Does Andrew Jackson Deserve to be on the $20 Bill? Do you know who is on the $20 bill? The person on the $20 bill is Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of America. He started out poor in his life and educated himself to become smarter and then he became a lawyer.
Recently, there has been some debate as to if Andrew Jackson deserves to be the face of the twenty dollar bill. During his presidency many believed that his actions portrayed him more like a monarch or a king than a president. This mindset is shown through the use propaganda by Edward Williams Clay in his cartoon, “King Andrew the First, Born to Command.” Because of these king like actions some believe that he does not deserve to be on the twenty dollar bill. However, Andrew Jackson fully believed that he was making the right decisions with the choices that he made during his presidency, “it was settled by the Constitution, the laws and the whole practice of government that the entire executive power is vested in the President of the United
Andrew Jackson was inaugurated on March 4, 1829 as the seventh president of the United States of America. His inauguration was so joyous for the citizens that he was given the nickname "King Mob," due to the mad rush of people who stormed the White House to get a chance to shake his hand. Although Jackson's presidency lived up to its title, the "era of the common man," he also participated and led many unconstitutional acts during his reign. Due to these reasons, Jackson does not deserve to be on the twenty-dollar bill.
Andrew Jackson has found his way onto the modern day $20 bill; however, does he deserve his picture on our $20 bill? The answer to that question is no. Andrew Jackson was completely against any kind of bank. Jackson also founded the corrupt “spoils system”. These points are only two of the many things Jackson did that makes us question why he is on our $20 bill.
[...] However, [it] forced Native Americans to vacate lands they had lived on for generations”(Doc 5 Par 3). This fact even further supports the idea that Andrew Jackson was not a man of morals even for his time. Although Jackson’s intentions were “good” in terms of manifest destiny, The Indian Removal
Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, has done many good and bad things throughout his presidency for the country, however, his actions beg the question, does he deserve to be on U.S currency? Jackson’s actions both good and bad show that he deserves to be on currency. Andrew Jackson deserves to be on U.S currency because of his contributions to expanding the presidency as we know it today, his help to prevent conflict within the nation during the nullification crisis, and his actions during the Bank War. Andrew Jackson, our seventh president made very crucial contributions and further formed what a presidential role looks like today. In Jackson’s “First Inaugural Address,” he lists out the things
Does Andrew Jackson Deserve to be on the 20-dollar bill? In my belief Andrew Jackson does not belong on the 20-dollar bill, due to the simple fact of that in 1836 Andrew Jackson tried over throwing the U.S national bank because he believed that hard currency like gold and sliver should be used. Andrew Jackson in some sense is an ironic placement on any paper currency in the United States. Although this topic is very controversial in the United States. I will try and clarify my belief about why Andrew Jacksons placement on the twenty dollar bill and why he should be reconsidered.
Andrew Jackson was President of the United States from 1829 to 1837. Some call his term a triumph and some a tragedy. A big part of his tragedy was the Indian Removal Act in 1830. Jackson wanted to remove the native tribes from lands in the eastern and southern United States (Stock). Jackson referred to the Native Americans as savages and supported Georgia’s efforts to seize Cherokee land and nullify the tribe’s laws (Foner).
Andrew Jackson has killed many people and deserves to be replaced by Harriet Tubman on the 20$ bill. One reason why he should be replaced is, Jackson is “A slave-owning president who forced Cherokees and many other Indian nations on deadly marches out of their southern homelands.” (Paragraph 3)This explains Andrew Jackson at his worst… he has driven around 16,000 Indians out of their homeland to walk for 1000 miles without much food or water. On the other hand Tubman risked her life to free African American slaves. Another reason is that it keeps reminding people of what Jackson did.
This next paragraph explain why people think he should not be on the twenty dollar bill. Andrew Jackson was a hot head who did stupid and outrageous things. Many people said he didn 't have a legislative personality. He would have duels without thinking rationally. When he was younger he would get drunk and get into trouble.
Thesis: Andrew Jackson should not be on the $20 bill. Topics: Jacksonian Democracy: Jacksonian Democracy meant a different way of viewing democracy. The whole democracy changed because of Major General Jackson. Major General Jackson changed what Democracy meant from what Jefferson thought it should mean.
However, there is a national movement underway to replace Andrew Jackson on the 20 dollar bills with other person recently. Many people saying that Andrew Jackson must remove from 20 dollar bills because he was a mass murderer, an Indian killer and a wealthy slave owner. During the war of Creek, he recommended that to kill all the Indian children and Women to complete the extermination after massacres. He was also racist against African peoples and a scofflaw and others. Although the reason above was the main that why people thought that he has to be remove from the bill, but he still became a two-term president of America, which mean that most of the people accepted
Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.
Andrew Jackson has been remembered as a ground breaking president, even being put on the $20. President Jackson was a controversial figure, doing many popular and unpopular things in his time. Although he is remembered as a hero from the war of 1812, he also caused the Trail of Tears and tried to destroy the National Bank. As a result, Jackson should not be put on the $20 bill. His actions have caused many misfortune showing that villains do exist.
On the other hand, for people who have Indian heritage, might consider this a horrible act passed by President Jackson. It could be vice versa as well. In reality, though, Jackson really did want what was best for his country, even if that included getting rid of Indians to another region. I believe that he wanted the best for the tribes too and that he wanted all of them to be together, just not in this particular land. Overall, I think that Andrew Jackson had very good intentions, they just might have come off as discourteous or inconsiderate to
