The inherent dark side of humanity remains giving optimum reason as to why the strengths of the traditional realist approach to military security outweigh the weaknesses. As the realist school of thought suggested, each state has one agenda, to survive and will therefore go through any means necessary to ensure this. However there will always be others who believe there is more to human nature and more to state agenda than realism allows for. In conclusion, realism has dominated the study of security significantly and in turn has dominated the concept of military security. Realism in relation to military security will continue to dominate as its fundamentals encompass what military security is all about.
Some modern critical theorists believe that it is the way we see things that is the cause of our power or powerlessness. The System Theory, the first thing of note is that system theory sees things as wholes. It does not believe that one would understand something better by splitting it up into parts. Modern systems theory is based on the idea that all share the same concepts. (Higgs, 2015) There are different ways of looking at a problem when studying the system theory .
The inherent dark side of humanity remains giving optimum reason as to why the strengths of the traditional realist approach to military security outweigh the weaknesses. As the realist school of thought suggested, each state has one agenda, to survive and will therefore go through any means necessary to ensure this. However there will always be others who believe there is more to human nature and more to state agenda than realism allows for. In conclusion, realism has dominated the study of security significantly and in turn has dominated the concept of military security. Realism in relation to military security will continue to dominate as its fundamentals encompass what military security is all about.
Thomas Hobbes also had a significant impact on political thought (Sorell, 1996). For example these ideas that the people were selfish and brutal and also his ideas regarding the role of government and resulted in more investigations by other philosophers like John Locke. After the Revolution, the ideas of Thomas Hobbes also had considerable impact on Federalists in their arguments to adopt the Constitution (Hobbes, 1986). Hobbes believed that all the people should have equal rights and therefore no person should have more power as compared to others (apart from the King, who should have absolute power). As a result of the ideas of Hobbes, it was believed that the people cannot survive if a strong central government is not present to protect them.
The study of the four theories (realism, neo-realism, liberalism, and neo-liberalism) gives more insight in comprehending the world through a philosophical lens. In this paper, the four theories are examined in relation to what they depict about the society and the world today. The examination of the four theories in this paper seeks to reveal their implications in different spheres of life, including political and social domains of the society. This study is significant in exploring these theories to relate their implications in the contemporary society while projecting what they mean for the future. Realism Realism is associated with a radical change in the way things were done during the antiquity.
Out of these three great philosophers, they had varying different viewpoints on life. Thomas Hobbes however, he was rather pessimistic on his views of life. According to a McKay, Crowston, Wiesner-Hanks, and Perry (2013), “Hobbes held a pessimistic view of human nature and believed that, left to their own devices humans would compete violently for power and wealth” (p 492). Hobbes made it clear that he did not trust humans would make the best decisions for
The theory unleashes such dynamic forces that from the time of its inception up till now it has governed the international system of the world however things one day itself fall apart. The Realists mark the State as the locus of different international circles and these sovereign states have vested interests which are always selfish. Realism is a heartless theory, man is not supposed to be selfish in the way exaggerated by the Realist thinker however [he] is a seeker of knowledge and what so ever he stumbles upon, he keeps
Of the many theories and theorists discussed in our History and systems of Psychology class, the Utilitarianism theory stood out to me the most. This theory, founded around the 18th and 19th century by philosophers (theorists) Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Their theory purports that, “social, economical or political decisions should be made for, the betterment of society. It bases the moral worth of an action upon the number of people it gives happiness or pleasure to” (Investopedia, 2017). No one wants to operate at a loss and this principle teaches that priority can be given to the things that would yield the greatest outcome.
He is the representative of the common people. So, it is essential for him to be preferred the majority of the voters. But FPTP does not follow this principle. FPTP also effectively gives rise to the concept of tactical voting. In this case, voters often tend to not vote for the candidate of their choice but they rather vote against the candidate they dislike the most.
National interests of a superior state may prevent the attainment of peace in a developing state. The realist theory stresses the constraints on politics imposed by human selfishness and the absence of international government. The theory further emphasizes that states are sovereign and are motivated by national interests. The United States of America has acted as the world’s police interfering in other states’ matters especially if the state can benefit them. A specific example of this such