Was he justified
In Jon Krakauer's book Into the Wild, the main character, Chris McCandless, makes the decision to leave his family and embark on a journey of self-discovery. This decision ultimately leads to his tragic death in the Alaskan wilderness. The question arises whether Chris was justified in leaving his family and pursuing his own desires
. Chris had a strained relationship with his family. He felt suffocated by their expectations and the pressure they put on him to conform to their ideals. He wanted to break free from this and find his own path in life. In this sense, it can be argued that Chris had a valid reason for leaving his family. He wanted to discover who he truly was and what he wanted out of life, and he felt that
…show more content…
He wanted to live a life of simplicity and to be free from the materialism that he saw as corrupting society. However, his actions could also be viewed as selfish and immature. He left his family without warning or explanation and did not think about the impact it would have on them u realize this on page 37 when he gives his entry about living life to the fullest Chris's actions were also dangerous and reckless. He had no experience or training for living in the wilderness, and he put himself in a dangerous situation without any means of communication or assistance. It could be argued that his decision to leave his family was not only selfish but also stupid
Now, there are still plenty of angles to look at this situation. You can look at it from his family's view of being pissed off, scared, even that their son took off and disappeared with no trace whatsoever. His on pages 129-130, it talks about his family grieving for him. His mom saying she doesn't understand why he took those risks and his sister saying she can't go a day without crying for him. Then there's the side of Chris,
Chris had the courage to realize he was unhappy and make the change. Although this was much more drastic than what most people would be willing to do, it was his way of finding a home. A place. His peace of
Kendall Waibel Mrs. Moffat English 5-6 11 January 2023 Was Chris Justified? Have you ever thought about leaving your family and friends to go out into the wild to just die? In Jon Krakauer’s book Into The Wild, a man named Chris left his whole life without a trace, to go into the wild. Chris McCandless was not justified in leaving his family without a trace. Chris had plenty of reasons to stay then go off into a forest, he had no reason to just abandon his family and leave them nothing, Chris’s life was not the worst thing ever and there was a better way he could have done things than just to leave.
Which to me means he was ready to leave, and if he's old enough to change his name and be who he wants he's old enough to leave. So my second reason why I think he was justified is his home life. When Chris was young his home life was very traumatic. His dad was very abusive to his mom and his mom only stayed because she had Chris with him.
Isaac Swank-Le Period: 1 English 5-6 Was Chris Justified? If you could cut your family out of your life and never have to see them again unless you choose so, would you? Would you take that opportunity? There is a story of someone who did this and was made famous for it in Jon Krakauer's book Into the Wild.
The book I'll be talking about is called Into the Wild and the main focus will be about a man named Chris McCandless and his journey into the wild. Was Chris McCandless' journey meaningful or just pointless? I personally think that Chris wasn't justified in what he did because he left everyone behind without a care in the \world. Chris had a lot of things some people would dream of.
Elijah Greenup Mrs. Moffat English 5-6 11 January 2023 Was Chris Justified? Have you ever thought about life and decided to change for happiness? In John Krakauer's book, Into The Wild, Chris McCandles, an explorer, leaves his past behind and goes out into the wild to live the life he enjoys. Some people think it was stupid of him, I believe that Chris is justified for going into the wild. Growing up, Chris was the eldest of his siblings.
Going into the wild with no preparation, no food, no water nor resources, and no plan on what to do sounds interesting and a big decision to do. It mostly sounds crazy but not for Chris Mccandless, he did just that in the book “Into the wild”. The short summary of it is that he went out and found it better to live out in the wild, the main issue was his selfish and problematic decision to everyone and everything behind. I believe Chris Mccandless was justified in leaving his family and going into the wilderness, some of it wasn’t justified but I feel mostly in his rightful decision.
Also that he left because his family was abusive in his childhood made him have trauma. Some other people might also say that he wants to find the peace that he could not find when he was a child. but I disagree with this just because he is a grown man it doesn't mean that he can't make poor decisions. And if he had trauma from his childhood he could just talk and try to make their relationship better or get some money from his dad and travel somewhere good and live in peace. and freedom doesn't mean that you can do anything Chris left without telling no one which did a lot of damage to his family and wasted other people's time and resources who wanted to find
There is a lot of controversy about the death of Chris Mcanddles and whether he was justified or not in leaving his family behind without saying anything or telling anyone where he was going, so many are wondering if he was justified or not. I believe Chris was justified for several reasons. We learn about Chris’s rocky, unstable relationship with his parents. In the book, it says on p. 6 that "he hadn't spoken to his family in nearly two years. " This shows that something major happened between Chris and his parents because any normal person would've maintained contact with their parents even if they moved out of the house; most would at least have a phone number.
One big reason Chris wasn’t justified is he caused his relationship with all his loved ones to fall apart and hardly ever spoke to his family because they wouldn’t understand and Chris probably felt as if they’d try and stop him from an adventure. In talking with Jim Gallien, Chris told him “he hadn’t spoken with his family in nearly two years.” (pg 6). This shows that Chris doesn’t value his relationships because the amount of time he's away and lost contact doesn’t phase him.
After reading Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, I wondered to myself why I should even care about Chris McCandless. I can see how some think Chris McCandless was an idiot and he was trying to kill himself. After I dove deeper into this question, I learned that Chris McCandless story teaches us important life lessons. Chris McCandless teaches us to get out of our comfort zone. Ronald Franz was an older man who encountered Chris McCandless and gave him a ride from Salton City California to Grand Junction Colorado In Chris’s last letter to Ronald Franz, he says “So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation…
Was Chris Justified? In the book into the wild Chris is justified because he was an adult and did not have a very good past with his family and he wanted to find himself and did the things that made him happy. The first reason why Chris was justified because he was 18 still in high school living with his parents in Annandale Virginia around 2 years after was in his early 20s when he left (pg .22) “ by the beginning of August 1990 Chris's parents had heard nothing from him” this shows that Chris is old enough to make his own decisions. As an adult Chris's decision makes sense because he was mentally/physically abused by his mom and dad his dad would physically abuse and his mom would mentally abuse Chris by saying “you're the reason
On page 6 of Into the Wild Chris says “nobody knew of his plans that in fact he hasn't spoken to his family in nearly 2 years” part of this was because he did not want to talk to his parents over everything that has happened throughout his life with them. Throughout the story his family situation has a hard topic to talk about. The information that I stated shows how his relationship with his family was rocky to say the least. The second reason why Chris McCandless was justified in leaving his family was, he was doing what he loved, being out in nature and being on an adventure.
I think he just wanted to pursue life in a different way. Chris was not seeing life the way anyone else was, so he decided to brush off into the wild and be free on his own. Though he did not survive, he was still a very bright, arrogant human being. Shaun Callarman states, “He had no common sense, and he had no business going into Alaska with his Romantic silliness.” Chris knew going into the wild that he did not have much survival skills, but that did not stop him from doing what he wanted to do because he did not care about society and was just completely over everything which was why he made the move to the wilderness.
He wanted to ditch his old life so maybe he was trying to cut off ties to the world as well. If you take that the wrong way his death may seem like suicide suddenly, but from many other papers that is not implied. The majority think that it was just an unfortunate few events that led to his death. If Chris would have taken a few more resources his life possibly would have lasted longer than it did, and using his story wrote an inspiration book. But he died, so there’s no reason to play the game of “what-if” because it could go an infinite number of ways.