ipl-logo

To What Extent Is Liberal Nationalism An Oxymoron?

406 Words2 Pages

Is liberal nationalism an oxymoron? Liberal nationalism is a hybrid doctrine proposing and supporting the idea of the mutual interests between a non-xenophobic type of nationalism affably compatible with the values of freedom, tolerance, equality and individual rights of liberalism. It is an international system based on nation states that are not only free because they have achieved statehood from a nationalist viewpoint, but also because they represent their citizens and guarantee their rights from a liberal perspective. Being representative of their people, these states are thought to be more prone to have nonviolent cordial relations with each other and collaborate for shared goals. Consequently, a liberal nationalist order safeguards

Show More
Related

  • Example Of Good And Bad Nationalism In Canada

    179 Words  | 1 Pages

    Canada is “too afraid” but every country should follow in our footsteps and be proud of their nation while showing good nationalism then all hate would finally be at ease. There are plenty of examples of good and bad Nationalism but we as a country can forget about the past hate and focus on the new peace. Olympics are one of the most popular events that happen in the world and it is just the greatest thing to see all countries (that can afford it) to come together and no hate is around, only pride. The reason why I am picking the Olympics as an example of good nationalism is we are rooting so hard or our team and/or athlete to win and get disappointed if they lose and I ask myself why? I have never even talked to or meet this person nor

    Read More

  • Three Major Theories Of International Relations

    923 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many international relation scholars use the three main schools of thought, realism, liberalism and constructivism, to understand and analyze states’ behaviors in the international arena. Each of the three theories uniquely explains the reasons behind a state’s behavior in times of peace or during a conflict. Realism is the school of thought that believes that the international system is anarchic and thus the states try to gain material power. On the other hand liberalism focuses on the power of institutions, which are founded on common values and goals of the state, in the international system. The last theory constructivism believes that state goals are a reflection of social norms, values and history of a state.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Ultranationalism

    202 Words  | 1 Pages

    Ultranationalism is an extreme form of nationalism in which interests of one 's state or people are placed above all else are promoted. And crimes against humanity are widespread systematic attacks against a civilian population which can include murder, enslavement, deportation, torture, etc. Ultra Nationalism and national interest can lead to crimes against humanity because a leader can get clouded in a haze of what is best for their country that nothing else matters no even other nations and the will do anything to achieve their goals. Take the Holodomor for example, Joseph stalin had felt that it would be best if the privately owned kulak farms should be amalgamated and form several collective farms, which he and the government would control

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography: US Foreign Policy

    1459 Words  | 6 Pages

    Complete Annotated Bibliography Cox, Michael, and Doug Stokes. 2008. US Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cox and Stokes (2008) define liberal internationalism” as the framework in which U.S. foreign policy has been dictated throughout the 20th, and well into the 21st century. The “Wilsonian” doctrine of international cooperation is defined as being the framework for liberalism through the development of the League of Nations and the United Nations, which has been a longstanding tradition through the development of the United Nations under the leadership of the United States.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Fascism

    1263 Words  | 6 Pages

    Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines Fascism as "a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition." Basically what this breaks down to, also according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, although for students, Fascism is "a political system headed by a dictator in which the government controls business and labor and opposition, is not permitted." The Liberals continuously call the Conservatives, Fascists, but more often than not, in doing so, they themselves are being Fascists. For example, yesterday was a day set aside for the Conservatives to gather and show their support for President Trump. Plainly many Liberals protested this support because they cannot stand the fact that anyone wants to support our President.

    Read More

  • John Rawls Argument For Open Borders

    469 Words  | 2 Pages

    Liberal traditions are significantly rooted in the argument for open borders. The concept of open borders can not be correctly understood without studying its liberalistic ways. John Rawls is a theorist whose ideas against immigration revoke the liberalism that surrounds open borders. However, the three thinkers who support open borders as liberalism are Joseph Carens, John Mill, and Sheyla Benhabib.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Classical Liberalism

    1392 Words  | 6 Pages

    Classical liberalism, the term in politics, is a retrospective of distinguishing to old liberalism from new liberalism in the early 19th century. It is which it believed that the government that governed least governed best. Until now, it was referred to all forms of liberalism, such as social liberalism or economic liberalism, prior to the arrival of liberals and conservatives. Compared to liberalism, classical liberalism assumed that individuals are rational and capable of overcoming obstacles without resorting to violence. In philosophy, classical liberalism separately protects the freedom as well as property rights.

