Compare and contrast the foreign policies of Bismarck vs. Kaiser Wilhelm. How were their decisions significant to WWI? (At least three paragraphs). (9 PTS) Otto Von Bismarck was the prime minister of Prussia from 1862 to 1873, and the chancellor of the German empire from 1871 to 1890. Overtime, Germany began to trust his judgement and followed every order that was appointed by him.
The notion of Kaiser Wilhelm II’s war-mongering attitude operating as the powder-keg for the outbreak of war is very popular among historians. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s actions had either made the situation in Europe more complex or it played a direct role in eroding political stability (Waugh, 2001). He was driven by the motive to secure Germany’s place ‘in the sun’ (Chinn, 2014). This desire had urged the newly crowned Kaiser to adopt a more aggressive foreign policy, known as ‘Weltpolitik’, as well as encouraging him to /dismiss Germany’s guardian of peace, Chancellor Bismarck (Chinn, 2014). These moves paved the way for Kaiser Wilhelm II to challenge and rile his French and British foes.
The cause of WW1 wasn’t just one event, but multiple things that added up: classes, nationalism, and alliances between countries. As the war was about to start, the countries prepared for battle, although they didn’t know the outcome but they were ready to fight to the death. By 1914, the power key that was imperial alliances had been given a crucial spark; the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand triggered series of war declarations that would eventually grow into the most devastating war the world had ever experienced. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was nephew Emperor Franz Josef and heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, (heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne) was one of the main reasons that WW1 was put into place.
Weinberg does agree that Hitler would of course preferred to avoid a conflict with Western powers, but he realized that this was something he would inevitability have to face. Hitler’s Chief German biographer, Joachim Fest, argues that Hitler’s growing sense of mortality was what convinced him that it was time to increase aggression. Tooze that not much has changed regarding the positions on this topic since the 1980’s, but offers the probability of some alterations as a result of new archival evidence. This evidence, Tooze argues, forces historians to further explore Hitler’s war against the his Jewish enemies who he blamed for Germany’s economic crisis. He explains that Hitler viewed Germany's problem through the lens of his racial ideology and this made war inevitable for him.
George Washington leadership definitely contributed to the success of the American Revolution. George Washington demonstrated bravery, humility, intelligence, and sacrifice to his soldiers during the American Revolution. Washington showed his intelligence and strategy skills in both successful surprise attacks on the British in Trenton, New Jersey and Princeton, New Jersey. During the surprise attack in Princeton, Washington displayed bravery to his men by riding into the midst of battle and them to victory. Washington earned respect from his men by showing humility and sacrifice when he chose to live in harsh conditions with his soldiers instead of his person quarters.
World War 1 was the first global conflict as it was a struggle between the leading world powers in Europe that had colonised the 19th century. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Bosnia, heir to the Austrian-Hungary throne was a major trigger factor that led to the World War breaking out. It initially began as a European quarrel caused by the rivalry between nations which led to a series of mobilisations. In addition, there were many other vital factors to consider and these include Imperialism, Nationalism, Alliances and Militarism. This essay will explain how the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in 1914 triggered a number of events that led to the outbreak of World War 1.
Germany would be a major player in the upcoming wars in Europe. Bismarck was also aided Italian unification by defeating Austria and giving Venetia to Italy. Bismarck is partly responsible for the start of World War I because he initiated the secret alliance between Austria, Italy, and Germany, he increased nationalist feelings in Europe through the multiple wars which led to countries to be more prone to war, and the Franco-Prussian War caused France to seek revenge on Germany. If Bismarck had not come to power, European history would have been completely
Serbia wanted to take over Bosnia and Herzegovina. This assassination led to Austria-Hungary declaring war on Serbia and all the events, that i already wrote about in the previous paragraph. In the conclusion, i can say that, World War I was the result of many factors and reasons, but mostly it was foolishness and shortsightedness of the country leaders of the time, that made the war happen. In 1889 Otto von Bismarck talked abut Europe in the future and said that it would be: ‘The nightmare of coalitions’ and hid predictions came true. Essay N.2 Source
The war generated murder and misunderstanding by aggression, anger, violence, and antagonism which alarmed other countries and pressured them to join this barbarous time period. While many say that militarism was the cause of WWI, it was not the only reason. Most importantly the damage it has created.There were other additional reasons to WWI. The Main causes of war are Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism, and Nationalism. All of these causes made WWI so powerful
The economy was good. Many say WWI was caused by nationalism and militarism (Ferguson contents) .People don’t realize that there were many events that led to the war. The most important event that led to World War One was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. On June 28, 1914 Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austro- Hungarian Empire and his wife were