ipl-logo

Saint Augustine's Argument Analysis

1591 Words7 Pages

Throughout the history, humankind was consistently concerned with the basic nature of the human beings. Consequently, there has always been a debate on the attitudes of the philosophers and scientists towards competing ideas that whether humans are intrinsically good or evil, whether humans are natured or nurtured, whether humans are fundamentally selfish or altruistic, whether it is all about our inner states that make us to behave in a certain way or it is mostly associated with external factors such as our environment that shape our identity. In this paper, compelling arguments of the above-mentioned different schools will be analyzed, evaluated, discussed and concluded. The initial school of thought suggests that, humans are inherently bad, selfish and egoistic beings. Origin of this view roots back to ancient times. One of the supporters of this idea is Saint Augustine. In his theory of evil, Augustine put an emphasize on the relationship between nature, …show more content…

In his most well-known work Leviathan, Hobbes dictates that all humans are similar, they have same objective and adopt the same means of obtaining it. When he talks about the reasons why people want to create a legal state, he refers to the basic nature and behavior of humans. He mentions state of nature which is hypothetical condition of no-government. In the state of nature, every man would have whatever he could obtain by whatever means and property would be one’s own only as long as one could keep it. There is no restriction, no morality, no law in the state of nature, and people are consistently engaged in the “war of every man against every man”. So that humans enter to s social contract because of the continual fear, and danger of violent death poor, nasty, and short life. They give up their freedom in order to have an authority who would have the coercive power to protect them( J.Hobbes, 1909,

Show More
Related

  • Literary Analysis Of Night And Leviathan

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Leviathan, Hobbes was the original author to suggest that humans are prepared to do terrible things, when there are no consequences. Hobbes paints the picture of a world in a “State of Nature,” which is referring to before governments controlled people, and before people had set customs and tradition. In saying this, he is implying that people are naturally evil, and that without a strong, central government to enforce rules, people are prepared to do horrendous things for their own personal gain. Thomas Hobbes doesn’t mean that people are evil directly, though. He means that several factors of human nature combine and mix to create something that is ignorant, arrogant and greedy.

    Read More

  • Daoist's Argument Analysis

    420 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the Confucian scholar, Mencius, human nature is likened to that of water. "The goodness of the human nature is just like the downward tendency of water. Just as all water has a down going tendency, all people have a tendency toward goodness... you can push people into doing evil, but that is not their basic nature" (Bilhartz, 2006, p.287-288). Mencius continued to explain that human beings have an inherent goodness and the human nature should not be blamed for any evil act committed.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Leviathan Analysis

    1317 Words  | 6 Pages

    Philosopher Thomas Hobbes in his book Leviathan discusses and analyzes the natural state of man and the concerns of societal structure along with the proper implementation of a legitimate government, which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. Focusing primarily on the second half reading, Hobbes begins chapter eleven by claiming there is neither an utmost aim nor a greater good and that man, left to man’s own devices, or in his natural state, seeks power after power and this continual desire for power only ceases in death (Hobbes 61). Hobbes continues by stating that when men live with no common power, that is no strong central government, they are in a constant state of war. Man’s life without the state

    Read More

  • Are People Inherently Evil

    965 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the years of human advancement people have suffered and lives have been stolen in the pursuit of personal gain. Although it does make me question if it is always for someone’s personal gain or if there are other factors that are involved. The human mind and soul has been shown to be inherently evil one generation after another. I n this paper I will discuss why I think people are inherently evil through some genetics, how someone was raised, and the selfish things that people do in hopes of bettering themselves. I will always stand by the idiom “the apple does not fall far from the tree” and explain how we, humans don’t change throughout our offspring, and thus we can be eternally evil.

    Read More

  • Emma Goldman And Ayn Rand

    1238 Words  | 5 Pages

    Human being’s true nature and essence has been a relevant topic in philosophical thinking for a long time. One of the most important aspects discussed when considering human’s true nature is ‘estrangement’. Whether or not we are born with a predefined set of rules that makes us egotistical and separates us from one another or whether we are altruistic in essence. If it happens to be the case that humans are estranged in essence, it t is important to consider whether or not estrangement can be overcome by certain means. This is a topic that also affects political thinking and although coming up with a definite answer has proven to be an incredibly difficult task, an answer or the approximation to one would be incredibly helpful in organizing

    Read More

  • Good And Evil In Meg Murry's A Wrinkle In Time

    660 Words  | 3 Pages

    They put their selfish desires before the emotions of others. What if good and evil exists in every being but the stronger one reflects through our actions and our behavior. Good and evil is a reflection of inner conflict within ourselves. This is what will be established in this paper. There are many examples that can prove that good and evil is only a reflection of inner conflict.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    1441 Words  | 6 Pages

    Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

    Read More

  • Augustine's The City Of God Against The Pagans

    398 Words  | 2 Pages

    Augustine was a priest and writer that believed evil did not come only from the flesh. He uses this view in his book The City of God against the Pagans. In the book he describes his version of evil in the book of Genesis, why man and women ate of the fruit, and what he believes to be the cure for evil. Augustine believes that we sin more with our mind than with our flesh.

