To What Extent Is Liberal Nationalism An Oxymoron?

Ultranationalism is an extreme form of nationalism in which interests of one 's state or people are placed above all else are promoted. And crimes against humanity are widespread systematic attacks against a civilian population which can include murder, enslavement, deportation, torture, etc. Ultra Nationalism and national interest can lead to crimes against humanity because a leader can get clouded in a haze of what is best for their country that nothing else matters no even other nations and the will do anything to achieve their goals. Take the Holodomor for example, Joseph stalin had felt that it would be best if the privately owned kulak farms should be amalgamated and form several collective farms, which he and the government would control

Canada is “too afraid” but every country should follow in our footsteps and be proud of their nation while showing good nationalism then all hate would finally be at ease. There are plenty of examples of good and bad Nationalism but we as a country can forget about the past hate and focus on the new peace. Olympics are one of the most popular events that happen in the world and it is just the greatest thing to see all countries (that can afford it) to come together and no hate is around, only pride. The reason why I am picking the Olympics as an example of good nationalism is we are rooting so hard or our team and/or athlete to win and get disappointed if they lose and I ask myself why? I have never even talked to or meet this person nor

Liberal traditions are significantly rooted in the argument for open borders. The concept of open borders can not be correctly understood without studying its liberalistic ways. John Rawls is a theorist whose ideas against immigration revoke the liberalism that surrounds open borders. However, the three thinkers who support open borders as liberalism are Joseph Carens, John Mill, and Sheyla Benhabib.

Liberalism is a theory of international politics that the fundamental force in world politics is globalization. Globalization is interdependence between the interests of groups and different societies. Those group then go to their governance and ask them to regulate globalization in different ways. This leads to creation of world system that includes states with quite vary state preferences. Therefore, liberalism is a bottom up theory where globalization drives different preferences of states.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines Fascism as "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition."

Classical liberalism, the term in politics, is a retrospective of distinguishing to old liberalism from new liberalism in the early 19th century. It is which it believed that the government that governed least governed best. Until now, it was referred to all forms of liberalism, such as social liberalism or economic liberalism, prior to the arrival of liberals and conservatives. Compared to liberalism, classical liberalism assumed that individuals are rational and capable of overcoming obstacles without resorting to violence. In philosophy, classical liberalism separately protects the freedom as well as property rights. It also limits the government’s power. During the past summer, there was news involving classical liberalism. The statements people make about it can be investigated, when it comes to

Nationalism is the belief of being attached to ones nation. It is the political view that your country is great and you strongly believe in nations. The reason why nationalism is good and different from all the other movements is because it keeps your nation together and reduces violence and also keeps the state away from civil war. Nationalism is just like patriotism because they both are individual towards their nation. Nationalism was the most successful form of political force in the 19th century. Nationalism is an ethnic group that involves culture, ancestors, and land. People have the power to love their culture and land and to protect it. Every nation has different cultures and nationalism is from those cultures. Nationalism is the thought that the culture that your country represents is more organized than other countries. Nationalism is not about thinking that your country is better than others; it is about having the love for the culture that your country represents and appreciating it. There is nothing wrong with loving and appreciating your country. Loving your own country and hating other countries are two completely different things. The world is in need of more love, and nationalism is a good start, as long as we are showing respect to other nations.

    Freedom of French citizens can only be achieved when occasionally the death of a patriot or a tyrant has been accomplished, without this our country's freedom will not prosper. “The Tree of Liberty” can be defined as the rights and freedoms a citizen is given. The source in simple terms is basically saying without the blood shed of a few citizens from time to time a country can not have the rights and freedoms occur naturally. This source best fits into civic nationalism because it talks about the rights and responsibilities not being upheld without a military service, which covers all the criteria of civic nationalism. Thomas Jefferson has such an extremist view supporting civic nationalism, whereas someone like King Louis XVI would have had a completely opposite point of view that's against civic nationalism. I agree with the source because if people are not willing to give up their lives then the military would collapse and so would the country's safety. Therefore the loyalty of citizens

Cox and Stokes (2008) define liberal internationalism” as the framework in which U.S. foreign policy has been dictated throughout the 20th, and well into the 21st century. The “Wilsonian” doctrine of international cooperation is defined as being the framework for liberalism through the development of the League of Nations and the United Nations, which has been a longstanding tradition through the development of the United Nations under the leadership of the United States. This form of “liberal internationalism” assumes that the interests of the United States and its democratic allies have a right to defend their interests

The title of this essay is to explain the importance of nationalism between 1870 and 1914 .In order to do just that it is important to understand what nationalism is however it is imposibble to provide a truly satisfactory definition of nationalism that fits all the facts and to which there is no exceptions. ,“Nationalism is a feeling that people have of being loyal to and proud of their country often with the belief that it is better and more important than other countries: a desire by a large group of people (such as people who share the same culture, history, language, etc.) to form a separate and independent nation of their own.” Many things are citied as the reason for World War 1 and certainly nationalist feeling is one of them especially is countries such as Germany were the outbreak of War was greeted with a feeling of

Classical liberalism is a political ideology, a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom. However, Modern liberalism has made several significant departures from classical liberalism, most significantly resulting from their different views on what exactly constitutes freedom. Classical liberals such as Adam Smith and John Locke believed in the freedom of interference by others, whereas modern liberals see freedom as the right of accessing the opportunities and resources needed to fulfil one's potential.

European power prior to 1871 had been dominated by a handful of larger countries. Various smaller states existed but had little influence in the overall politics of Europe. Germany and Italy would, however, upset this balance.

Many international relation scholars use the three main schools of thought, realism, liberalism and constructivism, to understand and analyze states’ behaviors in the international arena. Each of the three theories uniquely explains the reasons behind a state’s behavior in times of peace or during a conflict. Realism is the school of thought that believes that the international system is anarchic and thus the states try to gain material power. On the other hand liberalism focuses on the power of institutions, which are founded on common values and goals of the state, in the international system. The last theory constructivism believes that state goals are a reflection of social norms, values and history of a state. Many scholars today use

The location of the liberal party in the 20th century later replaced by the working class. Founded in February 1900, the federation of trade unions launched the British labor representatives committee, by affiliated to the worker congress of trade unions and the Fabian society, independent Labour and social democratic alliance, renamed in 1906 the Labour party. Labour early attached to the liberals, and during world war I joined the party coalition cabinet, but starting in 1924, the liberal party formally decline, Labour and the tories, in turn until today.The conservative seems to be more easy to contend with the status quo, or liberal more prone to anxiety self-reflection.Although classical liberal thought, can survive things usually have some function, and good for society, but they also know that in the legal, political, and economic aspects of some long-term continuous practice and tradition, completely is because of the powerful interest groups in order to want to benefit from the public policy and the result of the pressure. Therefore, we actively advocate in the column to break the status quo, in order to improve the efficiency and increases the chances of the poor.

Neoliberalism is interpreted as new form of liberalism. Neoliberalism is a theory that holds that states should try to achieve absolute gains rather than trying to achieve gains relative to other countries. Neoliberalism argues that in an interdependent world, states will seek efficiency in managing collective problems presented by international anarchy.