Tim Goeglein Presentation Analysis

831 Words4 Pages
Tim Goeglein Presentation Name Institution Tim Goeglein Presentation Question One In his presentation, Goeglein says that Ronald Regan and Dr. Jerry Falwell have influenced his life to a greater extent. He states that they made him know that fact that public life and religion can go together perfectly without running into conflict. Goeglein discusses in his presentation that the fact that Ronald Regan and Dr. Jerry Falwell were strong Christians and unshaken politicians did not affect their lives. He claims that Christianity and politics do not have to be separated from each other so long as one can manage his moves efficiently (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSA1JZ7HOPg). Question Two When Tim Goeglein was sent an email…show more content…
He claims that the institution of marriage has been invaded into such that it loses its divine meaning. For him, marriage is not made for more than two people who are the husband and the wife. The marriage institution is not supposed to be for two men and two women as stated by Goeglein in his presentation. Also, Goeglein says that the marriage institution is not made for one woman and two men as many Americans have defined it in the recent past. Goeglein concludes on this attack by claiming that the institution of marriage is supposed to be respected and handled with utmost honesty…show more content…
According to him, people in the American society have changed the definition and importance attached to life. Goeglein cites that the problem of abortion has affected the American society to a great extent such that there are 5o million abortions recorded since the year 1973. Goeglein discusses in his presentation that people should be human enough to curtail abortion since it deters another life from seeing the earth. He claims that each and every person is made according to the image of Christ. Therefore, he says that no one is supposed to take the life of the other even if in the womb. Lastly, Goeglein says that the decision to take one’s life should be a consensus of two people and not one as the case of abortion
Open Document