fear of the unknown and the moral and physical deterioration of a town left to its own devices. The film exemplifies these concepts through the use of mise-en-scène, and vivid cinematographic elements. The blood red coloured train stands out against a muted background.
It was soon discovered by political parties across Australia that something very drastic had to happen in order for the integrity of Australia’s borders to remain secure. When such a significant outpost fell and 130000 Soldiers became prisoners of war(L Murdoch, 2012)-a very large percentage of Australian troops- morale was low, even amongst military leaders. So when Britain refused to aid Australia in bolstering and reinforcing its national borders there was much anger on local and national levels. Citizens believed that they deserved the right to a liberated country especially with the number of men who had fought and died for that same ideology. At the time though there was very little speculation of a Japanese attack so this rage quickly died off.
In 2015, HBO aired a six-part, true crime documentary series titled, The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst. Writer and director, Andrew Jarecki, examined the details of three crimes associated with Durst, including the disappearance of Durst’s first wife Kathy, the murder of his dear friend, Susan, and the murder and dismemberment of his neighbor, Morris Black. While the mini-series was met with acclaim, many – including myself – criticize The Jinx for its storytelling approach. The series seemingly blurs the lines of storytelling – for entertainment purposes – and journalism; raising many questions regarding ethics. Initially, Durst approached Jarecki regarding an interview after he saw All Good Things, a film Jarecki had released
Australia’s experiences of World War II were significant for Australia and impacted on the shaping of our national identity. Australia 's response to entry into World War II in 1939 differed from Australia 's entry into World War I in 1914. Reasons for this includes attitudes towards war changing after gaining the knowledge and experiencing consequences of World War I, the conditions and lead up to World War II as well as Australia’s strong support for Britain. Firstly, the attitude of Australians changed due to World War 3I proving that war was not glamourous or exciting like it was assumed. During the lead up to World War II Australians had already struggled to survive through the depression and were now required to survive at war.
Australia has a long ugly history of racism and xenophobia that date back to the early beginnings of colonisation and forced biological and cultural assimilation of indigenous peoples to the white/Anglo British culture. Historically colonization was justified for saving primitive cultures