ipl-logo

Three Types Of Plea Bargains

230 Words1 Page

The three basic types of plea bargains: the first one is where the defendant may be allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge; the second is one is, at the request of the prosecutor, a defendant that pleads guilty may receive a lighter sentence than they would if not requested; and thirdly a defendant may plead guilty to one charge in exchange for the prosecutor’s willingness to drop other charges that could be brought. There are three factors that will cause a prosecutor to decide on a plea bargain, they are the seriousness of the offense, the defendant’s criminal history, and how strong of a case the prosecutor has. Plea bargains serve interest to just about everyone that is involved. Plea bargaining serves the interest of all court’s

Show More
Related

  • Annotated Bibliography Deal Frees West Memphis Three

    550 Words  | 3 Pages

    The author looks at the time period that the three were released and discusses the reason for their release, which is Alford plea. In this case, the defendant is voluntarily forced to plead guilty while still proclaiming his or her innocence. The author also looks at the evidence and ends up concluding that that there was little evidence that linked the defendants to the murder. In addition, the author criticizes the state’s government for forcing the men to plead guilty. Using another case, the author looks into this matter by examining the flaws related to the Alford’s plea.

    Read More

  • Why Did Amy Albritton End Up In Jail

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and defendant where the prosecutor offers the accused to plead guilty to a lesser sentence or to only one of several charges without going to court. What percentage of cases in Harris County are the result of a plea bargain?

    Read More

  • Gideon V Wainwright Case Summary

    631 Words  | 3 Pages

    Defendants asked for leniency and the prosecutor offers a deal and they take it because they are tired of sitting in jail, but few realize that by taking

    Read More

  • Example Of Larry Servedio Case

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    The upside of accepting a plea deal usually involves the defendant's pleading guilty to a lesser charge, or to only one of several charges. The agreements allow prosecutors to turn their attention and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to attend. Though by accepting a plea deal one pleads guilty to one charge which usually results on your record forever because you plead guilty and didn't take your chance of proving your innocence by going to trial. For example if Larry Servedio did not want to accept his plea deal of two consecutive state prison terms of seven-and-a-half years by pleading guilty to two felony counts of second-degree kidnapping and go to trial he would face the possibility of losing the case and be sentenced to longer terms in prison. For the prosecution it saves them time but most important it helps the judges not overcrowd prisons by sentencing criminals to short terms which usually keeps them within their county lines.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargain Research Paper

    1308 Words  | 6 Pages

    Plea bargain are intend for when the prosecutor has enough evidence to put some into prison they can reduce they charges they are being tried with. This will also reduce

    Read More

  • Texas Judicial Branch Case Study

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, a defendant might accept a plea bargain from the prosecution before trial, because the evidence against them is overwhelming. If that is not the case, the prosecution will have to prove their case to a jury beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime, and the defendant should have to serve jail or prison time for their punishment as a result of their crime. In conclusion, many people believe the Texas Judicial Branch needs refurbishing for the 21st century.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargain

    1857 Words  | 8 Pages

    Plea bargain offers many pros to both the prosecutors and the defendants. For a defendant, the major advantage of plea bargaining can be to take away the improbability of a criminal trial. Having defendants use the plea bargain law helps the prosecutors to handle more cases (Larson). Most defendants want to avoid risking getting a maximum sentence. Usually prosecutor’s possible (likely) use plea bargain to avoid a messy trial to stop from harming their reputation (Larson).

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    628 Words  | 3 Pages

    A plea-bargaining is when a prosecutor offers a reduced charge or decrease the number of charge. The defendant come to an agreement with the prosecutor to plea guilty to the sentence they are on trial. The defendant pleads guilty to the crime they are being changed with in order to avoid a trail and avoid more severe sentence. Plea bargaining consents of a judge that authorize the tail which accepts or denies the defendants guilty plea. A defense attorney is who advocates for the defendant to protect the right of the individual.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    737 Words  | 3 Pages

    The judge is not bound to follow the prosecution’s recommendation. There are generally three types of plea bargains used in the justice system. Charge bargaining, the most common form of plea bargaining, sentence bargaining and fact bargaining (Plea Bargains: In Depth,2017). Plea bargaining can have its

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with less than the maximum sentence. For example, the prosecution and the defense may agree to a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony charge or the parties may agree to a sentence of 12 years instead of 20 years if the recommended sentence for that crime is 10-20 years imprisonment.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining In Court Cases

    534 Words  | 3 Pages

    PLEA BARGAINING Plea bargaining is a process of negotiation and results in a plea agreement between the defendant and the prosecutor for lesser charges. Basically, plea bargaining circumvents the trial process by evading more serious charges. About 97% of federal cases and 94% of state cases are disposed of by this method without ever going to trial. There can be advantages and disadvantages to this.

    Read More

  • Bond Hearing Reflection

    452 Words  | 2 Pages

    This week, I was able to attend court each day I was present in the office. Tuesday, I observed Bond Hearings. During this process, the judge asks the defendants various questions while taking their guilty plea, such as their highest grade completed, age, ability to read and write, were the under the influence of any illegal substances, the charges presented against them and if they were satisfied with the representation of their attorney. One of the common themes with most defendants is that they did not complete high school, which in my opinion directly correlates the probability of committing and crime with education. There was also an individual who originally was going to be sentenced under the first offenders act, but after the judge gave the discloser that he could be sentenced up to ten years if he did not comply with the terms and conditions given by the court, he decided that he did not want to take the first offenders act.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    987 Words  | 4 Pages

    The United States criminal justice system is riddled with cases of many varieties. Some have obvious outcomes while others warrant more detailed analysis. However, some cases go beyond the court into other courts, where they are decided, such as Jackson versus Hobbs in 2012. The courts try to lighten the load of cases they have by offering plea bargaining, an agreement among a defendant and a prosecutor in which the defendant pleads guilty to a charge that is less severe than what he or she is initially charged for in the hopes that clemency will be administered. Sometimes, however, people accused of a crime are completely innocent, and it is not until technology is released, such as DNA testing, decades later that these people are proved to

    Read More

  • John Pfaff Lock In Sparknotes

    1080 Words  | 5 Pages

    Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

    Read More

  • Three Major Components Of The Criminal Justice System

    265 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the criminal justice system, there are three major components. They are the police, the courts, and the corrections. Each one of the components has a role to play in the system. The police are in charge of arresting and investigating crimes. The courts are charged with the responsibility of punishing offenders while the corrections implement the court rulings.

    Read More

More about Three Types Of Plea Bargains

Open Document