    Read More

  • Leviathan Vs Hobbes

    1685 Words  | 7 Pages

    If suddenly society crumbled to pieces and there were no laws, no leadership, and utter chaos, could man ever find a way out of the rubble and war? Thomas Hobbes believed so, and in his book, Leviathan, he explains that the nature of man, initially selfish and war-like, would eventually strive towards order through slow development of a social contract of political absolutism. Written after the turmoil of the English Civil War, the book has a lot to say on how man ought to be governed to ensure that the past never repeats itself. Hobbes believed that in order to succeed, society needs the input of select members of society with the authority to rule over the rest, while also maintaining the monarchy, or Sovereign. Although Hobbes was one of

    Read More

  • Are Humans Inherently Good Or Evil Essay

    315 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Question of whether humans are inherently good and moral, or inherently selfish and immoral has been the centre of philosophical discussions for hundreds of years. Philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes argue that humans are egotistic, or selfish. Whereas Philosophers such as John Locke argue that humans are altruistic, or selfless. I, however, do not believe humans by nature are good nor evil. Humans are born as a Tabula Rasa (blank slate), they are unable to be moral or selfish as they are not born with this mental content.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes During The English Revolution

    1645 Words  | 7 Pages

    Therefore, he suggests that everyone consents to give up their rights to an absolute authority for his/her own good whether it is one person or body of persons (38). Hobbes also proposes that humans enter a covenant with the authority and submit to a power as if they are “all in one and the same person” which is his ideal “commonwealth” (39). This is the conclusion from which Hobbes derives the title of his work Leviathan, a biblical figure who is “the monster that ruled over chaos at the beginning of the world” (Petrovic 12). To Hobbes, the most effective power to preserve harmony in the commonwealth would be a monarch (39) who would be most successful in fulfilling his duties namely protecting the commonwealth and enforcing good laws as well as “public instruction, both of doctrine and example” (39-40). In Hobbes opinion, it would be devastating, essentially the “greatest evil”, if the rights of the sovereign were violated as this would have people fall back to the state of nature which everyone would want to avoid (40).

    Read More

  • Augustine's Analysis: Where Did Evil Come From?

    628 Words  | 3 Pages

    The question arises, “Where did evil come from?”. If you think about evil as physical realities and material things, this is a very difficult question for monotheists who believe in an infinitely good god. If there’s an infinitely good god who has created everything, and among the creations of god are things that are evil, then it logically follows that God created evil things. Augustine comes to see that evil is not really a physical entity at all. You cannot go buy some evil nor can you look at it under a microscope.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas Argument Analysis

    1055 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Summa Theologiae (selection 6), Thomas Aquinas argues that perfect happiness can only be achieved once a person dies and enters heaven. One of the strongest arguments that Aquinas gives for this argument relies on the claim that this world is too plagued with unsatisfied desires to achieve the ultimate good which we all seek by nature. Since happiness on Earth is not perfect, only heaven can provide true happiness. In this paper, I will argue that this argument succeeds because true happiness requires something more than what this existence provides, while a sort of imperfect happiness can be found after this life.

    Read More

  • Augustine Problem Of Evil

    608 Words  | 3 Pages

    God gives people the power to choose their actions and evil often results from these deeds. Augustine believed that people cannot comprehend the judgment of God, and they are unable to understand His mind. Augustine’s ideas were shaped by Neoplatonism and Manicheanism (Linsenmayer).

    Read More

  • St. Augustine Doctrine

    1526 Words  | 7 Pages

    In ancient times, each state had its own theories and perceptions of how the rules for waging war should be defined. The right of going to war is known as jus ad bellum. In ancient Greece, waging war against barbarians was considered to be just. It was Saint Augustine (354-430 C.E.), a prominent Christian in Ancient Rome, who first put forward a just war doctrine. Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), a renowned theologian, concurred with St Augustine’ doctrine.

    Read More

More about Saint Augustine's Argument Analysis

Open Document