    Read More

  • Liberalism In Health And Social Care

    219 Words  | 1 Pages

    While the strengths perspective uses the language of social justice and empowerment, the solutions it suggests are essentially grounded in (neo)liberal notions of individual responsibility, which have their roots in Kantian ethics and utilitarian means–end justifiation. Like liberalism, it upholds autonomy as an overriding moral ideal, a belief in people’s ability to choose with informed consent as the “standard liberal procedure by which agents manifest their autonomy” (Kristjánsson, 2007, p. 45). Liberalism promotes a small core of values, inflting autonomous choice and “the benefis of high self-esteem [which]…fosters the current self-help and therapy culture” (p. 178) of which social work, and especially the strengths perspective, is a part.

    Read More

  • European Power Prior To 1871: A Comparative Analysis

    141 Words  | 1 Pages

    As nationalists were behind these movements, other countries in Europe feared what would happen next. If the nationalists in other parts of Europe could unite and now prove to be rivals, what would then happen to the general order of politics for the rest of Europe? The very fabric of peace that had followed the wars of the early 19th Century was

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Civic Nationalism

    808 Words  | 4 Pages

    Source analysis     Freedom of French citizens can only be achieved when occasionally the death of a patriot or a tyrant has been accomplished, without this our country's freedom will not prosper. “The Tree of Liberty” can be defined as the rights and freedoms a citizen is given. The source in simple terms is basically saying without the blood shed of a few citizens from time to time a country can not have the rights and freedoms occur naturally. This source best fits into civic nationalism because it talks about the rights and responsibilities not being upheld without a military service, which covers all the criteria of civic nationalism. Thomas Jefferson has such an extremist view supporting civic nationalism, whereas someone like King Louis XVI would have had a completely opposite point of view that's against civic nationalism.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Communism And Fascism

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this day and age of mass shootings, mass hysteria, and mass ignorance, political debates occur everywhere. In these so-called “debates”, many of the participants have their terms misconstrued. This can cause confusion and even lead to emotional, ad hominin attacks. The usual culprits of these ad hominin attacks, Liberals, have no basis for their arguments, and thus resort to emotions to back up their points. Liberalism falls on the left, progressive side of the political spectrum, while conservatism and libertarianism lie on the right side.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nationalism

    928 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nationalism Nationalism is the belief of being attached to ones nation. It is the political view that your country is great and you strongly believe in nations. The reason why nationalism is good and different from all the other movements is because it keeps your nation together and reduces violence and also keeps the state away from civil war. Nationalism is just like patriotism because they both are individual towards their nation. Nationalism was the most successful form of political force in the 19th century.

    Read More

  • Liberalism Vs Conservatism

    1496 Words  | 6 Pages

    Liberalism and conservatism has been modified throughout the years to make up what we call government today. Liberals and conservatives have different views on how the government should run today. People that believe their beliefs are conservative belong to the Republican Party while people that believe their people that believe their beliefs are liberal related belong to the Democratic Party. These two parties seem to have different views but they debate on identical topics. Liberals are more for helping individual’s rights while conservatives concur with the ideas they don’t agree on affirmative action.

    Read More

  • Idealism And Non-Socialism In International Relations

    1309 Words  | 6 Pages

    Name: SOLOMON OTUBO Student Number: Y1214.110007 COMPARISM BETWEEN NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBRALISM IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Introduction The quest to solve the problem ravaging the relations among states in the international system has being a challenge among scholars in the international relations as a discipline of study. This is not because there are no attempt to proffer solutions to such problems, or that theories have not being formulated to tackle such challenges. But it is because there has not being an adequate theory that would either proffer a lasting solution, or give a holistic analysis that will be generally accepted among scholars of international relations.

    Read More

  • Liberalism Vs Conservatism

    241 Words  | 1 Pages

    The location of the liberal party in the 20th century later replaced by the working class. Founded in February 1900, the federation of trade unions launched the British labor representatives committee, by affiliated to the worker congress of trade unions and the Fabian society, independent Labour and social democratic alliance, renamed in 1906 the Labour party. Labour early attached to the liberals, and during world war I joined the party coalition cabinet, but starting in 1924, the liberal party formally decline, Labour and the tories, in turn until today. The conservative seems to be more easy to contend with the status quo, or liberal more prone to anxiety self-reflection. Although classical liberal thought, can survive things usually have some function, and good for society, but they also know that in the legal, political, and economic aspects of some long-term continuous practice and tradition, completely is because of the powerful interest groups in order to want to benefit from the public policy and the result of the pressure.

    Read More

More about To What Extent Is Liberal Nationalism An Oxymoron?

Open Document