Actors Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin were charged with involvement in an illegal scandal to get their children into college. American parents concern themselves about where their children attend college more than Canadian parents would. In Canada, parents do not see a major difference between a prestigious university and a less prestigious one because they are of the same quality. In “This Is Why Canadian Universities Don’t Have College Admission Scandals,” Tyler Kingkade uses American college admission scandals, the low acceptance rate of Ivy League schools, and Canadian school admissions to demonstrate that, unlike the United States, Canadian universities accept students based on merit rather than bribery, exclusivity, and status. The …show more content…
Many things are built on the idea of an inner circle, which you can see in private schools and colleges, country clubs, and VIPs in clubs and concerts. The more exclusive that the place is, the tighter those networks are, and if American universities were interested in merit and efficiency, places could get bigger and, in some ways, they have an economic incentive to expand and collect more tuition, but their social standing rests on the ability to exclude people. (Kingkade 3). Ivy league schools are prideful of their low acceptance rate because it gives them elitism. The more selective an institution is, the more people want to attend. Instead of focusing on being an exclusive institute, these schools should accept students based on merit, like Canadian …show more content…
College admission should universally admit students using their transcripts and grade point averages. Canada uses this approach and includes no need for an entrance essay, letter of recommendation, as well as standardized admission test. With a 69 percent acceptance rate, The University of Toronto is one of the top twenty-five universities in the world. The size of these top universities in Canada contributes to an equal playing field in the job market following graduation (Kingkade 2). Since Canadian universities do not use the same tactics to admit students, they can have a higher acceptance rate while allowing for a fair employment search after graduation. Since exclusivity is minimized, they are allowed to see a grad not as their status but rather for their merit, therefore they can be more impartial. Canada is not doing anything unique; they are just demonstrating equality on the playing
Now, because of this trend, students tend to apply anywhere disregarding their desire of school and their interest of program instead of searching for colleges that their programs might suit them best. Then after they get accepted to one or more of the schools they applied to, they decide which one to go to. This whole process is “only making things worse for everyone” as Beres said. The student who got accepted at one school that he is not interested in has taken the spot of an interested student, and might end up changing schools. That is how both students as well as the university are being hurt by this whole process.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-599-x/81-599-x2012008-eng.htm Population in Canada who have higher education level have been increased recently, but only a small portion of them had a diploma or degree in science, technology and engineering(18.6%). “In 2011, 2,196,200 adults had a postsecondary
As perfectly illustrated in Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor’s book Mismatch, underqualified students admitted to more prestigious institutions on the grounds of providing diversity results in a marked increase in those same students struggling in their field of study and even dropping out when compared to their peers who attend schools more closely aligned with their previous
His article spoke a powerful truth that millions of Americans must be aware of. I agree with his call for more working-class students of all races at elite universities. The opening lines of the article where he mentions that most qualified low-income student do not attend Ivy League schools are upsetting since their financial status acts as a negative component to their college application. The privileged point of view of trustees and administrator present serious obstacles to these intentions ever manifesting into reality. The fantasy that all young people are running the same race blinds many university trustees and administrators to the reality that they undervalue students who always have to run uphill.
They explain that “high-achieving low-income students never even apply to the selective schools” because they tend to be more expensive (219). This statement is a hasty generalization fallacy (219). Owens and Sawhill do not show any evidence to support this statement and the choice word “never” should not be used in the comment
Both internal and external factors unionize to form a potent concoction characteristic of outliers everywhere. For illustration, examine the life of 17-year-old high school student Kwasi Enin, who gained acceptance into all 8 Ivy League colleges. The USA Today article asserts, “For most of the eight schools, acceptance comes rarely, even among the USA's top students. At the top end, Cornell University admitted only 14% of applicants. Harvard accepted just 5.9%” (Toppo 1).
Canada and the US share have close bonds with their education system because more than 28,000 Canadian students attended U.S. schools in 2013-2014, while more than 12,000 American students studied in Canada in 2013. The economy booms with immigrants and travellers
It would be easier is they pay the same amount as Canadian students. Lastly, give them more opportunity to become a Canadian.
The American public school system is arguably weak when compared to other countries, but it still functions to educate the public. The issue of inequality arises when it comes to higher education and who has access to it. Due to higher education costing anywhere from tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in the United States, it is easy to see why there is an unequal level of access to higher education. Some might argue that higher education is not necessary and that the poor can find a living without it. This is not only restricting the poor to the lower class, but is simply not true.
Over the course of many decades, Canadian Immigration experiences have changed dramatically. Two differences being that discrimination has decreased tremendously, refugees are now accepted, and one similarity being that there are job opportunities. Firstly, in the early 1900s there was a lot of discrimination towards other ethnicities besides the white. For example, in the residential schools, First Nation children had been stripped from their families and forcefully put into schools. They tried to assimilate anything resembling First Nations.
The demand of exceptional faculty and staff are all contributing factors to the industry current positioning. Positioning helps clients to identify the company and decipher if they would want to invest and/or partake of the distinct services offered. Therefore, it becomes essential for universities to incorporate numerous diverse programs into its institution; and implement unique structures to disseminate information. The more an institution is willing to offer, the better it is for them to draw more students and factor in the cost into its tuition. Students are willing to pay more to attend s prestigious college, such as Harvard and MIT, because they know that level of education is top-notched, and the prospect of getting a high-paying career, is
Increasing admission requirements would in turn improve "flagship" of the university. Top schools like Stanford or Harvard have extremely difficult acceptance, but once graduated those residents have changed the state and the world. For example: John Roberts graduated from Harvard in 1979 and now chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. He has changed the whole of the United States not just Massachusetts. By being the flagship school, more determined, hard working, self motivated people would join the university.